As Allison Booth explains, “If behaving competitively is viewed as being a part of male gender identity but not of a female, then being in a coeducational school environment might lead girls to make less competitive choices than boys” (544). Girls may choose to refrain from participating in class or activities if they are intimidated and afraid in a co-educational setting. Many a time, it is mistaken that boys are more competitive since they are seen as more dominant in society. However, competitiveness between girls in a single-sex school is just as equal to that of boys. In addition to this competitiveness, boys and girls will have the possibility of gaining more confidence if taught in separate environments.
The students are being distracted by the other gender, due to examples such as, sexual harassment and the inappropriate appearance and dress code of students. Single-gender schools can help teachers to gear their instruction to a specific gender, rather than generalizing it to please both genders. While co-educational schools can assist students to be interactive with the other gender, single-gender schools can be more beneficial towards a students’ education. Many people don’t know that single-sex schools actually originated before co-educational schools. Usually it was only the boys who went to school, while the girls stayed home and worked.
INTRODUCTION Many parents and educators are led to believe that single-sex education can eliminate the distractions for students in the classroom. There is evidence that suggests that there are significant gains for children who attend single-sex schools, especially girls, and that these schools encourage the students to flourish. However, there is an ongoing debate about the impact that single-sex schools have on both the academic achievement and social skills, and there are studies that suggest with an increase in gender stereotyping comes problematic behaviors. (Van Thompson, Demand Media) Coeducation is seen as improving educational efficiency (Woody, 1929) and encouraging a positive social relationship between boys and girls. However, some studies, such as that by Coleman (1961), indicated that coeducation had a negative effect on girls’ academic achievement due to the peer pressure to prioritise relations with the opposite sex rather than schoolwork.
On the other hand, some people believe that not having males in the learning environment can be an issue. Having an all girls school can create a falsely safe environment for the students and have them be ill-prepared for the real world. When the girls get out of school and into the work environment where they have to be around the opposite sex, they may not know how to react in that situation. Girls may also not know what to deem appropriate behavior from boys and what is out of the normal, or creepy, and what kind of boys to stay away
In 1993, American University professors Myra Sadker and David Sadker published their research in Failing in Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Girls, which pointed out key differences of how teachers treated students in the classroom. These included the teachers praising the boys over the girls, giving more attention to the male gender than female. So by separating the genders, there is less discrimination, and more focus on teaching single sex students. Without boys in their classes, girls are more likely to be leaders and reach higher levels of achievement, which leads to greater self-confidence and higher professional aspirations. And without girls in the classroom, boys are less distracted from the academic works, and make higher grades in the single sex environment.
How does gender segregation effect students in school? Many countries believe that separating genders in schools helps to make a better atmosphere and better academically. There are many advantages have been shown for single-sex schooling. It has been shown that the differences of the performance in school subjects can differ from boys to girls, many supporters believe that gender segregation in education helps increase the academic interests. Teachers have been attending training to learn how to teach girls and boy.
When it comes to females in a single sex school their learning experiences and outcomes may be different of that from males. There are many statistics suggesting that all boy or girl schools are more beneficial to the students, as opposed to a tradition co-ed school. But many other statics may say otherwise. One reason people might say all male or female schools are better is because there is no distraction from the opposite sex, or no pressure of maintaining an expectable appearance or look to the male/female eye and because this is one less big distraction the student will be more focused then they would be at an integrated school. A disadvantage is that in the future of the student’s life when they have to go into the real world, they may be at a lost as to how to socially interact with the opposite sex.
should students be in single-sex schools or mixed schools? Some people see that mixed schools are better for students and they are 100% for it.In addition some people see that it helps to build the students' charcter and personality in a good and confident way.Others have a different opinion and they see that it's better for students to be in single-sex schools because they believe it makes them independent .Students should me in single-sex school because it affects academic achievement , students of the opposite sex can be a distraction and girls and boys develop at different times and speeds. Firstly,some people think that girls are not any better in single-sex school and do not have any academic achievement and see that mixed schools helps students to cooperate in order to increase academic achievement.However,girls benefit from single-sex education.Some researches were done and they found that girls participate more in class and get higher scoresin tests and theyalso discovered that girls in single-gender classes were considerably extra probable to accomplish a higher level of intellectual accomplishment at period 16 than girls in coed classes. Though, there was no momentous difference in afterward educational attainment for either sex. Women who had attended single-gender schools were extra probable to gain their highest attainment at period 33 in a male-dominated earth contrasted to co-educated women.Girls in single-sex schools are more positive about their own abilities and academic achievement .they have control over their life, less stereotyped gender role attitudes and hold higher aspirations for the future (Bryk,1993).
Therefore, creates two different environments of education. In other words, single gender schools have teaching methods which can be applied more successfully on that gender only and therefore improves the quality of education for both genders. According to ( Kirshenbaum, 2007), girls seem to prefer learning in quieter place in which they work and learn together, while boys tend to learn or prefer to learn in a place which is more competitive, louder and physically active. It shows that girls gets a higher benefit from being together especially for Mathematics and Science. They feel much more comfortable about their abilities without worrying about how they look in front of boys and have more confidence to take place and participate in class discussions, while boys have much more confidence to dominate most class discussion, thus giving no chance for girls to participate in those discussions.
It seems that single-sex education perpetuates gender stereotypes and promotes gender bias among students (Taylor). Gender-separate education requires schools and teachers to create gender-oriented courses, facilities, and learning environment. As a result, sing-sex schools exacerbate sexist attitudes and “feelings of superiority toward women” (Guarisco). It is fair to argue that the best way to achieve gender equality is to promote rather than eliminate interaction among girls and boys. However, girls in the sex-mixed class receive less attention from teachers than boys, which may lead to gender bias.