Battered Women’s Syndrome Plea and a Defendants Financial Dependence: Evaluating Legal Decisions

1386 Words3 Pages

When battered woman’s syndrome has been used as a plea of self-defense, especially in cases of homicide, it has highly been scrutinized. According to recent research, characteristics associated with the syndrome form a standard that jurors use to judge battered women. This study would evaluate how characteristics of a defendant would affect a juror’s legal decision-making, in a case of a woman pleading not guilty under terms of self-defense, who were suffering from battered woman’s syndrome. To discuss the role of the battered women’s syndrome in relation to how characteristics of a victim affect legal decision-making it is important to define what battered women’s syndrome is. Battered women’s syndrome is the array of physical and psychological injuries exhibited by women who have been beaten repeatedly or otherwise abused by their partners or spouses (Dutton & Painter, 1993). More specifically women feel helpless or a lack of control and do not leave their abusive partner. According to Russell, Ragatz, and Kraus (2012) Lenore Walker (1984) theorized that battered women experience a three-phase cycle of abuse through learned helplessness: 1) the tension building up to the abuse, 2) acute battering and abuse escalation, and 3) remorse for the violence exhibited by the abuser toward the victim. She argued that battered women believe that the abuse they withstand was their fault, and as a result, stay in the relationship. Learned helplessness can be applied to help explain why a woman would stay in an abusive relationship, or explain a woman’s sense of “psychological paralysis” (Schuller & Rzepa, 2002). This is because of the repetitive and unpredictable nature of the violence, woman are reduced to a state of continual fear, leav... ... middle of paper ... ...f the battered person syndrome, defendant gender, and sexual orientation in a case of duress: evaluating legal decision. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 659-670 Russell, B. L., & Melillo, L. S. (2006). Attitudes toward battered women who kill: defendant typicality and judgments of culpability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 219-241 Schuller, R. A., Wells, E., Rzepa, S., & Klippenstine, M. A. (2004). Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: the impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors’ decision. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 36, 127-136. Schuller, R. A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 655-673. Schuller, R. A., & Vidmar, N. (1992). Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 273-291.

More about Battered Women’s Syndrome Plea and a Defendants Financial Dependence: Evaluating Legal Decisions

Open Document