Blemishes In Levius 21: 16-24

736 Words2 Pages

Disabilities are difficult to categorize because they are socially constructed, at least to some extent. What was considered a blemish during the writing of the Hebrew Bible has changed throughout time. The list of blemishes in Leviticus 21:16-24 was expanded in the Qumran scrolls which lists nearly 150. In this case, the list in Leviticus 21:16-24 was taken as a symbolic reference of essentially all disabilities, instead of a fixed list. How the list should be viewed and categorized has given way to a variety of explanations. Most scholars have said that the list is fixed. They differed over categorizing the twelve blemishes as being visible since all blemishes aside from the “crushed testicle” can be seen. Scholars also debate if the list …show more content…

Jacob Milgrom, explained in Leviticus 17-22: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, that a crushed testicle is included with the other blemishes in order to create a “structural and thematic parallelism between the priestly list and the animal list which includes multiple blemishes involving the animal’s genitals (Lev 22:24).” A crushed testicle disrupts the claim that the blemishes are visual and helps show that it was arbitrarily chosen to match the animal list. Schipper and Stackert, on the other hand, rejected that the lists are similar and modified the claim that the list is of observable blemishes. They affirm that the blemishes are visible traits and that the crushed testicle, while not visible, because it is covered with holy garments required to be worn, fits in this “visible” category because it is a blemish that is still observable to the divine. The central piece of the work of Schipper and Stackert is their interpretation of why priests who have blemishes cannot perform tasks at the altar. Like it has been mentioned, priests are required to wear specific holy garments or they cannot officiate at the altar. The garments, however, are made out of the same materials as the curtain of the Tabernacle, therefore, allowing them to blend in. Drawing minimized visible attention is critical for priests while performing their duties, so that they do not draw attention away from the glory of God. The physical blemishes …show more content…

As in the case of the priestly blemishes, at issue are the deity’s preferences and expectations, which are defined here visually. The sacred vestments allow the priest to “blend in” with the sanctuary itself as he performs his service, making him as unobtrusive as possible as he attends to the divine sovereign and his desires. Yet the sacred vestments do not entirely conceal the priest from divine perception; this is not their purpose, and as we have seen already, they are inadequate to meet such a goal. Rather, they serve as a sort of camouflage, diminishing the priest’s conspicuousness so that he not rouse the deity’s

Open Document