Bobbie Jo Major's Essay: Peer Review

Peer Review for Self-Evaluation Essay

Reviewer: Bobbie Jo Major

Reviewed: Sandra

Please respond by using whole sentences. Answer each question thoughtfully and thoroughly. Please review the essay posted immediately below your own.

1. How does the author introduce her essay? Why is or isn’t it logical and/or engaging? The author introduces her essay about wondering if everyone has a writer inside. The introduction was engaging, capturing the reader’s attention.

2. What information does the author need to add, and what information does she need to eliminate? In other words, what information is missing or superfluous? Additionally, on what specific parts of her essay did she focus? What specific suggestions did she have for improving her own essay? How did she justify her grade for each section? The author does not need to add any further in information. She suggested that we can all draw inspiration from particular events in our lives and, how those events remain within us. Example, “The last memory of my father, who was like a hero in my eyes, was of

Why is or isn’t the essay arranged logically? Are there adequate transitions to connect ideas and move the essay toward a conclusion? Does the author occasionally leave an idea “unfinished”? If so, identify it and explain what she needs to include. If the essay isn’t arranged logically, how can the author revise to remedy this issue? Address specific parts of the essay. The essay is arranged logical; it has an engaging introduction, and a wonderful conclusion and the body appears to correspond with the rubric scale. The essay transitioned well from one event to the next.

4. How does or doesn’t the author demonstrate a sense of audience awareness? If she doesn’t demonstrate a sense of audience awareness, how can she remedy that? The essay demonstrates audience awareness, For example, “As I explore the idea that “Everyone has a hero inside”, I also have to wonder if everyone may have a writer inside.