In conclusion, Monsanto is destroying the genetic integrity of most naturally grown foods, ruining the life style of many small farmers who depend on their crops to make a living, and are stealing money from people who have Monsanto’s corn on their land just from natural cross breeding of plants. The public needs to hear about what Monsanto is doing. Their website seems perfectly happy and makes them seem super good and environmentally friendly but that’s what is made to do. They only tell you what they want you to hear not what you need to hear.
When the British were in control of India, they changed the economy for the worse and caused poverty through demanding the growth of cash crops and importing cheap fabric. The British did build 10,000 miles of railroad track, effectively creating jobs and transportation in India (Lalvani). This was a respectable achievement, nevertheless, the tracks led to massive economic shifts. Indians were forced to grow cash crops in replace of their regular food, sending things like indigo and cotton to Britain (Doc. 7). As a result of this switch, Indians were pushed into poverty when Britain no longer wanted to buy their crops. Not only were cash crops inedible and unsellable, they drained the soil of its nutrients so farmers couldn’t grow more food
Monsanto is one of the first chemical companies to apply the biotechnology industry business model to agriculture, it is also well known for their controversy in producing genetically modified seeds for crops. This kind of system concerns some stakeholders about the negative effect on the environment and ecosystem while growing GMO seeds and the possibility that it will affect health. On the other hand, the system helps some farmers in preventing loss crop yield and increasing revenue, especially farmers in developing countries, even though this is yet to be proven. (https://stakeholderdoce.wordpress.com/)
The farmer’s lack of access to loans limit their ability to invest in improved inputs. Farmers in
The failure of achieving this is mostly attributed to infrastructural and technological lack. The logic has been of concentration of agricultural production to a limited range of cash crops instead of traditional practices emphasising mixed cropping of cash and non-cash crops leading to “a steady decline of traditional agro-ecosystems in India.” (Damodaran : 2001). As Vandana Shiva, Ashok Jafri and Afsar H Jafri also point out, the shift in agriculture post globalisation is towards monoculture, moving away from mixed cropping practices. This in turn reduces the ecological diversity ensured through mixed cropping leading to ecological degradation. Moreover, there are other social implications. As noted by A Damodaran, in ‘WTO Agriculture Agreement, Common Property Resources and Income Diversification Strategy’, “many incidents of farmers’ suicides in north-west and south India during 1998-2000 have also been attributed to unguarded shifts in cropping pattern, resulting in crop failures.” Further, informal loan economy is intimately connected to the small farmers who do not have capital to invest in technology and end up borrowing from local moneylenders at exhorbitant interest rates. The indebtedness of farmers is one of chief reasons for farmer suicides. The social cost of such agricultural practices gets highlighted through these
Historically, Monsanto was a drug and chemical company, most commonly recognized as the producer of NutraSweet and Equal (Monsanto, 2015). However, it is not as commonly known, but they are also the producer of “Agent Orange”, which was used during the Vietnam War and wrecked havoc on our soldiers nervous systems (Baird, 2015). Unfortunately, many are still dealing with the effects of this drug. Moreover, Monsanto was responsible for the highly toxic pesticide DDT, which was banned in the US in 1972; polychlorinated biphenyl industrial lubricants, banned in the US in 1979; and rBST, the controversial bovine growth hormone to boost milk-production in cows, all of which resulted in legal claims relating to health and environmental damage caused by its products or practices and has had to make substantial payouts (Baird, 2015). Now, they are genetically modifying (GM) seeds, which produce the world’s food (Monsanto, 2015).
Agriculture of India if compared with outer world is yet primitive. The farmers in India are not able to
Monsanto started out as a company that created an artificial sweetener for a well-known company called Coca-Cola. Throughout the last century with the use of new types of innovation the corporation has set out to change the world and has set a specific goal to change the way food is grown. Through the agriculture industry Monsanto has created new technology that enables farmers to grow food faster and with less land area. Although the results seem to be positive, there are also critics of this new way of agriculture and health implications are unknown for now. Business Ethics states, “In 1981 Monsanto leaders determined that biotechnology would be the company’s new strategic focus” (Farrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, pg. 383).
Unfortunately, in Pakistan farmers are poor and they have low level of incomes. Agriculture credit facilities are not common and easily available. Inadequate loan, high interest rate and untimely availability impact adversely crop productivity. That’s why poor farmers borrow from landlords and middlemen in Pakistan. It has been estimated that 50.8% farmers borrow from landlords at high interest rate (Khan 2012). In Pakistan, small farmers having 2 ha of land generally do not get credit facilities therefore they are unable to use the quality inputs. In this way, they get low crop yields. Limited availability of financing credits results in low agriculture productivity (Planning Commission
In hindsight, the use of Monsanto’s Bt cotton is actually helping the Indian economy. The yield of cotton overall has increased by 34-42% per hectare while the usage of insecticides has decreased by 31-52%. One of the issues of using Bt cotton was the increase in production cost as the price of the transgenic seeds was higher by 15% but this was rectified as the income generated by the cultivation of Bt cotton is about 53-71% higher. This introduction led to the emergence of illegal cotton cultivation using GM seeds even before approval by the regulating authority. Numerous hybrid seeds also emerged that were falsely sold as GM seeds at the higher price to the poor farmers. At some point suicides by farmers was also accused on the cultivation of GM crops. All this chaos led to the moratorium on the cultivation of Bt brinjal in 2010 by public consensus. Because of the past experiences, the Indian population has become skeptical on the use of GM seeds or crops (even though they are effective) leading to a virtual ban. This makes it very important for the Government of India to have a credible, honest and stringent regulatory