More handpicked essays just for you.
Mike rose blue collar brilliance summary
The importance of formal education for building a successful career
Blue collar brilliance mike rose opposition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mike rose blue collar brilliance summary
In the article “ Blue-Collar Brilliance” the author Mike Rose, was obviously arguing that just because some jobs requires less schooling than others, it doesn’t mean that their jobs use less brain, intelligent and less thought process in their profession. To argue his theory Rose told us about his mother, about how when he was younger, he observe his mother as a waitress at a coffee shop and family restaurant. Rose told us how his mother loves her being a waitress and how her job required her to use her memory and knowledge. As rose stated “my mother kind of work demand of both body and brain” (245) His mother also learned how long each dish is suppose to take before its ready to be serve, and his mother also learned human skills. For example, if there was a problem at work she would knew how to solve them, while she’s still doing her job as an employer. To furthermore his explain his theory; Rose tells reader about …show more content…
To most people that mean, if someone didn’t complete a certain type of schooling they are consider to be stupid, brainless, and mindless or as Rose quoted in his article “ a bunch of dummies” (247). Most of the time the level of education that is required for someone to complete, to be consider “ intelligent, smart, brilliant” is usually 4 years of college. In today in economy, many people cannot afford to go to college and pursue a higher education. Correction, many people are unable to purchase college textbooks. So just because they cant offered school does that make them less intelligent than someone who does have the money too. As far as I’m concerned mike Rose mother was a waitress psychologist. Mike stated his mother “ take account the emotional state of her co-worker” and “ customers who entered the restaurant with all sorts of needs from psychological ones, including the emotional that accompany hunger to a sometimes complicated desire for human contact”
When analyzing the article “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” written by Mike Rose, and the article “Shop Class as Soulcraft,” by Matthew B. Crawford, you can see several differences in the strategies they use. Rose’s text was an educational article about the intelligence gained through manual labor trades. Roses intended audience is the well educated, professional class, as well as educators, and individuals working in white collar jobs. His purpose is to prove that not all blue-collar workers need an education to succeed and to bust the stereotype that blue-collar individuals can gain the essential skills and education from their jobs. Crawford also based his article around blue-collar work, he mainly focuses on the values the craftsman, being a craftsman
As mentioned before, he based all of his facts off of his own opinions. Dale uses only 2 pieces of statistical evidence to backup his claim. If this assumption were to become something that everyone believed, people would not get the education they would need to have a successful career life. A lot of people would become jobless because all the low level jobs would not need anymore employees. The higher up jobs would be lacking in business because no one would meet the requirements to work for the companies. Reviewing the article, Dale forgets to point out that a lot of people that go to college become successful. Yes, college isn’t right for everyone, but most of the time, the only way for people to have a successful lifestyle is to go to college.
“Technology is nothing. What’s important is that you have faith in the people, that they’re basically good and smart, and if you give them tools, they’ll do wonderful things with them”. This quote perfectly conveys Karen Ho’s perceptive that is present, in her article “Biographies of Hegemony”. In her article, she provides another understanding of intelligence. She uses the case of Wall Street workers and their personal and educational backgrounds to make her case. “Implicit in this transformation from undergraduate to investment banker is Wall Street's notion that if students do not choose Wall street postgraduation, they are somehow “less smart”, as smartness is defined by continued aggressive striving to perpetuate elite status” (Ho 18). Ho’s conception of the educational system has been narrowed down to the social norms that society places. Smartness is merely associated with individuals who go to the best Ivy League Schools, medical schools, law schools, and etc. If a student is attending such institute they
