Benefits Of Cohabitation
explanatory Essay
1070 words
Cohabitation and Marriage Success Over the past generations cohabitation has increased significantly. Cohabitation is when unmarried couples that are intimate with each other live together outside of marriage. What once used to be unconditionally wrong is now being practiced by intimate couples all over the globe. Although many cultures and religions disapprove of cohabitation, it has become a practiced arrangement for the modern generation of couples. There are many reasons why couples try cohabiting before marriage, one of which being to find out if they can live together happily before the binding commitment of a marriage. NBC News claims that 48% of women have lived with a partner before a wedding, with 40% actually getting married within …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that cohabitation is when unmarried couples that are intimate with each other live together outside of marriage.
- Explains that nbc news claims that 48% of women have lived with a partner before marriage, with 40% getting married within 3 years of deciding to cohabit.
- Explains the benefits of cohabitation, including companionship, financial stability, and less pressure established on the relationship.
- Explains that cohabitation can be viewed as a "try out" before marriage, but sometimes things don't work out. poor money management leads to difficulty paying bills, buying houses, financing cars, and poor credit scores.
- Explains that premarital cohabitation can put couples at a disadvantage for early divorce.
- Explains how different religions approach cohabitation and premarital sex. the roman catholic church considers it a sin, while protestant denominations encourage the couple to marry.
- Opines that cohabitation is more of a "trial" than an step towards marriage. they would like to know pretty much everything about their girlfriend before we get married.
- Explains that public opinion of cohabitation has changed dramatically over the last generation. trial marriage is a preferred way to determine if the relationship is ready for the real deal.
Living together allows you to embrace the company of your partner after work, during free time, and on the weekends. Learning each partner’s living styles will teach how to problem solve as a couple, and will test each others living compatibilities. An example of testing compatibility would be learning all of your partners’ tendencies and pet peeves prior to the commitment of a marriage (Langham). One person may be social and enjoy staying up late while the other likes quiet nights and early bedtimes. When deciding to move in together, money can be a big factor in the decision. The responsibility of paying the bills can be split, making it financially easier for both partners. Cohabitation can serve as a final step for couples that are not yet ready for marriage, but are ready for their relationship to move to the next level (Jacques & Chason). For example, a relationship of 4 years may be getting dull, but if marriage is not an option for whatever reason, cohabitation can act as another step towards marriage without saying the vows quite …show more content…
If the intention of moving in together is eventually to get married, then cohabitation can be viewed as a “try out” before marriage. Sometimes things don’t work out though. Things that were cute at first become annoying, and feelings of neglect creep in (Langham). Little things add up and turn into big incompatibilities, which can eventually lead to heartbreak. And as money can be a reason to cohabitate, it can also be the reason for a breakup as well. Poor money managing leads to difficulty paying the bills, buying houses, financing cars, and poor credit scores. There is virtually no way to detect whether these setbacks will happen in every relationship, which is part of the reason that so many couples of the modern generation are trying cohabitation prior to marriage. People want to know if it is going to work out, before they make the
Related
- comparative
- opinion
- analytical
- explanatory
- Cohabitation Vs. Marital Unionscomparative essayAccording to the research most couples inter into cohabitation because it allows them to postpone their entrance into what would be considered traditional gender-specific marital roles in a family environment. This couples may later either evolve into marriage or break up their cohabitation status. Both marriage and cohabitation are considered "romantic coresidential unions," however, researchers have pressed forward a belief that people that enter into cohabitation are a select group of highly liberal individuals. Couples enter cohabitation because it is a tentative association that allows them to accommodate their specific values and beliefs into this romantic coresidential union.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that clarkberg, stolzenberg and waite, from the university of chicago, prefer cohabitation over marriage based on their views on procreation and relationships.
- Explains that couples inter into cohabitation because it allows them to postpone their entrance into traditional gender-specific marital roles in a family environment.
- Explains that career and work is a high correlation variable in this study. men who don't believe in steady jobs or are less successful at work are more likely to enter into cohabitation unions.
- Explains that leisure time allotment increased the probability of men entering into cohabitation rather than marriage from 33% to 53%.
- Concludes that both men and women like to be in a union, but many find marriage too restrictive and prefer informal means of being with their loved ones.
390 wordsRead More - There are three reasons that cohabitation before marriage is beneficial; it allows couples to learn one another and as a team forms an identity, decide if marriage is for you, and lowers the divorce rate.
In this essay, the author
- Narrates how they discovered something so erroneous about the person they chose to date and felt they needed to breakup immediately. imagine if they were married and discovered this crudeness.
