The Importance Of Acting

1368 Words3 Pages

Being an actor is much more than just going out onstage and pretending to be someone else to please people. Acting isn’t a simple process, there are many elements that tie into being a quality actor; for example, the way the actor goes about preparing for a scene, how they prepare for a rehearsal and performance and how they regard the script, play, director, and designers. All of these things go into how you measure the success of an actor because being a successful actor just doesn’t mean you’re able to memorize and recite lines, it’s about going beyond that and actually acting out and finding what the lines truly mean.
There’s no right or wrong way to acting; the only thing that differentiates you and the other person is how believable …show more content…

Your director will always be the most important person when acting because they’re the one who will be watching you and critiquing what you do on how you act and what you do. You should always show respect for your director because they’re the ones who are gave you the chance to act in the first play. Their job is to make sure you’re doing what you’re supposed to be and constantly telling you what you can do to improve your acting. Designers are vital people for many reasons. For one, they’re the ones who actually come up with ideas for how things will work and actually do them. Their job is never over because things can constantly be improved and can be changed.A man named Adolphe Appia once stated “at present, theatrical technique is about one thing only: scenic illusion. With very rare exceptions, everything is sacrificed to the pursuit of this illusion” (Appia).This quotes mean that everything must be sacrificed to create the illusion of theatre by making the technical aspects and set phenomenal; which is part of the designers job since they’re the ones who are in charge of things that make the show pretty. Both directors and designers are people you need in theatre because they’re the ones who make the show what it …show more content…

If the actor has succeeded in tricking the audience into believing they’re who they claim to be then I believe they’ve done their job; no matter how poorly or amazing they did. If the audience truly believed they were someone else based on how they portrayed their character, then they did what they were supposed to do. Although this plays a large aspect into determining whether or not the success of an actor, it isn’t the only thing that goes into it. There are many things that go into determining if an actor is successful or not and one of those is how hard they worked during the rehearsal practise. If they gave their all and went above and beyond, then they certainly succeeded at what they were supposed to do. The success of a performance isn’t based off of how big the audience is, you could have thousands of people watching a play and it could be one of the worst plays they’ve seen. The success of it is how the audience enjoyed it and if they truly believe the actors to be who they said they were. If they’re gave great reactions to what was happening in a scene, then the show was a success because that means the actors hit their objective by providing the audience with an outstanding

Open Document