They require to have intuition as well as knowledge and sometimes personal skills. The author of Blue-Collar Brilliance, Mike Rose, uses the story of his mother and uncle. He disagrees with the statement, “Intelligence is closely associated with formal education.” To support his disagreement he talks about how skilled his mother and uncle are, without continuing their education. Mike uses rhetorical questioning in his mother’s point of view at her job in the fast paced job. The assumption of the quote “work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence”. Mike Rose argues with that by saying ” intelligence is closely associated with formal education– the type of schooling a person has, how much and how long –and most people seem to move comfortably from that notion to a belief that work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence”. In another words, Mike Rose saying that most people think that blue-collar jobs are for “stupid” people. Reasoning with that quote he can justify why he is disagreeing with such a statement. He telling his audience how his uncle dropped out of high school, and continued his life, until he became supervisor of General Motors. He is trying to tell us that his uncle has authority without advanced education. Mike supports this by saying his uncle had more hands-on experience and knowledge in his field than anyone would learn in a college. I agree and disagree at the same time, because I believe that people learn way more when they learning by doing with their hands than in a classroom. But when you start your career without education it takes more years and tough moments, because in our world there’s so much new technologies coming up. Having a job is a big journey of trials and errors without education. Going to college will help people to save time and prevent much mistakes as
In his article, “Blue-Collar Brilliance”, UCLA Professor, Mike Rose, encourages society not to perpetuate the stereotypes that suggest people who work blue-collar jobs are less intelligent than people who work white-collar jobs, by failing to acknowledge the vast array of skills required of a person working a blue-collar job. An additional issue Rose brings up is the assumption many people make, that intellect is defined by the level of education a job requires. Rose addresses this naive assumption when he states, “Affirmation of diverse intelligence is not a retreat to a softhearted definition of the mind. To acknowledge a broader range of intellectual capacity is to take seriously the concept of cognitive variability” (283). Basically, Rose is advocating for society to accept that wisdom and knowledge are not only gained in a classroom, but through everyday experience. Ultimately, Rose is attempting to bring awareness to and eliminate these stereotypes. I agree with Rose’s school of thought on eliminating these inexcusable stereotypes against blue-collar workers intelligence, working to dispel the concept society believes that higher education is better than on-the-job training which is mastered by years of experience, and I personally identified with the fact that some of the smartest people I have ever known have been blue-collar workers.
You have Mike Rose going to college, and his family barely got out of high school. Another one is where you have what school teaches you and what on the job teaches are different a lot of time like in the article he says, "For Joe, the shop floor provided what school did not"(Rose, 2017, p4). Joe is Mike uncle, and he dropped out of high school at the ninth grade. The big contrast of the story is the big collar people vs. the people who have the degree, and which one is smarter. His argument for the blue-collar people he went around to people who have blue collar jobs and cataloged the cognitive demands of a range of blue-collar and service jobs to gain a sense of how knowledge and skill develop. For the argument for the other side he did the same thing but for people that have degrees like, for example, people who are scientists, lawyers, entrepreneurs, and other professionals that are rich with detail about the intellectual dimension of their work. They found the people who learn on the job know more about their job than the people who have a degree in their
Why does our society think people who have blue-collared jobs don't need intelligent to work there job? Thats a lie according to Rose:
He claims to relate his mother’s quick and effective decisions, customer interactions, memorisation and problem solving, and his uncle, Joe’s, learning, planning and management skills to that of a white-collar worker. “Preposterous”, some might argue. “You cannot possibly compare waiters and conductors with boffins.” However, the dichotomy between the blue-collars and white-collars are subtle. Regardless of Rose’s claim that blue-collar workers are more efficient and carry a broader skill set, there exists no comparison between the two categories. Granted, the social biases about one’s occupation are irrational; however, blue-collars cannot substitute white-collar workers merely because of their “diverse intelligence”. Given Rose’s experiences, he has colluded blue-collar intelligence with white-collar intelligence. Id Est, he believes that social discrimination against blue-collar workers is fallacious from his observations; thus, their skills are the analogous to white-collar workers. In sum, blue-collar workers are intelligent and important in their respective and applicable fields, and white-collars in theirs’; drawing comparisons between them are like comparing apples and
To work is to solve problems. To solve problems is to learn. To learn is to become intelligent. However, those who work, who solve problems, who learn are considered less intelligent because of their work. Blue collar jobs are frowned upon because of the misconception that they require no intelligence. Blue collar workers learn to work smart by working; they learn to make every move count. The work requires both brain and body.
