Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About Bangladesh culture and history
Partition of India / Pakistan in paragraph writing about 600 words
Bangladesh and muslim world relation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About Bangladesh culture and history
Of all the countries that have won their sovereignty in the past 50 years, few are as sprawling of a state as Bangladesh. Bangladesh has established itself as an enormous population center and a mighty, economic powerhouse. Yet it simultaneously faces immense problems that seem to permanently position it as a third-world nation. Bangladesh's European-influenced government, robust economy, and cultural icons have created one of the most prominent countries in Asia.
Bangladesh is host to a long line of tumultous history, one of violence and ethnic strife. On August 15, 1947, after much relcutance and violent persuasion by militiary means, the British Empire agreed to enact the Partition of India and split South Asia into two autonoumous states, India and Pakistan. The ethnic reasons for division were motivated by religious differences between Hindu India and Islamic Pakistan. But Pakistan was not the nation-state that it appeared to be, and a long history of differing Bengali culture eventually resulted in the creation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh in 1971. (Bangladesh)
Even after achieving its nation of cultural homogenity, Bangladesh still faced several problems. A Constitution was enacted in 1972, but deferred after a coup in 1982. It finally was restored on November 10, 1986. The Constitution had established a parliamentary democracy, where every five years people voted for the unicameral parliament, called the Jatiyo Sangshad. (Bangladesh) The new system of government directly stemmed from Bangladesh's experience as a British colony. The Prime Minister serves as a head of government while the president is the head of state, albeit a more ceremonial position akin to Britain's Que...
... middle of paper ...
...ependence, the struggle for stability will only be a stepping stone in the country's promising future.
Works Cited
"Bangladesh Government." CountryReports. CountryReports, 2014. Web. 18 May 2014. "Economy: Bangladesh." CIA World Factbook. CIA, n.d. Web. 18 May 2014.
"Famous People from Bangladesh." Famous Birthdays. SheKnows Entertainment, 2014. Web. 18 May 2014.
"Famous Singers from Bangladesh." Ranker. N.p., 2014. Web. 18 May 2014.
Islam, Serajul. "Women's Rights and Discrimination in Bangladesh." Dhaka Tribune. Portonics, July 2013. Web. 18 May 2014.
Lewis, David. Bangladesh: Politics, Economy, and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. Print.
Liberto, Jennifer. "US Curbs Bangladesh Trade Privileges." CNNMoney. CNN, 2013. Web. 18 May 2014.
"Top 5 Corporate Groups of Bangladesh." Bangladesh's Corporate World. N.p., 2012. Web. 18 May 2014.
The relationship between cricket and politics is clearly delineated in South Asia from 1880 to 2005 through the easing of the stress between totally different caste members, although the stress mitigated wasn't forever from a religious aspect between the Pakistanis, Indians, and also the British. The various issues that arose in South Asia was largely class or caste systems (Docs 2, 3, 4), rivalry (Docs 1, 6, 10), and religious tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the various countries and cricket groups. Throughout its interaction with Indian politics from 1880 to 2005, cricket has served as both a unifying force between totally different political groups and also has divided political groups in periods of power struggle and political variations, as well as making sturdy bonds between countries.
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
We held our first seminar on the "Prospect of Software Development Business in Bangladesh and the Government's Role, " and five months later we had our second seminar on the "Obstacles for Young Entrepreneurs in Bangladesh' with the finance minister as the chief guest.
The government and politics of Nicaragua is also very important. The government is a republic with three different branches. The executive is elected for a six year term. The largest party is the Sandinista National Liberation Front. The judicial system consists of the Supreme Court, which handles both civil and criminal
Despite their independence, Bangladesh continued to be fragmented with many political groups vying for power to overthrow the self-appointed leadership, President H.M. Ershad. Many of the parties sought to influence their people by employing “so-called opposition newspapers, which promote their political positions” (Lane, Distaefano, & Maznevski, 2006 p.144). This cooperation often resulted in strikes and demonstrations from student groups, unions, and supporters from the opposition.
The United Kingdom is formally called “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.” Government in the United Kingdom is considered to be Parliamentary. Although it is parliamentary, it is also described as being “majoritarian.” Parliament in the UK works a little different than the United States; the people of the U.S. are allowed to elect their president. In the parliamentary system the people elect who will be in the legislature, and the legislature then selects who the next prime minister will be. Then, once the prime minister is selected he choses members of the cabinet. This system creates a quick and easy political decision-making by popular majority. In this essay we will discuss the strengths and limitations the majoritarian government of the UK. One of the strengths of majoritarian government is perhaps that it is the fastest to pass or veto legislation, however there are limitations or weaknesses also like it lacks checks and balances from the House of Lords, and the disadvantage that the smaller parties have when it comes to elections, and not having a set calendar date for elections.