- Explains that they have been proposed to more than once, and they've been married twice. they did not live with their first partner before marriage.
- Explains that cohabitation before marriage is beneficial for three reasons: it allows couples to learn one another, as a team forms an identity, decide if marriage's for you, and lowers the divorce rate.
- Opines that the more you get to know someone, the better decisions and judgments you can make for yourself and your partner. how a couple handles issues while cohabitating can be the real predictor to successful marriage.
- Explains that as you and your partner grow, they begin to learn the dos and don'ts, and the things that make one another tick.
- Explains that donna batten's gale encyclopedia of american law states that cohabitation has all the difficulties of marriage.
- Explains that one's ideas of cleanliness may not be the same once married, and trying to change that person to your likeness could be difficult.
- Explains that "shacking" with your partner allows you to learn how to balance relationships, finances, and careers together.
- States that marriage underwent sweeping changes in the united states during the twentieth century. from 1960 to 2000, more couples opted to forego marriage altogether, and the number of unmarried couples living together increased by a factor of ten.
- Explains that living together allows couples to align with one another before saying, "i do!"
- Explains that the more you are together your communication skills are growing and this can really make a difference in your decision to marry.
- Opines that learning this now is better than learning it once you are married.
- Opines that if you can live happily with someone even after realizing it won't always be fun, your chances of living happily every after will not seem as difficult.
- Advises couples choosing to cohabitate before marriage to look into their state's law.
- Opines that mississippi is not one of the sixteen states that recognize common law marriage. however, cohabiting couples have little guidance as to their legal rights in such areas as property ownership, responsibility for debts, custody, access to health care and other benefits.
- Explains that common law marriages are those who hold themselves out as being married. they file taxes together, proclaim to the community, even using the same last name.
- Opines that there are many sad stories of couples that live together for many years that later learn after a loved one falls ill or passes away they have no protection.
- Advises that for those living in other states that do not recognize this law, consider this your test run.
- Explains that cohesive-individuated marriages are the yuppie and feminist ideal, characterized by equity, respect, warmth, and mutual support, but also by both partners retaining the autonomy to pursue their own goals.
- Explains that many men and women who decide to live together before marriage typically have their own group of friends and pursued their goals. bringing this together under one roof and the ability to balance your individuality is a good sign that marriage may be for you.
- Narrates how they've split the bills, cleaned together, learned the quirks of each other's personality, and shared their bed.
- Analyzes how lauren fox of the atlantic found that moving in together without a diamond ring didn't lead to divorce. the longer couples waited to make that first serious commitment, the better their marital success.
- Opines that the last thing on their mind now is divorce. they have done the test run and feel confident that this life is for them.
- Analyzes how divorce statistics and couples living together paint an interesting picture. more than half of couples that decided to marry lived together before hand.
- Explains that the divorce rate in couples that decide to "shack up" before marriage has more to do with age at the time they began bunking together.
- Explains that individuals who cohabitated or married at 18 saw a 60 percent divorce rate, whereas those who waited until age 23 saw around 30 percent.
- Explains that at a young age, it is difficult to judge the maturity level of others let alone oneself and deciding if he/she is "the one."
- Explains that there has been a significant increase of 18- to 29-year-olds that are identifying as never married and single. this is based on region, education, and race.
- Explains that young southerners are less likely to be single than their counterparts in other regions, while young whites and hispanics are more likely than young blacks.
- Explains that cohabitation was mistakenly linked to divorce in prior years because poorer people would move in with one another for economic gain, and later slide into marriage due to pregnancy, but their economic issues did not improve.
- Explains that living together prior to the 1960's and not being married was socially unacceptable. however, studies have shown that cohabitating before marriage helps one evaluate if marriage is right for one.
- Believes they would have only married once if they were less traditional the first time around.
1174 wordsRead More - The History of Marriage and Family is Changingopinion essayAlthough throughout the twentieth century the subject of marriage is linked with white wedding dresses and three tiered whipped cream cakes, it has also broached the question of whether or not the committed couple should live together before the big wedding day. While it is less controversial today than, say, fifty years ago, some still call it "living in sin." The primary objections stem from a religious point of view and those who do choose to cohabit before the ink is dry on the marriage license are subject to criticism.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the history of marriage and family has changed from puritanical beliefs that said people had to have a license to live together.
- Explains that marriage has been linked with white wedding dresses and three tiered whipped cream cakes, but it has also broached the question of whether or not the committed couple should live together before the big wedding day.