Blue Collar workers today are looked down upon by most of society. People think that if you have a blue collar job you aren’t smart and not successful. But in my opinion, blue collar workers are the backbone of our society, and deserve the same amount of respect as white collar workers. “Blue Collar Brilliance by Mike Rose” explains how blue collar workers are very smart and use a lot of brainpower to get their jobs done. Both his Uncle and mother were blue collar workers and that’s where he got his inspiration to stand up for blue collar workers around the world. He gives us examples of how his own family members were blue collar workers and how they were smart and how they excelled at their jobs. He uses his own experiences to show us that blue collar workers are in fact smart, able to adapt to many different situations, and deserve respect.
He contributes personal examples and results of clinical tests that argue the misconception of unintelligent blue-collar workers. Rose witnessed the skill and intellect his mother, Rose Meraglio Rose or “Rosie” supplied in order to provide for her family. Especially when Rosie was working in the 50’s of crowded family restaurants, he saw her struggle. Rose observed his mother mastering memory skills to deliver the correct orders and maneuver around her workplace in the most efficient ways. Rosie had to balance many problems on her shoulders, all of which required both mental and physical fortitude. Nonetheless, he still disagrees with the assumption that “Intelligence is closely associated with formal education” (281). Although, this assumption has been implemented throughout history, there are plenty of more social interaction, planning, and problem solving that blue-collars are not credited for. For example, Rose disputes this misconception with the personal study of his uncle, Joe Meraglio. Joe began his journey as a blue-collar after dropping out of the ninth grade to work for the Pennsylvania Railroad. Although he did not receive what most might call a formal education, he eventually joined the Navy
Mike Rose’s article “Blue-Collar Brilliance” talks about people judging other people’s intelligence based on their jobs. Mike Rose explains in his article that people with blue collar jobs are just as intelligent as people with white collar jobs because they both use critical thinking and multi task while they are working. The standard of their jobs might be different because of their different ways of learning. People who are considered professionals or white collared individuals learn by studying or reading reports where blue collared individuals learn by performing a task. They learn faster ways to perform the task after they have done it multiple times. I believe that Rose’s thinking is very effective as it tells us that we should not judge
“Intelligence is closely associated with formal education- the type of schooling a person has, how much and how long- and most people seem to move comfortably from the notion to a belief that work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence” (Rose 276). My Dad has worked blue collar jobs his entire life. Security guard, lawn service, woodworker, carpenter, plus anything else that involves his hands. He didn’t have any schooling past his high school diploma. But he’s always told me, “Yeah, I wish I went to college, but I’m sure as hell glad I was taught and forced to learn the skills I have now. Like doing things on my own and working with my hands, my work ethic, and my ability to absorb as many things as I could to get the job done.” Blue collar jobs can never be outsourced. There will always be a need for plumbers, electricians, machine operators, carpenters and many, many more
Throughout the United States, some types of work are valued highly over others. This stigma strongly associates the idea all career paths without the need of formal education require no cognitive skill and are unable to teach the same principles as a traditional classroom. This also causes the view that blue-careers specializing in a trade are overall lesser than white collar or office work that mandate a college degree. Authors Matthew B. Crawford and Mike Rose both argue this widespread belief is unfair and incorrect in their essays “The Case for Working with Your Hands” and “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” respectively. However, Crawford’s recollection of his own personal experience does not explain the valuable skills and knowledge learned from
The Blue Collar brilliance is a great example of why the white collar jobs are not always the most useful. Blue collar jobs are the people with not so much of the Intelligence but great social skills and other skills not exactly learned. These workers are not dumb at all but they are hard works the labor workers, the workers that did not go to college. The blue collar workers are equally as important to the workforce to make everything function properly. Just because they did not go to college does not take away from what they mean to the workforce.