More handpicked essays just for you.
Social cognitive learning theory essay
Learning theories paper social cognitive theory
Learning theories paper social cognitive theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bandura & Rotter, Molly Ringwald Character from Breakfast Club
The reinforcement for Clair’s behavior was mainly dependent on the approval she received from her popular peer group. She has a notion that she needs to be “popular” or approved in order to be seen as better in her school. Reinforcement would also be abiding by her parents so she is able to shop with her families wealth. After she had bought something materialistic, it makes her feel good. There was a battle of the reinforcement values in this movie. One was, as stated above, to seek approval of her older known peers known to be stuck-up, condescending, and popular. The other is reinforcement of a more positive virtue. This virtue is as stated, thinking independently and making choices in one’s life for oneself instead of seeking approval from her snobbish peer group. This would help he correct her choices of behavior so they do not become repetitive. At the beginning of the film Clair wasn’t to open to the later reinforcement but then discovered it via introspection through group discussion. They discussed peer groups, virginity, suicide attempts, and assaults. Although many of the ways they talked about each other had been derogatory in some way. Clair still introspected.
When Clair was confronted about negative evaluations and opinions about herself, she became upset. Her expectancies had been almost the same throughout the movie until her introspection. She would either get upset, denial, switches the blame to person discussing the problem, or rationalized her behavior. An example of rationalizing would be her assuming that Andrew would say “Hi.” To Brain in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his sporty peers. This means possibility of being categorized as a defensive external. If Clair is a defensive external, then the Social Cognitive Learning Theory would be in hot water. This is because the theory states that people who indicate that they are controlled by the outside are not suppose to be competitive. This is a hypocritical theory in comparison to the external locus of control.
Clair needs to be approved by groups immediately or she feels left out. Therefore, her expectancy in this situation is to be approved by others. This would also be known as social desirability. Clair also jumps in on bashing another person verbally when her peer does it. Thus, her exp...
... middle of paper ...
...ce and a very new love in John Bender.
The Defensive behaviors would line up with Rotter’s defensive external definition associated with Clair’s expectancies. The idea of social comparison had been used by Clair and the new group during their circle discussion. They compared each other socially via peer groups and attitudes. Clair did use dehumanization as a tactic in conversation as well. Clair proclaimed herself better then the others solely because of her group and monetary status while calling Brian an academic nerd and John a criminalistic drug burner. The “burner” remark was a little hypocritical after she had smoked it herself. She used the advantageous comparison method to explain how each of them would treat each other on the Monday after the detention they would be back in school. She discussed how she would do the same thing to Allison as Andrew would hypothetically do to Brian. Use this as an example: (Andrew [Clair] would say “Hi.” To Brain [Allison] in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his sporty peers [stuck-up popular girls].) Lastly, Clair was using displacement, blaming her condescending peer group and parents for her condescending behavior.
Her addiction to cocaine has been revealed. The use of drugs is a common issue in today’s modern movies, and that is one of the reasons Cruel Intentions is different in terms of its cultural context. Cecile and Annette (Tourvel) worked together to produce copies of Sebastian’s journal, which revealed Catherine’s true self, and they handed them out to the student body and faculty.... ... middle of paper ...
