Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A major reason for establishing an internal audit
Effectiveness of internal auditing
Internal auditing and external auditing relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A major reason for establishing an internal audit
or unwilling to take on the case. This could be due to the difficulty in prosecuting these types of cases, the limited resources available within the agency, the relatively small amount of money stolen (too low to devote resources), or any other number of reasons. If no criminal charges are filed, the organization may have to hire a lawyer to sue for the return of the stolen funds, which can be an expensive and time-consuming process.
Funds recovery
The board chair has a fiduciary responsibility to attempt to have the funds returned. Nevertheless, it is also important for the board chair to do its best to determine which of the following options make sense, given the facts and circumstances of the issue. Some of the common considerations may include: To examine whether the cost of seeking the
…show more content…
A good internal audit mechanism helps in detecting the frauds at an early stage so that the financial losses may be minimized. Operational audits can be taken up to review the effectiveness, efficiency, and economy of operation. It helps in identifying the risks faced by the organization and has an opportunity to improve controls. The external auditor should also try to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions using which audit evidence is provided. Sudden checks have to be planned by the management to keep the staff alert and updated. The audit unit should be established separately, and proper vigilance and guidance are to be provided to them in order to check the frauds at an early stage. The staff, management and the executive officers of the organization have to work for the common good of all the stakeholders of the organization and should follow moral and ethical values while carrying on their
The principles of the AICPA Code of Conduct should guide the work that Jose and Emily do as auditors. The principles that specifically apply to this situation are Responsibilities, The Public Interest, and Due Care. CPAs have the responsibility to “exercise sensitive professional and moral judgments in all activities.” (Mintz, p. 19)
Chief Fortier’s execution of management created disharmony within the department from the onset of his administration. Understanding that the department was loosely managed with “a hands-off approach, preferring to leave matters to the officers and detectives themselves with an appeal to their sense of professional integrity” (Cordner, 2014), the forced implementation of recommendations identified in the Ralph Anderson Audit while initiating change for the better of the department, created an us v. you mentality, where adherence to the changes were made at the onset to gain position only to block and stonewall any further changes.
Adefemi started the meeting by introducing the audit team and explained that this meeting is about the Preliminary Audit Finding II (Prelim II) for the Program 9102, 9115 and 9161.
This formal complaint involves a challenge to the Promotion Board program used by GardaWorld Federal Services/Aegis in Kabul, Afghanistan. The selection of Complex Supervisor, Guard Site Supervisor, and Guard Force Commander for promotion. Furthermore, by going into detail, the challenged procedures involved what is known as unethical practices/biases and procedural failures dating back to December 2014 – April 2018. According to the instructions given by GardaWorld Federal Services Standard Operating Policies and Procedures CAS Promotion Policy SOP 104 December 2014 - January 2017.
Objectivity also needs to be evaluated to make sure the internal audit is reliable. The internal audit needs to be free of conflicting responsibilities as well
Work with proper authorities to right the wrongs. Admitting to authorities about the internal error found will help secure good faith. Try to take all steps suggested to work with proper authorities and minimize penalties. Legal counsel needs to investigate and secure assistance in all jurisdictions that have been affected by this situation. Progress needs to be tracked and communicated to leadership and audit teams weekly by legal counsel.
According to the article authored by Mark Rupert, what are the seven best practices in the roles and responsibilities of an internal audit function?
Equity traps in education are ever-present dangers/temptations for faculty and administration alike. Since these traps involve placing blame on others or other organizations, they are very seductive. However, the tools of high-quality teaching can help instructors avoid—or free themselves—from such equity traps.
In my opinion, fraud vulnerability of the selected organization had been assessed in a systematic way which helped the auditors in giving constructive suggestions for fraud prevention and detection in this case. The overall approach and methodology is very educative and it could be replicated in other environments too.
The three main stages of the audit process are the pre-audit, audit, and post-audit. During the pre-audit the most important things are planning and execution. The first part of the pre-audit is scheduling the audit. Every facility in the organization will need to be audited so creating a schedule will allow for preparation time. Production schedules, management schedules, vacation time, and time between audits are all important and this needs to be organized to have an efficient audit. Proper communications goes hand in hand with scheduling. The auditor needs to communicate all that will be expected prior the audit to ensure that employees or other considerations are in place. The next thing that needs planned for is the number of auditors.
It is important for a company to control fraud risks in any departments whether it is internal fraud or stock fraud. It’s important to put controls in place to protect company reputation and assets.
The main role in relation to fraud prevention is the operation of appropriate systems of internal controls, with proper segregation of duties and good corporate governance (this reflects the culture and practices of the organisation). The auditor has to assess and report on the adequacy of these systems of internal controls and segregation of duties. This gives confidence to the users of the financial statements of how the organisation operates on a daily basis. Auditors are in a way act as eyes and ears for users of financial statements into an organisation. They offer both an insight into an organisation and are supposed to act as protector of the law ensuring proper accounting standards
The oversight responsibilities of the board, the CAE lacking of expertise or broad understanding of financial controls and responsibilities, and the understaffed internal audit functions lacking of independence and direct access to the board of directors contributed to the absence of internal controls. To begin with, the board should be retrained to achieve financial literacy to review financial reporting. Other than attending formal meetings, the board of directors should be more involved with the management. For the Audit Committee, the two members who were recruited as acquaintances to Brennahan need be replaced with experts who are more sufficiently knowledgeable about accounting rules beyond merely “financially literate”. Furthermore, the internal audit functions need to expand with different expertise commensurate with the expanded activities of the organization, testing financial reporting rather than internal controls from an operational perspective. The CAE should be more independent and proactive to execute audit plans, instead of following orders from the CFO, and initiate a direct and efficient communication between internal audit and audit
...on unearths the risks facing the organization and brings to light the true state of the control and governance processes in the organization as well as proposing the changes to be effected. Therefore, in United Arab Emirates, auditors operate in two distinct capacities. Firstly, irrespective of whether the auditor is internal or external, he carries out a thorough, independent and objective examination of the activities of the organization ranging from financial to the ethical practices disclosing their appropriateness. Secondly, the auditor is regarded as an agent of the much awaited change because he not only reports his findings from his audit but also advises on how the situation can be improved to better the current situation. However, despite all these evolvements on the functions of auditors in UAE, compliance remains auditor’s primary role in any enterprise.
Jacob is disappointed and his situation has left him with a decision on what to do with the money. This case study will pinpoint Jacob’s ethical dilemma and what ethical action he should take. Also, the roles and responsibilities of an employee dealing with an ethical situation, as well as the ways of an organization to maintain ethical practices in the workplace, will be discussed. By doing so, Jacob will maintain his honesty and not let his personal interest be in the way resulting trust within the workplace will be maintained.