Bloody Sunday Aggravated Tensions

738 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Catholics in the Northern Ireland conflict

According to the sources, the event of Bloody Sunday aggravated tensions between the Irish nationalist and British forces to a large extent. However, this event was not the first to aggravate tensions and many other smaller events, issues and factors which contributed to this aggravaProtestantted tension.

Source A shows that pre1972 there were multiple events and mistreatments which led to hatred and mistrust between not only the Irish and the British nationalists, but also between the Irish and the Protestants. As stated in source one, Catholic Ireland was ruled by Great Britain for a lengthy period of time despite numerous revolts by the Catholics. The source states that this was a factor which contributed towards the tension as well as …show more content…

According to source A, the British soldiers fired into the unarmed crowd and killed thirteen people. This attack on unarmed civilians resulted in an outcry from the Catholics. This event aggravated tensions immense the Irish nationalists and British forces. (A) The British army stated that their troops had responded after coming under fire however the people of Derry saw it as murder. (B) The first inquiry into the event was led by the British Lord Chief Justice, Lord Widgery in which his description of the days events exonerated the army and made the victims look as if they had initiated the attack. Lord Widgery implied that hand guns and bombs were handled by the victims. However Tony Blair requested a fresh public inquiry in which established the innocence of the victims and held the army responsible for the events. David Cameron also stated that the killings were “unjustified and unjustifiable.” (B) The reason why the first inquiry aggravated tensions between the British forces and Irish nationalists was because the army was not seen at fault but rather the civilians in the march, meanwhile the army was to

Show More
Related

  • Justification of the Colonists' Declaration of Independence from England

    328 Words  | 1 Pages

    Accidents do happen, as shown with the Boston Massacre. The crowds were getting rowdy, made then British soldiers panic, and they opened up fire.

    Read More

  • The Ludlow Massacre: The Battle Of The Colorado Coal Strike

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the morning of the Ludlow Massacre, explosions were set off by the National Guard around 9 o’clock and certain panic ensued. Women and children ran from their tents to the arroyo outside of the town. An exchange of fire began between strikers and guardsmen and continued until around 5 o’clock when the guardsmen began looting striker’s tents and setting them on fire. Twenty lives were lost including two of the striker’s wives and eleven children, but only one of these lives belonged to the National Guard. With this in mind, it can be debated whether or not this event should be considered a battle or a massacre. Some have argued that, because of the striker’s retaliation, the event should be considered battle, but because of previous abuse and the guard’s disregard for who they were firing at it and careless destruction, it should be considered a

    Read More

  • Bloody Sunday and Historical Interpretation from Two Sources

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    that are said like that might not always add up to make sense with an

    Read More

  • Fort Pillow: Was It a Massacre?

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    caused Union officials to call it an outright massacre. Was it a massacre or a result of

    Read More

  • The American Colonists Were Justified In The Revolutionary War

    657 Words  | 2 Pages

    “.the frightened soldiers fired into the crowd.” (Doc 3). As a result of this incident, three people were killed on the scene and two were mortally wounded. The soldiers were also ordered not to fire. The colonists did not think that they should have been shot at or killed, this infuriated them.

    Read More

  • Impact Of Bloody Sunday

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    Civil rights refers to fighting for equal rights for all people and is an important part of history. From time to time, people have been fighting for civil rights for blacks in whites in the mid 1900’s. In fact, Bloody Sunday was probably one of the most important events to have an impact on history for civil rights. Everyday, people struggle to be treated equally and civil rights make it possible for everyone black or white to be treated equally. As a result of Bloody Sunday, this event helped blacks speak up and be heard.

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    There is no doubt that the Boston Massacre leads to the death of five civilians at the hands of British soldiers. During the tea party at the custom house, some of the guard came to informed and me that “the town civilians were assembling to attack the troops, and the bell was ringing as the signal for the purpose.” Wheeler, William B., and Susan D. Becker. "The Trial of Captain Thomas Preston." Discovering the American past. SIXTH ed. Vol. I. BOSTON: CHARLES HARTFORD, nod 80-86.