...usion the museum should be business owned when it comes to maintaining it and not government owned. The Museum of Science and Industry impacted Chicago’s culture tremendously. If it wasn’t for Julius Rosenwald becoming inspired by the museum in Munich, to being determined for building a museum in Chicago, and acquiring a bond or an endowment. If it was government owned the museum would be depending on funding and when there isn’t enough funding then the museum will be forced out of business. There could be a government shutdown and the museum would be shut down temporarily and visitors would be furious. As a result next time you visit the Museum of Science and Industry actually think for a moment and thank everyone from the staff and administration, who cause the museum to become successful. Also don’t say “UGH! This is so boring”. You can say “Wow! That is so cool”
The theory explains how people could be labeled a certain way which would follow them and encourage them to act within the confines of said label or be unable to be perceived as anything but that label. These apparent role models participated in deviant behavior almost equal to that of the Roughnecks and yet they went on to be remembered as good kids. They were allowed to act like delinquents but were never perceived as such because they maintained appearances (good grades, healthy interactions, and lots of participation). The Roughnecks on the other hand took no steps to help with their reputation (they skipped school, made their actions public and attracted a lot of negative attention) thus insuring their label. Regardless of each student’s involvement with certain activities they obtained their labels and kept them through
In The absolutely true diary of a part time Indian by Sherman Alexie, Junior often speaks his mind through his drawings. Junior’s emotions are often portrayed in either cartoon or realistic drawing. Some say that one’s emotions can often be depicted from the art that he/she creates. In Sherman Alexie’s novel, Junior often draws things in cartoons, such as his best friend beating someone up or a basketball dunk, while on few occasions he draws things in a realistic fashion such as his father looking cool on his motorcycle. On every occasion in which Junior has drawn himself he has depicted himself in the cartoon. Many people have argued that it could be that he looks down upon himself due to his mental and physical disabilities. I think junior
This review questions Maurice Berger´s assertion that “white [museum] curators, administrators, and patrons” seldom accept art outside the “mainstream” or art that “challenges dominant values.” Paradoxically, this quote supports the point of an article—Lisa C. Corrin´s “Mining the Museum”—rich in examples of exhibitions, curated by white artists and curators, and aimed at overcoming standard practices.
Museums rely on items to build their collections but not all the items that are housed on their shelves unarguable belong to the museum its self. In the museum culture, there is a conflict between the museum and descendant communities over the rightful owners of cultural collections.
One of these is normative social influences, this is “the influence others have on us because we want them to like us (King, 2013, p. 447). Andrew shows this when he talks about how he got in detention. Andrew states he bullied a kid, so the kid would think he was cool. You see that Andrew does this disgusting action to this kid so he could be seen as cool. Another social behavior that is seen in the film is the fundamental attribution error, which is observers overestimate the importance of the internal traits and underestimate the importance of external factors when explaining others behaviors. We see the fundamental attribution error a lot in this movie. First we see it with Brian, everyone sees him as smart. But when Brian explains that he failed shop class people were surprised; they never thought this kid would ever fail, since he is so smart. Another is with Bender, they see him as disrespectful and aggressive. What they do not know is, at home, he is being verbally and physically abused by his dad and has to defend himself. This can bring us to conformity, which is a change in a person’s behavior to get more closely with group standards. We see this with all five of the students. Let’s start with Andrew, he covers up his hatred for him father so he wouldn’t be seen as abnormal. Then you have Brian who talks about contemplating suicide for failing a class. He did not want to
One of the major conflicts is the intrapersonal conflict Cady has with herself. Cady goes from being home-schooled in Africa to entering the “girl-world” in high school. Throughout the movie, Cady is trying to fit in, become popular and to get the attention of her crush, Aaron Samuels. This causes Cady to ultimately lose herself in the process of becoming Plastic. In the effort to take revenge on Regina for taking Aaron back, Cady loses her own self by attempting to be Regina. This gets Janis to notice Cady’s transformation especially when Cady throws party the same night of Janis’s art show and doesn’t even show up to the art show. Janis came to Cady’s house tell her: “You think that everyone is in love with you, when actually, everyone hates you.” Cady then has to decide whether she wants to become a better person or become someone she’s
The cost of the artifact must be balanced with the market value to benefit the business. “The reoccurring operating deficit approached $1 million a year and was worsening.” (source A). Losing money is never good for a business, but with a constant influx of money from customers, exhibits can be expanded for the public to view. The price of an artifact should be cheap so the museum cannot lose from it, but expensive to bring the public to spend money seeing it. “…exhibitions and acquisitions were often approved without regard for overall policy guidelines or the museum’s fragile financial condition…” (source A). Without proper leadership, policies can be broken and artifacts that are worthless will waste money. The curator who buys new artifacts
Laurie is creative. Laurie is able to think of ideas on the spot when he lies about the true identity of Charles. He says that Charles is bigger than him and that “he doesn’t have any rubbers and he doesn’t wear a jacket” (2). The little details that he can easily provide show much creativity. When he imagines Charles, he is acting like a painter with a blank canvas, he could have painted a few simple black lines but instead, he paints or imagines a canvas with lots of squiggles and colours. On top of that, Laurie can think of a lot of different ways to make trouble. He does not learn how to make trouble from anybody else because he is new to school which does not give him time to pick up this kind of behaviour from someone else. His teacher does not mention that he was influenced by anybody. He gets in trouble on the first day of scho...