Every country differs in their preference of political system to govern their countries. For democratic countries, two possible choices of governing are the presidential system and the parliamentary system. Since both the presidential and the parliamentary systems have their own strengths and weaknesses, many scholars have examined these two forms of government, and debate on which political system is more successful in governance. In this paper, I will first provide a detailed analysis of both the parliamentary and the presidential system. I will also evaluate each system’s strengths and weaknesses, addressing any differences as well as any commonalities. Finally, I will conclude by using historical examples to analyze and support the presidential system, which would be a more desirable system for a democratic government.
The most threatening conflict between Hindus and Muslims is the province of Kashmir. This is where the decision to divide India into India and Pakistan seems to have been a terrible mistake. Kashmir, which is the only Muslim majority city in India, lies between the divided India and Pakistan. After India’s independence in the 1940’s, Kashmir had to choose to either unite with India or Pakistan. The Prince of Kashmir chose India but Pakistan invaded the province soon after and have occupied part of Kashmir since then. Controversy still surrounds the province today because naturally, Muslims want to control it. While many Muslims relocated to Pakistan and the Hindus to India, half of the Muslim population was left in India and their relations did not improve after being partially separated.
During the Cold War, many regional conflicts occurred and were noted as the significant battles which later led to decolonization. One of the regional conflicts were India and Pakistan fighting for their independence. In 1947, India was released under Great Britain’s control and gained its independence. However, the country was divided between Muslims and Hindus, which share different religions. Muslims wanted church and state to become unified while Hindus wanted a separation of these two establishments. Since these two ethnic groups disagreed, it was difficult to create a new government. Therefore, India was divided into two nations: India for the Hindus and Pakistan for the Muslims. Hindus and Muslims were racing to the border in order to get to their nation state which led to killing 500,000 people due to rioting. Although, Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian National Congressman, wanted to obtain peace between these two religions. Pakistan refused the H...
First is labour costs are low, even lower than in China. Obviously low hourly wages rates explain it but not only. Investments by textile manufacturers in productivity-boosting technology lowered the labour costs in Bangladesh making it one of the world’s low-cost producers. Indeed, this was an advantage during the Recession because big importers increased their purchases at low prices. Second is strong network of supporting industries. Thus, garments Manufacturers save transport and storage costs, import duties which boost their productivity.
Firstly there is the presidential system. There are many characteristics to a presidential system. The first main part of a presidential system is how the executive is elected. The executive is a president who is elected to a fixed term. Also a president is not only head of state, but is head of government. The president is the sole executive of the government. Even though there is a cabinet in a presidential system it does not have the power it does in a parliamentary system. The cabinet is chosen by the president instead of chosen by the parliament. A president has to follow a constitution rather than following history. The president actually has a large part in the government’s decisions. A big advantage to political scientists of the presidential system is that there is a separation of powers. The legislative branch being separate from the executive branch lets one another keep checks and balances on each other. This assures that no one branch will take over or attempt to take over the government. Another advantage of a presidential system is that the population elects the chief executive and the legislative branch. By winning a popular vote shows that most of a country is backing the executive which does not seem to cause revolution. The president can not dissolve an assembly as one can in a parliamentary system. Also in a presidential system there is the judicial branch, which is the court system. The judicial branch is important because it helps uphold the constitution. One of the last advantages of a presidential system is that there is more stability because a president is elected to a fixed term, where as in a parliamentary system a prime minister can be ousted at any time. A presidential system is not perfect, but it has it’s high and low points.
Introduction In late 1947, the newly created states of India and Pakistan went to war over the valley of Kashmir. A United Nations brokered ceasefire divided the state into Indian and Pakistani controlled territories, and resolved that a referendum would be held in which the people of Kashmir would be able to choose to join either country. The referendum has not been held to date. India granted its portion of Kashmir a special status within its constitution, allowing for a great degree of self-autonomy.
...m having an authoritarian leader even if he is trying to help the country grow. Also, the authors don’t believe in foreign aid and they explain that usually only 10% actually reaches the helpless. However, even if only 1% of the intended aid was going to the actual recipients, than that would still be an accomplishment over nothing.
The shift to a free trade regime in the textile industry was good for Bangladesh. Bangladesh prospered when other economies were not t doing so well. The textile industry greatly increased causing it to become a major reason as to why the economic has continued to increase. Increasingly bring in billions and billions from exports between 2006 to 2012 like the book mentions.
Parnini, S.N, Othman, M.R, Ghazali, A.S. (2013) 'The Rohingya Refugee Crisis and Bangladesh-Myanmar Relations. ', Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, vol. 22, p. 134.