- Explains that the number of couples living together in canada, without benefit of marriage, almost tripled between 1981 and 1995. the stigma is lessened due to the current people in their twenties having parents who also cohabited before marriage.
- Explains that the divorce rate doubled during the period from 1960 to 1980. studies show that divorce was most common in the second year of marriage.
- Opines that living together may have an effect on an impending marriage, but the obvious effect would be that the couple realizes that they are not right for each other and would not marry at all.
- Explains that the number of children living in families with married couples declined from 88% in 1960 to 69% in 1994. divorce does explain the drop, but may be attributed to the rise in nonmarital childbearing.
- Opines that living together for practical reasons, such as sharing expenses, shouldn't negatively affect the future marriage. however, a religious reservation and personal guilt could put additional strife on the union
- Analyzes the reasons why people move in together, such as less marriage and more out-of-wedlock babies being born in poorer communities.
- Explains smith's suggestion that marriage can increase family wealth. the household division of labor implies that the total product of a married couple is larger than the sum of the outputs of each.
- Opines that marriage is a cause and consequence of economic, cultural, and psychological stratification in american society.
- Opines that long-distance relationships are an issue that needs to be brought up in terms of cohabitation and marriage. some couples choose to stay married but not cohabit.
- Opines that living apart can tear a marriage apart. marriage institutionalizes the obligations of both parents to raise children.
1517 wordsRead More - The Importance Of Marriage In American Cultureanalytical essayAs Stephanie Coontz writes, “through most of human history, marriage united not just two mates but two sets of families” (Coontz 25). American culture provides many freedoms that other cultures do not, such as the freedom to choose a partner. Thus, in American culture an importance is placed on the two individuals in many cases, rather than highlighting the socialization of the two families conjoining as a result. This negligence can be very detrimental in many cases. For example, in the Flats, where marriage is often viewed as threatening to the stability of the kin network, families may not be very supportive. Therefore, without the support of the family the marriage can be compromised in many ways. Carol Stack discusses how it is virtually impossible to break out of poverty, but that the family survives by holding very close and supportive kin networks (Domestic Networks). Therefore, each kin relies one another and because men often “present themselves as economic exploiters to women” marriage is inherently undesired and hated (Women and Men). As a result, families can encourage, start rumors, and gossip, all in an attempt to inhibit the success of he marriage (Women and Men). Therefore it is important to remember that marriage establish[es] and maintain[s] relations between groups, rather than
In this essay, the author
- Explains that divorce rates have spiked to 4.1 marital separations per 1000 individuals in contemporary america. this escalation has left many ambivalent about the future of marriage in the world.
- Explains that anthropologists have found that marriage is culture universal, but it's difficult to define it definitively as it varies worldwide.
- Argues that marriage establishes and maintains relations between groups, rather than just individuals.
- Explains that arranged marriage societies such as the japanese where marriage is a joint commitment and merger agreed upon by both families are ideal because in times of struggle the family can act as support and encourage reconciliation.
- Analyzes how america's marriage culture allows free-mate selection, rested heavily on love, but mates may fail to take into account mate stability.
- Explains that financial stability is analyzed as potential marriages are drafted, and the overall stability of the partner in general is studied.
- Explains that although italy does not practice arranged marriages, central italian culture does have very unique martial practices that promote the couple’s ability to financial establish themselves prior to marriage.
- Explains that ensuring a partner's financial and personal stability prior to marriage can cause divorce rates to be depressed.
- Argues that marriage should not only be based on love but should also be to reap the benefits of marriage such as a medical proxy and some forms of health insurance.
1713 wordsRead More - Cohabitation In A Brave New World Analysisanalytical essayA lot has changed in the past few decades, not to mention centuries. Perhaps you’ve heard your grandparents, or any adult in general, talking about how much the world is changing. In the past few decades, commitment has gone on a rollercoaster. At times it’s going uphill-marriage rates are up, divorce rates are down, and people are happy in their relationships. At other times, it has been quite the opposite. In A Brave New World, they show a glimpse of a possible future society; the novel serves as a warning to help the world slow down when it comes to technology and love. The expression of love has evolved throughout time due to the decrease of chivalry and the increase in divorce rates because of the change of “steps” in a relationship.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how commitment has gone on a rollercoaster in the past few decades. the novel, a brave new world, warns against technology and love.
- Explains that the word "romance" has changed the way it is thought about in the past one hundred years. adults are concerned with technology, social lives, and decision making.
- Explains that in the past thirty years, there have been several changes in trends of american families.
- Explains that divorce rates have been extremely high during the 1960s and 1970s, so there is a goo chance that their children will be divorced at some point.
