Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does the media change opinion in society
Role of media in shaping society
Role of media in shaping society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does the media change opinion in society
In the United States of America the President Obama plans to make birth control free and accessible to all women. This will give equal opportunities to women to control their body the way they want to. Yet controversy has arisen, with this topic, males are speaking up and so is the Catholic Church. This topic has sparked a great debate on women free use of birth control. This topic is important because women 100 years ago had very little rights; in the present women have much more rights. Yet as we move into the future, men and women are still not equal. With the controversy of birth control becoming free through health plans gives women the ability to have control over their bodies.
The three articles were provided on the course link website. Yet I read over the topic provided and chose the topic that spoke to me that most. I found that this was a very relevant topic in today’s society. These articles are also resent not spanning any father then 2012. These articles also bring the perspective of all three parties involved in this issue; women, men, and Catholic Church. The scholarly sources I found on the university of Guelph library website on the journal article databases. The types of discourse that will be used in this paper is foucauldian discourse analysis. Founcualdain states that freedom is an essential for ethics, this topic discusses that women should have the freedom to have access to birth control (Holmes, O'Byrne, & Gastaldo, 2006). This is a power struggle between women free use of birth control over the Catholic Church and males. The medium that will be used in this discourse analysis is Newspapers. This is a political debate, and law that will be passed, the newspapers will best give the options and new cover...
... middle of paper ...
...r side of the debate. Yet I do not agree at all with the information presented. Religion should be separated from the state, especially in the present time. When religious beliefs hinder on the rights of people they should not be changing minds of the state.
I found that the side of birth control should be free for all had a stronger argument. It showed that the views of non-free birth control was sexist and old fashioned in it ways, the only point that was made in the article by the New York Times was that it went against the Catholic religion. The pro free birth control side backed up the false statement with studies, and showing social changes of minds over the year about sexual intercourse. The second article was also addressed to males explaining the changes of sexual intercourse over the time and think that birth control should not be subsidized is archaic.
The choice of religion belongs solely to the individual and shouldn’t be able to be taken away from a
“She may be unmarried or in a bad marriage. She may consider herself too poor to raise a child. She may think her life is too unstable or unhappy, or she may think that her drinking or drug use will damage the baby’s health” (126). The emotional appeal in this paragraph could make the reader think they are pro-choice. Apart from their use of pathos, the authors do a great job using a mixture of both ethos and logos. Page 130 is an example of both, which were used expertly to help the reader understand their point of view and the
Internationally, issues revolving around the female body and reproduction are extremely controversial. For a woman, her body is a very private matter. At the same time, however, a woman's body and her reproduction rights are the center of attention in many public debates. Several questions regarding women's reproductive rights remain unanswered. How much control do women have over their bodies? What kind of rules can be morally imposed upon women? And who controls the bodies of women? Although the public continues to debate these topics, certain conclusions can been made concerning women and their reproductive rights. An undeniable fact is that government has a large degree of control over female reproductive organs. All around the world, time and time again, several national governments have implemented policies, enacted laws, and denied women control over their reproductive organs. Several governments have crossed the border between intimate and public matters concerning women's reproductive organs, by making laws about contraceptives, abortion, and family planning programs.
amongst women with respect to the issue of birth control. According to Davis, a women 's
Subsequently, the provided documents on the birth control movement did show the push and pull factors of the complicated and multifaceted debate. Americas push towards industrial growth, and technology demanded that the subsequent progressive reforms were needed for a society ushering in a new era. At the same time, fear and reluctance to abandon tradition and religious custom acted as the pulling factor. The birth control debate was a complicated and heavily charged debate teemed in religious, social, political, and racial rhetoric. Historical documents help shed new light on the things taken for granted today, even the most seemingly innocuous things like birth control were fought for, so that men and women today could be in charge of their own destinies.
When legally introduced to society in 1960, the Pill stirred up a long period of controversy. The availability of the Pill had great impact on women’s health, social life, laws, religion, family, relationships, morality and sexuality. Initially conceived to be highly effective and safe, the Pill left many women with side effects – few which led to several fatalities. Before the Pill was created, many women postponed sex due to the social norm and fear of becoming pregnant before marriage. Families grew large and it was typical for a woman to have multiple children caused by the lack of birth control. Due to regulations, such as the Comstock laws, many people supported the prohibition of the Pill and other family planning practices. However, many women believed in the right to control their own body when it came to procreation. Despite the controversies, the Pill left lasting impacts, such as by opening society to the sexual revolution and...
