Bernie Sanders And Social Inequality

1128 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of poverty and their definitions

The article that titles; “The thing Bernie Sanders says about inequality that no other candidate will touch” talks about how Bernie Sanders is trying to redistribute a large amount of wealth back from the top 1 percent. He is trying evenly distribute wealth and income between both the top 1 percent and the others that fall below. Bernie Sanders is trying to create an equal opportunity and high quality of life for everyone. He believes that everyone should have a fair chance of education, health, equal income and good quality living conditions. Bernie also believes that this will invite more liberal voters to vote since their needs are now being considered. The article also mentions that many economist believes that polices design to reduce …show more content…

According to The American class structure in an age of growing inequality text, social mobility is “the extent to which people move up or down in the class system, typically measured by occupational status. Intergenerational mobility is the movement of individuals relative to their parents’ position.” (Gilbert, 275). Today, those at the bottom of the social class structure are finding it very have to move up or to make any move at all on the social mobility ladder. Simply because of the income distribution. Income distribution is how the country’s total GDP is distributed against its population. “Income is the inflow of money over a period of time.” (Gilbert, 270). Things such as the economic trends are also contributing factors. Economic trends including things such as low wage jobs, unemployment and the increase of the permanent underclass. They also experience family trends such more divorces and fewer marriages, which results in single parenting. What could make this worst is if the woman is the one left to be the single parent. This is because women receives less pay than men. Receiving minimum wage and having only one income in the house hold will put a strain on trying to take care of children and trying to survive at the same time. All these inequalities then causes them to remain far from the American dream that everyone hopes to …show more content…

Wealth is “the value of assets owned by an individual of family at a point in time. (Gilbert, 277). Even though the rich do pay taxes, it doesn’t affect them as bad as the poor. They are still able to live comfortable because of the propertied that they owned. These properties are sometimes inherited and passed down to them. Not only that, but it is most likely that they also have some sort of savings or safety net to maintain their life style in case anything should happen. The poor on the other hand, even though they have to pay taxes as well, this can affect them drastically. Simply because majority of the time they do not own much. They do not own any property, they do not have any savings or any safety net to help them move forward in case of emergencies of if something should happen. Consequently, they find themselves at times being dependent and depending on the government to help with things such as Medicare and food stamps. This is a major issues Senator Bernie Sanders is trying fix according to the article. He is trying to get the rich to pay higher taxes since they can afford to. Additionally, he is trying to get the issues of the poor to be addressed. They have no say at work. In other words, they have no political power, they are at the bottom and it might seem as if they have to do any and everything in order to earn a dollar to

Show More
Related

  • The Death Of Horatio Alger Analysis

    274 Words  | 1 Pages

    Paul Krugman, in his article “The Death of Horatio Alger” suggests that social mobility among classes in the United States is becoming more difficult by the day. Krugman explains that the idea of the American Dream and moving from class to class was once semi easily attainable; but is now seemingly impossible. Although America is thought of as a classless society, the country has a whole is moving into a caste society run by the rich.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Class In America-2009, By Gregory Mantsios

    1272 Words  | 3 Pages

    Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.

    Read More

  • Gregory Mantsios Class In America Analysis

    795 Words  | 2 Pages

    In "Class in America", Gregory Mantsios says that "when politicians and social commentators draw attention to the plight of the poor, they do so in a manner that obscures the class structure and denies any sense of exploitation." Based off our readings, class discussion and films, income inequality is known to be erased or ignore. Our society frowns upon the expression of income in our daily conversations, as it could be seen braggy or a complaint depending on your status of income. Because it's frowned upon to talk about, the topic of income inequality becomes erased or ignored. In addition, income inequality in America's class structure can affect people's ability to reach their American Dream.

    Read More

  • Inequality in America

    562 Words  | 2 Pages

    has generally lowered, further showing the inequality that exists in our nation. It is usually difficult for the lower classes to achieve financial success because a high income job requires good education which the lower classes lacks because they cannot afford it.

    Read More

  • Bernie Sanders

    2265 Words  | 5 Pages

    Bernard “Bernie” Sanders, is one of the best candidates for this years 2016 presidential election. He is the junior United States Senator from Vermont. He has demonstrated his passion towards an equal and stabilized country. Sanders is a man who believes in a country that is equal and all voices should be heard. Socioeconomic issues are to be heard of by all people because these issues are what make the people and the country. His propositions to a better socioeconomic country will better the relationships we have with one another. Voting for Bernie Sanders, means voting for a country that will be equal to all the people living here. A country deserves to be united by all the people living here regardless of race. We are all human, we all deserve

    Read More

  • Analysis of Economic Inequality In "Ill Fares The Land" and "Justice"

    1130 Words  | 3 Pages

    Economic inequality is ingrained in our society. Because of this fact, many would argue that “that’s just how it is,” but in reality this is not how a community is suppose to function. As Michael Sandel writes in his book Justice, “As inequality deepens, rich and poor live increasingly separate lives.” Sandel makes an excellent point. As economic divisions, such as the ones present in the United States, worsen, the classes diverge on every level. Wealthy people attend different schools, purchase luxury cars, and live in gated communities. Meanwhile, the poor live in squalor, use public transportation, and attend failing schools. Aside from the lack of a quality education making it harder to escape poverty, the poor are from birth at a disadvantage to those on the other side of the economic scale. The United States is not a land of guaranteed equality of result, that is...

