Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of censorship on society
Negative effects of censorship on society
Negative effects of censorship on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of censorship on society
Why Books should not be banned “A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies; the man who never reads lives only one.” It is long been said that books are the assets that can take a nation from the earth to moon and can rebuild the destiny of the nation. Books are public wealth and should not be banned to any of the persons that can read and want to read that. Books are amazing things, full of adventures, romance, and discoveries! Books can bring us to amazing places like Narnia, Germany, and even another person’s mind. Many famous stories like "Harry Potter", "Divergent", and “The Hunger Games” inspire us to be brave, to dream, and to use our imaginations. I think that books should never be banned in the United States or anywhere else. So, one could think why some books are banned for people and how that can impact the scenario. A few reasons countries ban some books are because they feel they are violent, negative, or have racial issues. There are many more reasons that books are banned, like sexual situations or dialogue, the story is age inappropriate, the presence of witchcraft, encouragement of "damaging" lifestyles, blasphemous dialogue, religious affiliations, or political bias. But I think there are ways we can make it so we don't have to …show more content…
If Romeo and Juliet or the Bible didn’t exist, the world wouldn't be the same. I would hate it if my favorite book series had never existed! Books give us something to do on a long car ride, at a boring family thing, or just in general. So now any thoughts you ever had on banning books should have disintegrated! Books are fun, inspirational, and amazing. The meaning of a book is different for everyone, if you don’t like reading a book is just a stack of papers with a cover, if you love reading then a book to you is full of adventure, excitement, and fun. Books can change a life, so please don't take that away from
The government believes it is much easier to control a society full of dumb people, so they put up an law to restrict books from the public. “We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the constitution says, but everyone made equal... A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man’s mind”. Books are dangerous, not because they physically are, but because of the knowledge they contain can bring about any opponent. Ideas and knowledge makes people question how things are, and allows them to see all the problems within this corrupted
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
Censorship is a concept with several different meanings. To each individual censorship has its own meaning. Is it a violation of our rights or is it a protection for our well being? Censorship in the generic sense refers to the suppression of information, ideas, or opinions. It occurs in all forms of communication from technological media to print media. Each society, culture, or individual's belief is violated by the codes of censorship that our society instills.
School boards and teachers have a responsibility for protecting the minds of their students and covering age appropriate material. However, does this responsibility cover the extreme act of banning books from school classrooms? Does not the teacher have a duty to introduce to their students world issues in order to better the students ability to cope with problems in the world? How does a school decide which books should be banned from the classroom, and should it be left up to the teacher to decide what is decided in his/her classroom. By banning books from the classroom, we prevent our students from learning about controversial topics in a safe environment, and we also encroach upon the student’s freedom of reading what they want in school.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
Books that have shaped America are slowly starting to disappear. Many of the previous social norms have fallen out of fashion, and because of this reason numerous books are beginning to become banned. Blasphemy, racism, sex, and violence are all ethical reasons for books to be censored.
Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe. The Houston Chronicle, pp.C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
Book banning has been around ever since there have been books to ban. It happens all throughout history whenever a brave writer or philosopher has enough courage to share what they think is right, or too explicit the truth. Where would the world be without mind changing literary classics such as Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Huckleberry Finn, or The Catcher in the Rye? If everyone were to read only what was allowed and censored then everyone would only think what was allowed and censored, and the world would never be challenged or improved. If you never let someone see differently then how are they ever expected to think anything new? An easy access to different learning material is vital. Books should not be taken out of libraries and stores because some people do not agree with their controversial material.
Although when books are banned, there is no loud reaction in public as compared to other sources of mass communication because people think that how many readers will be there? But there is historic importance of books that no one can deny.