In this mind baffling speech by Margaret Sanger, she explains the importance of attaining birth control as a female. She believes that “birth control should be available to every adult man and woman” (The Morality of Birth Control). In her opinion, every person over 18 should at least obtain knowledge of it, and try to practice it as much as possible. “Not only will birth control reduce the rate of disease and famine, it will also help heighten the standards of civilization towards teen pregnancy and child abortion” (Population Growth and Resource Depletion). Only then will people attain real morality.
Welcome to America: land of opportunity and most importantly, free. Well, unless you're a young, possibly teenage girl seeking birth control. We have people with extreme morals and religious beliefs making those decisions for you! Let us not forget the people saying sex education is tainting our youth's brains, yet wonder why they lack the basic knowledge on STDs. Remember, "Choice is an essence of personal freedom," (Brooks, ...About Life Control). Therefore leading to the point that birth control should be complimentary to all.
Imagine in today in America’s hyper-sexualized society, not being provided with any knowledge about contraception or sex education. Before Margaret Sanger’s activism, most women were in this position of oblivion about their own bodies. In “Morality of Birth Control”, Sanger argues effectively for the legalization and acceptance of both birth control and sex education using ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen her argument.
No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.
The Morality of Birth control originally surfaced as a pamphlet in 1918, which questioned the morality of denying knowledge surrounding a drug which could prevent pregnancy women. In 1913 Margaret Sanger worked as a nurse in a New York. There Sanger watched one woman fall ill from a household abortion. The doctor told this women to avoid pregnancy she should “have her husband sleep on the roof” (Richmond Edu, Par. 7). A few months later Sanger found the same women dead after a second self-inflicted abortion. This horrendous event pushed Sanger to advocate a right she believed all woman should have.
Sanger, Margaret. "The Morality of Birth Control." Gifts of Speech. Smith College, 2012. Web. 15 Dec. 2013.
...point as well. The essay knows that before a woman is pregnant, that even being willing to have sex she is taking a chance. Health wise, society does not hold a concern to how abortion emotionally and physically damages a person, their only reasoning given to what causes their pain after abortion is guilt, which seems to be stereotypical. The case of Roe v. wade holds a logical point by being optional to consider abortion, and if so, will only be safely done through the first trimester of pregnancy to avoid, health issues. My perspective to oppose abortion is similarly relative on the analysis of health reasoning, but my views are also opinionated by the environment I grew upon by. Each abortion guideline is openly acceptable to live by, but the moral of the perspectives carries on what our society as a free citizen lies between: healthcare and freedom of speech.
With so many women choosing to have abortions, it would be expected that it would not be so greatly frowned up, yet society is still having problems with its acceptance. Every woman has the fundamental right to decide for herself, free from government interference, whether or not to have an abortion. Today, more than ever, American families do not want the government to trample on their right to privacy by mandating how they must decide on the most intimate, personal matters. That is why, even though Americans may differ on what circumstances for terminating a crisis pregnancy are consistent with their own personal moral views, on the fundamental question of who should make this personal decision, the majority of Americans agree that each woman must have the right to make this private choice for herself. Anti-choice proposals to ban abortions for “sex-selection” or “birth-control” are smokescreens designed to shift the focus of the debate away from this issue and trivialize the seriousness with which millions of women make this highly personal decision. Any government restriction on the reasons for which women may obtain legal abortions violates the core of this right and could force all women to publicly justify their reasons for seeking abortion.
American society has come a long way in identifying and defending women’s human rights and humanity. However, women will always be essentially different than men because of their ability to convey with children. We are reminded of this by current political debates concerning abortion and contraception, which some have called a “war on women”. The transformation of gender relations since the beginning of the 20th century is one of the most rapid change in human history. Men had legal powers over the lives of their children and wives. Wife beating was never strictly legal in the Unites States. The ruling of men over women had emerged by the end of the 18th century. The movement for the right