    Read More

  • Wealth Inequality In America Essay

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Inside of this video, this guy really targets an issue nobody has really been presented. He shows charts that talk about how we Americans think our wealth is distributed. We think distribution is doing alright. Americans think that the bottom 40% is getting a bit of money. They also believe that the middle class is doing reasonably well. Unfortunately, that is not the case. In the video, he breaks it down a little bit getter. He shows a graph that shows how money is actually being distributed. The poorest of poor don 't even register on the poverty line. The middle class is barely making it. And then there is this huge difference between "the rich" and the poor. It is proven that the 1% of America has 40% of the entire nation 's wealth ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The bottom 80% of America only share 7% of the nation 's wealth among themselves. The top 1% has 50% of the stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. The bottom 50% of Americans only own 0.5% ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The poor is not just getting by but they are scraping and fighting to get by. Now that it is clear that there is a lot of poor people in America, it is important to figure out how to fix

    Read More

  • Importance Of The American Dream

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Henslin social, mobility is the movement of individuals, families and groups from one social position to another (Henslin, 2015, p 237-239). It can be viewed in terms of distribution of resources and power among the different social stratification and its effect on the people involved. Stratification is a ranking system for groups of people that continue unequal rewards and life chances in society. Through stratification, society categorizes people and distributes valued resources based upon these categories (Henslin, 2015,p190). The social status of a person is determined by his or her work how much money they have earned and how they move their way up the social class. Social mobility occurs whenever people move across social class boundaries, from one level to another. Mobility can be up or down on the social class ladder but the American Dream is only upward mobility on the social class ladder. The people in the United States are broken down into classes the rich people on top the poor people in the bottom and the middle class in the

    Read More

  • Social Inequality In The American Dream

    1416 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hence social equality has grown over time. This would not be as consequential of a problem for the American dream if social mobility had stayed the same. Social mobility has decreased over time as well. Social mobility is the ability to move from one social class to another. Sociologically speaking, the American Dream has always been characterized by the ability to gain more social mobility.

    Read More

  • Raising The American Dream In The Short Documentary, Two American Families

    807 Words  | 2 Pages

    Again in the documentary Bill Moyers comes and visits the families after everyone is all grown up, he gets to see what their daily jobs are and their new families. Only one child out of both families made it through college and received a degree. Even with a degree none of the children were successful and were all going through the same struggle their parents faced while raising them. Its all a cycle until someone becomes financially successful to break the chain and from there comes positive results. If you come from a family that is financially stable you are more likely to be financially stable as well. Based on data from “The Equality of Opportunity Project” it states that “children's prospects of earning more than their parents have fallen from 90% to 50% over the past half

    Read More

  • Social Mobility In The American Dream

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    I do not agree with this concept. Many people do not end up being on the same area of the social class ladder as their family is or once was. I believe that social mobility is the main reason as to why the American Dream is no longer available as it once was. There are three different types of social mobility: intergenerational mobility, structural mobility, and exchange mobility. Intergenerational mobility is defined as "the change that family members making in social class from one generation to the next" (Henslin, 237). An example of this would be if a child ended up being part of a different social class than that of their parent 's. Structural mobility is "the movement up of down the social class ladder that is due more to changes in the structure of society than to the actions of individuals" (Henslin, 237). Simply put, structural mobility means that even if an individual is hard working and very intelligent, they still may not end up moving up on the social class ladder. Structural mobility is a huge reason as to why the American Dream is not achievable for all Americans

    Read More

  • Paul Krugman Income Inequality

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gerald, Cathy, and Russel (543) believes that, “The rich separate themselves from everyone else perpetrating their wealth from one generation to the next as nobility of the past century did”.  In this society, it appears that individual feel that, if I go it then you should get it; no one wants to help others. Gerald, Cathy, and Russel (545), emphasizes that, “When income or wealth is taxed at high rates, the rich are not able to save and accumulate as

    Read More

  • Income Inequality In America

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Inequality in America is so much higher now than forty years ago for many reasons. Inequalities generated through exclusion from labor markets, which occurs through marginalization. Marginalization in the United States occurs when there is a mismatch between distribution of skills in the population and distribution of jobs in the economy. (Wright & Rogers: 286-287) Since the United States has deindustrialized there has been a lack of opportunity for people with “low or outmoded skills and low education.” (Wright & Rogers:

    Read More

  • Capitalism and the Common Man

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    While demagogic statements like these have high emotive worth, they reflect resolute, near incurable stupidity about the sources of income. Listening to some of the talk about income differences, one would think that out there somewhere is a pile of money. People who are wealthy just happened to get there first and greedily took an unfair share. Justice requires that they "give back." Or, there's talk about income distribution. The way some people talk, unequal distribution of income means that there is a dealer of dollars who shells out $1,000 to one person, $100,000 to another and a million dollars to yet another. Thus, the reason why some people are wealthy while others are not wealthy is that the dollar dealer is a racist, sexist, a multi-nationalist, or just plain mean. Economic justice requires a re-dealing of the dollars, income redistribution, where the ill-gotten gains of the few are returned to their rightful owners.

    Read More

  • Essay On Income Inequality

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Income inequality continues to increase in today’s world, especially in the United States. Income inequality means the unequal distribution between individuals’ assets, wealth, or income. In the Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes, a liberal journalist, states the inequality gap between the rich and the poor are increasing widening, and there need to have things done - tax the rich, provide better education - in order to shortening the inequality gap. America is a meritocratic country, which means that everybody has equal opportunity to be successful regardless of their class privileges or wealth. However, equality of opportunity does not equal equality of outcomes. People are having more opportunities to find a better job, but their incomes are a lot less compared to the top ten percent rich people. In this way, the poor people will never climb up the ladder to high status and become millionaires. Therefore, the government needs to increase all the tax rates on rich people in order to reduce income inequality.

    Read More

More about Bernie Sanders And Social Inequality

Open Document