Bad To The Bone Analysis

691 Words2 Pages

Most people think that people have to choice to choose between good and evil, but is it actually a choice? Can everyone choose good over evil? If one could choose if they do good or evil then why can’t they learn how to be good? This brings up the difference between sociopaths and psychopaths. Sociopaths can interact like normal empathetic people, while psychopaths cannot. A sociopath may interact normally with others while psychopaths will be closeted in. This shows that not all people have the choice between good or evil. Some are born with the ability to love while others were not, some were affected by environmental factors while others were not. This means that not everyone has the ability to choose good over evil.
In “Bad to the Bone”, Mark Dadds says “ Some children literally cannot see the love in their mother’s eyes[...] he suggests the ability to make eye contact is vital in learning how to love other people.” In two different twin studies, one in Sydney and one in London, scientists, young boys were unable to express their love towards their mothers. They were unable to look them in the eyes. This shows that even in they wanted to express their love, they were …show more content…

Handy says that “ He felt no compassion for the family members of his victims.” This insight of Handy’s thoughts reveal he does not regret doing what he did. Handy is an example of sociopath, a person who has chosen bad over evil due to environmental factors. He says “He felt lonely and misunderstood as a child, feelings he says contributed to his violent behavior as he grew up.” Environmental factors can have a serious result on one's values and actions, twins can grow up in different environments and become individualized. If environmental factors in Handy’s evil deeds then Handy did not have a choice for his internal violence, but he did have a choice in deciding whether he was going to murder

Open Document