- Opines that america's view that marriage isn't big can play a key role in the presence of divorce in our society.
- Explains that dating is occurring at much younger ages as generations continue to evolve. the increase in technology along with younger kids dating are just asking for a catastrophe.
- Argues that feminism has caused a decline in chivalry because the two concepts contradict each other.
2189 wordsRead More - Marriage And Cohabitation Essayanalytical essayThroughout the years, societies view on marriage and cohabitation has been changing, especially from the 1950s up until now. Marriage and cohabitation are in relation to social location, education, immigration and social class. In addition, these changes are influenced through socialization and their surrounding environments as people’s beliefs and expectations vary from what a defined family really is. Same-sex couples are now getting married and the divorce rate is on the rise, including non-married couples raising children. Most importantly, each individual determines who they marry or whom they share their love with through conditioning or in the course of shared similarities. People have dissimilar values, beliefs and attitudes and throughout the life course may change again, including the future generations. This paper reviews why marriage is on the decline and cohabitation is now the accepted social norm, including other aspects such as specific rights that couples have over others in the past. Religion is a powerful tool that alters minds of those who are affiliated with it. As a result, their beliefs are conditioned and marriage is valued differently than those who are not married. All in all this paper will further explain the change, continuity and
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how society's view on marriage and cohabitation has changed from the 1950s up until now. they explain the change, continuity, and diversity in marriage.
- Explains the changes in family formation and disruption have transformed in the modern communities. people cohabit, bear children outside marriage, encounter divorce, re-marry, live separate lives with their offspring or remain childless.
- Explains that the nuclear family was the most suitable family structure for industrialized communities, but it is now on the decline across the world societies.
- Explains that personal life courses are progressively heterogeneous, with the form, or greater visibility, of "new" kinds of family structures like large multi-generational households, one parent families, same sex relationships and living-apart-together.
- Explains that according to ciabattari, there are three types of marriage: institutional, companionate and individualized. institutional relation to marriage was based on economic necessity, obligation, and social regulation.
- Explains that the rise in cohabitation is one of the key dynamic in family course that advanced societies seen in the recent years.
795 wordsRead More - In the past fourteen billion years, the world has evolved numerous times. From creatures’ extinctions to the rise of technology, the world is constantly on a path of changes. And, even though not all events have been pleasant experiences, humans have definitely had the chance to learn from those happenings: one example being, marriage and its effects on family development. Since the beginning of time, open relationships between people, one reason being for the purpose of reproduction, have existed. It is simply part of human nature to bond with others; human instinct. History also shows that legal contracts did not tie up the first relationships during the Stone Age. However, due to society, marriage has been represented as the basis of a family, therefore, portraying that a legal contract amongst two heterosexual people is required in order to have the “happily ever after” story. But what happens when problems within a marriage exist, and the people involved are no longer happy? What about those cohabitants who have gone through rough situations and still remain together for many years? So does a legal contract really determine the longevity of a marriage? What is the real definition of marriage? From the start of the Stone Age to current day, humans have witnessed the evolution of marriage, and the benefits of opting for cohabitation. The definition of marriage has gone from being a mandatory arrangement, to being part of the civil right movement, to cohabitation being the best or only alternative to marriage.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the evolution of marriage and its effects on family development from the stone age to the present day.
- Explains that once humanity became civilized, the meaning of intercourse relationships went from being an instinct to a social requirement.
- Explains that marriages were arranged by the parents or guardians of the young couple so that one or more families could gain.
- Explains that most marriages were forced and arranged without the male and female's consent. in some cultures, matrimony meant a monetary exchange, whereas the woman was the husband’s property.
- Analyzes how the idea of the perpetrators having lawful power over their victim is insane, and how marriage took a drastic turn during the civil rights movement.
1352 wordsRead More - Cohabitation Essayexplanatory essayMarriage and cohabitation play a central role in how family life is carried out. The way in which society views marriage and cohabitation is changing as individualism becomes an increasingly mainstream ideal. Marriage rates have decreased significantly on average over the past 60 years, but different groups show different rates of change. While certain sects each have their views, the general trends are showing decreasing marriage rates in lower income individuals, and increasing marriage rates in higher income educated individuals. These rates are directly connected to racial-ethnic groups, leading to larger gaps in socioeconomic status.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that marriage and cohabitation play a central role in how family life is carried out. marriage rates have decreased significantly on average over the past 60 years, but different groups show different rates of change.
- Explains that income often is related to race and ethnicity. the inequality between races continues to grow because wealthy white couples bring in more income, while lower income individuals cannot support a family.
