Blah

1246 Words3 Pages

Alexander, a man born roughly 2,300 years ago, lived a tale that demanded to be told, and told again. Men obliged, passing along the legend of Alexander orally for decades until the first surviving sources were penned. The echoes of Alexander’s influence can be heard today and his legend will last for centuries to come. Many worshippers (literally and figuratively) of this great conqueror mention his inheritance in passing without examining it in detail. King Philip II of Macedon, a man mostly known as father of Alexander the Great, left his son with that inheritance which most boys will never see: an empire. King Philip found Macedonia a scrapheap of citizen-soldiers and left it Europe’s first territorial nation-state. Philip II was greater than Alexander the Great, namely because Alexander’s inheritance, too often glossed over, was pivotal to his own success
Alexander’s opportunity for greatness was facilitated by Philip’s forming of the first territorial nation-state within Europe. Before King Philip’s arrival onto the Macedonian scene, his people were more tribal and disparate. Philip II urbanized Macedonia, amassed its wealth, and quickly turned it into the richest and most powerful state in ancient Greece. It’s ludicrous to even imagine the Macedon of 360BCE launching a military campaign into Asia Minor; King Philip left Macedon with the food, money, troops, political unity, and civic institutions to facilitate successful conquest.
King Philip created a political environment necessary for Alexander’s greatness. He formed the first European empire under one constitution and united the hundreds of independent Greek city-states under Macedonian rule. Any scholar of ancient or classical Greece is markedly impressed by this unif...

... middle of paper ...

...er it becomes that Philip was the greater man. Over half a century, two kings conquered respective swaths of land. Philip did so slowly, forging Europe’s first nation-state in the process. He united hundreds of separate city-states into a federally-administered proto-empire, using force where he felt compelled and diplomacy where he could. He established a complex system of power and logistics that made future conquest possible. Alexander, in turn, conquered all of the Levant, Bactria, Anatolia, Persia, and Egypt in the span of a decade. He slaughtered thousands and defeated the strongest known armies. He personally cut down his enemies in battle, diving into the fray so often as to be seriously wounded seven times. Yet Alexander’s empire crumbled into pieces within weeks of his death; Philip’s empire made Alexander’s success possible. Greatness begets greatness.

Open Document