Blindness In Blind

1026 Words3 Pages

Blindness as Foresight
Siobhan Barton
107248031
Essay 3

Jose Saramago’s Blindness depicts an epidemic that strips humans of sight without warning and leaves the subject vulnerable to both physical and emotional peril. The novel, which follows the lives of several unnamed people struck blind in an unspecified country, uses an ambiguous yet hauntingly familiar allegory to illuminate the fragile social reality in which we live and the animalistic instincts we refuse to acknowledge. Using sight as a literal and metaphorical symbol for social contract, Saramago suggests that absence of sight leads to self-reflection and illuminates social responsibility.
Thomas Hobbes wrote in Leviathan that men are in an equal state of nature. Because of this equality, men are “willing, when others are so too, as far forth as for peace and defence of himself he shall think it necessary, to lay down this right to all things; and be contented with so much liberty against other men as he would allow other men against himself" (XIV). It is from our state of nature, or our instinctual need to preserve ourselves, he says, that humans develop a social contract of governing rules which governs society rather than the individual (XIV). In Blindness, society begins to crumble because it cannot govern the blind the same way it governed the seeing, and the social contract is reset.
In light of the iconoclastic illness, Saramago forces his characters to consider the causes and effects of each decision, and puts into perspective how each individual action has a social reaction. The car thief, knowing no one can see him, succumbs to his animal instincts and gropes of the girl with the dark glasses. In retaliation, she punctures his leg with her heeled...

... middle of paper ...

...r individuality. Upon realizing he or she is part of a larger group, the blindness makes it apparent that one must assume a certain responsibility for his or her actions. As we saw with the car thief, to act selfishly without consciousness of our actions is inconsistent with survival.
“Perhaps only in a world of the blind will things be what they truly are” (291). Saramago introduces an unexplained and seemingly random epidemic of blindness to illuminate that current society functions solely because it operates upon efficient symbiosis. By depriving humans of only one corporeal faculty, Saramago turns society upside down. If his book had a thesis, it would be that one small change in functionality could send us spiraling into primitivism, and in order to preserve humanity, it is our job to act only according to the consequences we are willing to see come to pass.

Open Document