Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Regional integration with Caribbean countries
Regional integration with Caribbean countries
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Regional integration with Caribbean countries
The late Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was exceptional in numerous areas of political, social and economic spheres of life, probably more than all the other Latin American politicians. He aimed at joining forces with the Caribbean, in order to unite both regions that he felt had much in common but has continued to be separated by the embedded legacies of Colonialism (Edmonds, 2013). Many renowned writes have written about his momentous contributions made mainly in the economic domains. This article will examine the unique contributions that Chavez has made in the spheres of political economy, social and economic domains and in establishing relations between political leaders in Latin America and the Caribbean. In addition, this paper will estimate his success against the forces of neoliberalism. The paper begins with a popular definition of regionalism and continues with his enduring contributions to the development of Latin American and Caribbean regionalism.
Payne and Gamble define regionalism as ‘a state-led or states-led project designed to reorganize a particular regional space along defined economic and political lines’ (1996, p.2). From the time when Chavez’s election was held in 1999, he had always wished to strengthen the relationship between Latin America and the Caribbean by uniting both regions. Not long after, Chavez began to form strong relationships with the Anglophone Caribbean (Edmonds, 2013). By the year 2009 the Caribbean islands of Antigua, Dominica and St, Vincent had joined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA) which was formerly made up of Venezuela and Cuba (Edmonds, 2013). This Alliance was formed with the aim of eradicating poverty, promoting sustainable development and social justice holding...
... middle of paper ...
... unfortunate people in the Caribbean and all over the world. As Tariq Ali rightfully said, ‘he was one of the political giants of the post-communist era’. The Caribbean, which remains on the margin of the international economy in their times of need received a helping hand from Venezuela and Hugo Chavez. He was not just appreciated in the region for his support, but also for what he embodied. This can be seen in all of the commiserations presented by the Caribbean leaders on behalf of their country. Chavez stood up against bullying by regimes who sought after his downfall. He wanted to construct a society upon harmony and social justice. Comrade Chávez did all that he could for his people of Venezuela as well as for the people of Latin America and in extension the world. He will always be remembered for bringing together as a whole the Caribbean and Latin America.
This paper will be exploring the book The Vanguard of the Atlantic World by James Sanders. This book focuses upon the early 1800 to the 1900 and explores the development of South American political system as well expresses some issues that some Latino counties had with Europe and North America. Thus, Sanders focus is on how Latin America political system changes throughout this certain time and how does the surrounding countries have an effect as well on Latin political system. Therefore, the previous statement leads into some insight on what the thesis of the book is. Sanders thesis is, “Latin American’s believed they represented the future because they had adopted Republicanism and democracy while Europe was in the past dealing with monarchs
Chavez was greatly supported the idea of equality the he “gained national stature as a labor union spokesman” with all the action he would take not only in his community but others as well. He was such an influential person that the people of the US Senate offered him to” have a testimony during an US Senate subcommittee hearing” . While he is there he lets the people know how these migrant farm workers are being treated and what people are able to do to help. His actions that he took changed US History by letting the people know what and how the migrant workers are treated.
Cesar chavez (1927-1993) was a civil rights leader. He is most famous for creating the National Farm Workers Association. Chavez grew up in Arizona on his family’s farm. When the depression hit, Chavez was 11 years old, and his family lost their farm and were forced to become migrant workers. The working conditions on the farms Chavez and his family worked on were horrible. This later inspired him to make a union for farm workers, the National Farm Workers Association. He is known for being an activist of civil rights for Latinos, rights for farm workers, and also for animal rights.
... gain to Spain. He also viewed the Americans that were under the Spanish rule as serfs. Serfs are classified as a member of the lowest feudal class with a status so low that it makes it harder to gain freedom. Bolivar does not agree with absolutism which he feels is another form of slavery. His idea of governance for Latin America is one that is “organized as a great republic”, but he sees this as impossible. Bolivar expresses that it would be nice to have “an august assembly of representatives of republics, kingdoms, and empires to deliberate upon high interest of peace and war with the nations of the other three-quarters of the globe. This type of organization may come to pass in some happier period of our regeneration” (413).
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Today I bring to your forefront of thought, the island of Hispaniola. This island is the namesake for the two countries who run the land, the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Both nations hail from a joint introduction into the world market and post-European colonization, but as time progressed, each one had a different outlook to the world stage. The present day Dominican Republic and Haiti are worlds apart on an island which keeps them together. Their culture is separated by the colonial residuals that lay imbedded into their communities. They are on different sides of the spectrum of structural growth due to the resulting outcomes from decades of political ruling and policy making. On one side we have the second independent state of the Americas,
White, Robert E. 2013. "After Chávez, a Chance to Rethink Relations With Cuba". The New
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
To sum up, Chavez was a man that fought for farmers to be traded better. One of his quotes was “The fight is never about grapes or lettuce. It is always about people”. With this, we can conclude that no matter the kind of strike he had lead, it was always for the people. For example, when he was fighting about the pesticide in grapes or lettuces, the true fight he was leading was always a fight for the people in order to make their lives easier. Maybe his life was not easy as a child working at a young age or maybe it got more complicated as he got older and enter the unions to defend the people that worked on farms, but he got to be a hero among the farmers. More importantly, Chavez got the farmers the momentum they needed in order for them to fight for what they wanted, and in the end, accomplished to get the rights they deserved.
If Chavez would have stood for illegal immigration, I believe, he would have been twice as powerful. Thousands didn't join him in his cause because of his position on that. In spite of that, however, Chavez reached millions and changed the Mexican American society forever.
Fidel Castro led a revolution with the help of Che Guevara and his brother Raul. At the time before the revolution Fulgencio Batista was in power at the time. Many did not agree with his dictator ways. According to The Caribbean: A History of the Region and Its People by Stephan Palmie and Francisco A. Scarano
Filmmaker Oliver Stone embarked on a journey across the Latin American continent pursuant to the filling of gaps left by mainstream media about the social and political movements in the southern continent. Through a series of interviews he conducted with Presidents Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Cristina Kirchner and former president Nėstor Kirchner of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Lula da Silva of Brazil, Rafael Correa of Ecuador and Raúl Castro of Cuba, Stone was able to compare firsthand information from the leaders themselves with that reported and published by the media (“Synopsis,” n.d.). It gives light to the measures these leaders had to take in order to initiate change in their respective countries, even if their public identities were at stake. Several instances in the film showed the mismatch between these two sources, pointing at the US government’s interests for greatly influencing the media for presenting biased, groundless views.
Hugo Chavez was a powerful and positive force in addressing social issues, however, his singular focus on social issues at the expense of other matters of the country left the Venezuelan economy in tatters. In 1998, 50.4% of the Venezuelan population was living below the poverty line, where as in 2006 the numbers dropped to 36.3% (Chavez leaves). Although he aggressively confronted the issue of poverty in Venezuela, many other problems were worsened. Some Chavez critics say he used the state oil company like a piggy bank for projects: funding homes, and healthcare while neglecting oil infrastructure and production. Without growth in the oil ind...
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.
Seligson M. A., 2008, Challenges to Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from the Americas Barometer 2007-2007, USAID