Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for and against cultural relativism
Arguments for and against cultural relativism
Arguments for and against cultural relativism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments for and against cultural relativism
The two approaches (idealistic, materialist) to anthropology are at battle with one another, I believed both have points to argue in a fashionable way to interpret primitive culture. Boas, idealist view argues for a historical approach to study and interpret culture. His theory of cultural relativism examines primitive culture`s background and history to interpret an understand cultures. He argues that the idea of a uniform evolution does not fully explain culture and its change; however, he agrees that some cultures will build upon past experiences of other cultures and take upon what they find resourceful to shape their own. To Boas a materialistic view is not something we should explore, it does not explain the uniqueness of a culture. Eleanor
In my opinion there is not one right way to view culture, however, I do believed is that theorists have argued that primitive cultures are unique and that studying them gives us an insight to their cultures. Boas is the father of anthropology in America, and his idea is well-known among anthropologists and non-anthropologists and it may not be complete but he started something big and his idealistic view is an approach that argues the uniqueness of cultures. Anthropologists after Boas have created theories and even produced theories that see this primitive cultures in a different lens. Eleanor Leacock may not be a fan of Boas but surely his contributions lead her to her own path and she questions anthropologists before her. She created a deeper understanding in gender inequalities in egalitarian cultures and her contribution is not forgotten. Wolf may argued that Leacock did not stop to think maybe this culture where already changing before colonization and that the power of these cultures lies within the culture environment. Wolf may be neither a materialist nor idealist, yet I believe he is closest to a materialist. His study of power structural and both tactical is one many will talk about and argue; however, we can acknowledge Wolf is right we must arrive with new questions to the insight of culture. Culture is something that will be study for years and many will questions are unanswered, but we as humans never stop evolving. Wolf expresses this in his argument one must try answering questions and the only responsible for this answer are the anthropologists who study primitive
When considering the birth of America, most people look to Christopher Columbus and the Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth Rock. In An Infinity of Nations, Michael Witgen looks to shed light on the role Native Americans played in the formation of early America. Witgen analyzes the social relationships between the European settlers and the indigenous tribes of the Anishinaabeg and the Haudenosaunee in order to tell the story of the westward expansion of early American civilization. Witgen depicts agreement and conflict between the colonizing groups while also explaining the formation of power within them – but his analysis is incomplete. The incorporation of Joan Scott’s and Michael Foucault’s definitions of gender and power relationships into
Robbins, R. H. (2014). Cultural anthropology: a problem-based approach (Second Canadian ed.). Itasca: F.E. Peacock.
She examines some similarities in today’s “white culture” and the historical attitude of the exploring Europeans. The Europeans, when inhabiting North America, “just moved in and said they had God on their side and the Indians weren’t much anyway but a few of them could work for them sometimes if they behaved themselves, and the rest were lined up for disposal” (377). The Europeans believed themselves superior to the Indians; any and all action – fair and unfair alike – taken against the Indians was justifiable because it helped the Europeans. Grover argues that this irresponsible approach is the basis of the white culture. White culture is simply American culture taken and modified as seen fit by white people.
Spencer, Robert F. Methods and Perspective in Anthropology. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1954.
Alfred L. Kroeber once said: “Anthropology is the most humanistic of the sciences and the most scientific of the humanities.” For centuries, anthropologists have studied various cultures in search of answers about humanity. What are other cultures like? How are other cultures different from ours? Why are they different? Anthropology originated from the Greek words Anthropos (human being), and -logia (study). In the field of Anthropology, there are four sub-fields: Biological, Cultural, Linguistic, and Archaeological. Each of these sub-fields can be beneficial to study the theory of evolution, and all of the sub-fields are important in their own respect. However, the biological and cultural fields are, perhaps, more significant than the others regarding evolution.
Desjarlais, R., & Throop, C. J. (2011). Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 87-102. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092010-153345.
... argues that even though our mission is to understand the culture we our studying one cannot make final assumptions about a culture. One has to reflex on the fact that a culture is always changing and that our preparation of our discipline is not often the method one uses in fieldwork.
Cultural relativism is powerful and unique, ascertaining and appreciating people cultural. Cultural relativism is unique but can be hard to understand, upsetting the views, morals, and outlines of culture from the standpoint of that civilization. When analyzing the hominid culture, it provides the luxury of understanding their philosophy from their viewpoint. Taking in another culture without being basis can be daunting. Anthropologist deliberated cultures by exploiting two methods, the emic perspective, and etic perspective.
Tylor EB. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art and Custom. New York: H. Holt and Company; 1874. p. 1. (check the date of pub.)
Neo-evolutionism is a nomothetic theory which is based on using the general principles of evolution to explain how cultures change through time. This theory is a “reformation” of the late nineteenth century evolutionary theory of cultural evolution. (Erickson 1998:116) Cultural evolution explains that all cultures, progress through different evolutionary stages, which starts from a “simple” stage and ends with a “complex” stage of culture. (Erickson 1998:119)
Lewis Henry Morgan has been credited as being the founder of American cultural anthropology or more broadly as the father of “American Anthropology.” Many anthropologists at the time were called “arm-chair” academics, meaning that they studied anthropology from a distance while sitting in chairs, reading and thinking; Morgan was not an “arm-chair” anthropologist. He went out into the field to learn about other cultures. As noted by Kinton, Jacob Bachofen and John McLennan influenced Morgan (1974:4).
In his essay, “What is Culture?”, Kluckhohn explains the differences and similarities amongst world’s peoples. To support his explanation of the differences and similarities he provides the concept of culture. It is difficult to give this concept a precise definition because the word “culture” is a broad term. Kluckhohn allows the reader to understand the concept of culture by providing examples of cultural differences along with some anthropological evidence to support his views.
In this research I will discuss the anthropological theorists of Clifford Geertz and of Julian Steward in regards to their ideas of culture, the environment and specifics related to each theorist ideas such as meaning and behavior. A brief overview of their respective backgrounds will be given to frame the discussion and add context to Geertz and Stewards perspectives .Furthermore, this paper will connect the ways other theorists have influenced Geertz and Steward in shaping their own understanding of culture and theories related to culture. And ultimately compare and contrast the two perspectives to each other.
In Clyde Kluckhohn's passage, adapted from his book, Mirror for Man, we are given an illumination of anthropology on the concept of culture. He explains that culture is not only derived by "the way we are brought up," but also personal past experiences and the biological properties of the people concerned. As humans we have learned to adapt to our own personal surroundings and have conditioned ourselves and our life styles to revolve around such surroundings by the most comfortable means possible.
Franz Boas has been considered by many as the "Father of American Anthropology", as he was a pioneer in breaking down the American isolationism, intolerance and misinformation about and biological diversity and linguistics.