Laurie did not obtain enough attention, in a result, she misbehaved for attention. Laurie was trying to be cool and get attention so he misbehaved at school on the first day. He went home, then told his parents that Charles was bad that day and he was
When encountered with a chance to feel accepted, people will take it no matter the consequences to others. For example, in "And Summer is Gone", Amy is excluding David to become more popular, causing him to feel as if he's responsible for her change in personality. To explain further, Amy sees an opportunity to become accepted however, she can't continue being friends with David. This point can also be found in "Adjö means Goodbye". Marget stops speaking with the narrator after her birthday because she thinks the narrator's responsible for nobody showing up. To clarify, Marget decides that to have more friends, she needs to stop being friends with the narrator. As a desperate act to feel accepted, people will go as far as to even change their appearance and personality.
All across the world there are hundreds of museums filled with history, information, exhibits, and famous documents. A variety of museums display artifacts of a mix of several cultures, historical events, famous people, and art work in the entire museum. Rather than having several different attractions, some museums are dedicated to showcasing exhibits based on a specific topic of history or interest. Therefore, museums with the purpose of educating people of a certain topic should only display artifacts, pictures, documents, and other such attractions germane to the museum’s theme of interest. In order for a museum to achieve it’s purpose and maintain it’s protocol, the museum must take into consideration the many pros and cons of a new display throughout the decision process.
“Fitting in” is a concept that is seen a lot in adolescence. Teenagers will do pretty much anything at times to have friends or appear to be “cool.” That is exactly what happens to Tracy in this film. As the film begins, Tracy is a good, simple girl, and her pureness all changes when she befriends the most popular girl in school, Evie Zamora. Evie is very rebellious. She does not have a strong authority figure in her life (Levy-Hinte, London, & Hardwicke, 2003). The sweet, innocent young Tracy is soon to be completely transformed. Evie is vividly a bad influence on Tracy from the beginning, as seen when she influences Tracy to steal something the first time they hang out together (Levy-Hinte, et al., 2003). Stealing is illegal and considered a minor crime and turns Tracy into a delinquent (Berk, 2011). Tracy’s identity development is heavily influenced by her new friendship with Evie from that moment on. Evie is so popular, but she makes very poor choices and Tracy follows her lead because she wants ...
In the film The Breakfast Club there are various social psychological theories and concepts that describe the inner selves of the characters. The characters in the film are initially perceived in a certain manner by each other because of knowing the way they behave in school and the type of people and environment they surround themselves with in school. However one detention on a Saturday brings these characters together and throughout the film their true personalities and behaviors start to reveal themselves by means of social psychological theories and concepts. The characters individually and as a group display their personalities through theories and concepts of social psychology. At the very start of the film, one of the concepts displayed is the acceptance type of conformity. The principal assigns the characters (students) to complete a task and because he is a figure of authority, the characters accept having to complete the task by the end of the day without any attempts to alter that. One of the students, Claire Standish, is revealed to display the concept of narcissism, which is unfortunately a dark side of herself. This is evident as Claire claims that she is popular and loved by her fellow schoolmates and seems to care and showcase her rich and beauty too much. She is, as her detention-mates discover, full of herself. In addition this also shows signs of the spotlight effect theory which can relate to Claire in that she believes that her schoolmates look at her and pay so much attention to her appearance add rich, spoiled-like behavior. Another character to show a theory of social psychology is Allison Reynolds. In the film, Allison is a character with an introvert personality, although she also displays strange and...