- Explains that cohabitation is a popular alternative to marriage becoming increasingly popular in recent years.
- Explains that couples who cohabitate prior to marriage are more likely to fall carelessly into a marriage or longer relationship. this type of cohabitation is common among lower-class couples.
- Explains that some people choose cohabitation instead of marriage, with no intention of marrying unless an external factor changes. this may be due to ideological opposition or family opposition.
- Explains that divorced or widowed people want companionship or financial stability, but are not looking for the risk or commitment of marriage. women outnumber men due to average age of death.
- Opines that they are ideologically opposed to the concept of marriage. they feel that relying heavily on one individual for these things is unrealistic.
- Opines that even cohabitation is a major commitment. they feel the need to have individual space, and would have hard time committing to sharing an apartment, or sharing certain financial burdens.
- Opines that too much time spent with any one person will lead to suffocation of certain traits which make an individual.
- Opines that as a privileged white individual who plans to be well-educated and wealthy, they believe their value will be high on the marriage market.
1058 wordsRead More - I Wish They D Do It Right Analysisanalytical essayIn her essay “I Wish They’d Do It Right”, Jane Doe highlights her ideology that marriage is honorable and legitimate, yet cohabitation is unacceptable and “socially awkward” (222). Doe illustrates her disagreement with her son’s decision of living in cohabitation, and tries to persuade him into marriage based on what the whole family will say or on society’s judgment. Doe argues that a marriage will create economical benefits between her son and his “girlfriend”, and provide a sense of stability for her soon-to-be grandson. However, it is noticeable that Doe’s views on marriage are based on her family and societies negative judgment on cohabitation, and the social acceptance of a traditional marriage. Based on my parents’ divorce, I disagree with Doe’s argument that marriage is always beneficial, real, and can guarantee a “happily ever after” (223); however, cohabitation can be as sincere, genuine, and exclusive as a marriage. I believe marriage should be based on the couple’s feelings and their readiness on taking the next step, instead of it being based on family and society’s opinion.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes jane doe's essay, "i wish they'd do it right", which highlights her ideology that marriage is honorable and legitimate, yet cohabitation is unacceptable and "socially awkward."
- Analyzes how doe asserts that her son has lived in cohabitation for seven years without the "benefit of license," which has deprived him and his girlfriend from economic benefits.
- Analyzes how doe portrays the negative effect her son and his “girlfriend” will have on her soon-to-be grandson due to not being legitimate.
- Opines that doe is wrong when she states that children with divorced parents "will not suffer greater damage".
- Analyzes linda j. waite's essay "the negative effects of cohabitation" to confirm doe’s argument that cohabitation is often a mistake committed by many couples.
- Explains that one of their cousins married because she believed it would make her relationship exclusive, but her desire to live in monogamy was not granted. their brother lives in cohabitation with his significant other.
- Opines that marriage is not for everyone in their family, which leads to heartbreaking breakups and divorces. they would marry their significant other even if he were not wealthy or did not benefit them financially.
- Explains that cohabitation offers the advantage of getting to know a person and understanding one another without being married. married love should be honored and not used for oneself.
1223 wordsRead More - Analysis Of Nasty Endings To A Divorcecomparative essayTwo may think that they’re right for each other, but after a while true colors start to show, making one regret his or her decision. A marriage is no walk in the park and today people tend to think that they are ready for marriage, when in fact they’re not. A marriage is a big step and commitment, it requires all habits to be discontinued like for example staying out all night with friends. Without a foundation the marriage will most likely fall apart, and then couples have to deal with the whole divorce process. If couples would sit back and evaluate each other and ask themselves if it’s really worth it they could save themselves and their potential others. A marriage is a beautiful thing, and if treated as such it can lead to positive things such as financial gains, children, and much more. If treated carelessly it could lead to lies, infidelity and financial
In this essay, the author
- Explains that divorce is something that could end peacefully or it could go south and end badly. many couples get married so quickly without really knowing each other.
- Explains that marriage vows don't mean as much as people think they mean, but as time progresses, there could become small lies about things like what was eaten for lunch or dinner.
- Explains that infidelity is one of the biggest problems in a marriage, and if not stopped in time it will rip the marriage apart.
- Explains that financial issues are another problem in a relationship that also leads to divorce. men tend to think that they have to be the "breadwinners" of the house because it makes them feel dominant.
- Concludes that divorce is the worst downfall of a marriage. it requires all habits to be discontinued, and couples have to deal with the whole divorce process.
848 wordsRead More