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre

    2709 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Boston Massacre was and is still a debatable Massacre. The event occurred on March 5, 1776. It involved the rope workers of the colonial Boston and two British regiments, the twenty-ninth and the fourteenth regiments. Eleven people were shot in the incident; five people were killed and the other six were merely wounded. The soldiers and the captain, Thomas Preston, were all put on trial. All were acquitted of charges of murder, however the two soldiers who fired first, Private Mathew Killroy, and Private William Montgomery, the two soldiers were guilty of manslaughter. The causes were numerous for this event. There had been a nation wide long-term dislike towards the British, and a growing hatred towards them by the people of Boston. Even before the two regiments were sent in to monitor Boston there was a growing feud before the two sides.

    Read More

  • British Irish Relations over the past 300 years

    1233 Words  | 3 Pages

    British- Irish relations over the past three hundred years have been troubled. There have been many tensions caused by religion in Northern Ireland and Britain's unfair rule of Northern Ireland. The British are guilty of many of the indignities suffered by the Irish people. They are also guilty of causing all of the religious and territorial conflicts between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland. The division between Northern and Southern Ireland dates back to the 16th century.

    Read More

  • Why Was The British To Blame For The Boston Massacre

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    The British were responsible for the Boston Massacre that happened on March 5 in 1770. The British had shot and killed many people in this tragedy making it one of the greatest events in the American history. Attacking unarmed boys and firing at a crowd where there was no actual danger involved makes the British wrong for committing these actions. These were the reasons why the Boston massacre was the British soldiers fault for all this to

    Read More

  • Causes of the Easter Uprising

    1504 Words  | 4 Pages

    The British occupation of Ireland began in the 1640’s and lasted until 1922. No other occurrence throughout Irish history has had a greater impact on the lives of the citizens of the country. Along with the act of occupation came the emergence of Protestantism, which conflicted with the traditional religion of Ireland, Catholicism. The English occupation of Ireland affected many aspects of Irish history from the potato famine to the War for Independence. However, Irish nationalism came to a boiling point April of 1916, in what is now known as the Easter Uprising. The uprising lasted 6 days and resulted in massive casualties, but furthered the liberation cause for the Irish.

    Read More

  • Why Is Preston Justified In The Boston Trial

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 5th, 1770 in Boston, Massachusetts, a soldier rang a town bell that meant there was a fire or that police backup was needed after being approached by Boston residents who were being hostile towards him. In response to the bell being rung, British commanding officer, Thomas Preston, came to the soldier’s aid with armed British troops. Because the bell also meant “fire,” many residents flooded into the area believing a fire was occurring. A mob broke out, and the hostility of the Boston citizens rose. Objects such as ice and rocks were thrown and many citizens were armed with clubs, sticks, and other objects. At one point, an object hit a soldier, causing his gun to go off. Amidst all of the people screaming “fire,” British troops thought that Preston told them to fire.

    Read More

  • Was The Boston Massacre Really a Massacre?

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 5, 1770, an event occurred in Boston, which consisted of British troops shooting upon colonists. People refer to this as a massacre, but they only look at one side of the story. The Boston Massacre in 1770 was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society). British soldiers went to America to keep the people of Boston in order. However, the soldier's presence there was not welcomed by the Bostonians and this made things worse (Boston Massacre History Society). The British had to fire their guns because the Bostonians were antagonizing the soldiers, which caused five people to die. The Bostonians made the soldiers feel threatened so in turn they acted in self-defense. The British soldiers and their Captain had to go through a trial, to prove they were not to blame for what had occurred.

    Read More

  • What Really Happened in the Boston Massacre?

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... to a miscommunication between the Captain and his soldiers. If the crowd had not been in such an uproar the Boston Massacre never would have happened. With all the testimony and the deposition from the Captain, the jury made the correct decision by determining Preston innocent.

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre

    1417 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, events are sparked by something, which causes emotions to rise and tensions to come to a breaking point. The Boston Massacre was no exception; America was feeling the pressure of the British and was ready to break away from the rule. However, this separation between these two parties would not come without bloodshed on both sides. The British did not feel the American had the right to separate them from under British rule, but the Americans were tired of their taxes and rules being placed upon them and wanted to succeed from their political tyrants. The Boston Massacre would be the vocal point in what would be recognized, as the Revolutionary War in American history and the first place lives would be lost for the cost of liberty. Even though the lives were lost that day, eight British soldiers were mendaciously accused of murder when it was clearly self-defense. People who are placed in a situation where their lives are threatened have the right to defend themselves. History does not have the right to accuse any one event those history may have considered the enemy guilty when they are fighting for their lives.

    Read More

More about Bloody Sunday Aggravated Tensions

Open Document