statement made by Killroy which a witness claimed he had heard from him which was “ he would never miss an opportunity of firing upon the inhabitants”. It was understandable the soldiers did not like those in Boston any more than they like the British soldiers. Adams himself said this statement by Killroy was not against those killed that night, but a general statement against the colonists as a whole. This of course did not help the cause of the soldiers, but the point was made that the soldiers had not targets specific individuals to kill. Several of the witness attempted to place blame on Killroy for shooting John Gray, because several had placed Killroy at the Ropewalker fight that had broke out a few days earlier that Gray was a part. Many were of the impression Killroy was seeking revenge on Gray for what had happened that day. Other witnesses said that Killroy did not know Gray and there was no connection between the two men. Adams, also felt that these were false accusations and that the witness were grasping for evidence to indict the Killroy on false charges.
Adams then turns the blame of the gathering the group of sailor to Crispus Attackus. Witness James Bailey stated that he saw Attackus come from the area of Cornhill hill leading a group of twenty or thirty sailors. As mentioned earlier Attackus was a sailor himself. As Attackus and his group approached the group of soldiers witness claim he was shouting, “do not be afraid of them, they dare not fire, kill them, kill them, knock them over”! This does sound as though they were coming to assist the crowd, but to bring harm and death to the soldiers. What unknown to many is that Crispus Attackus the man leading this group went by a alias Michael Johnso...
... middle of paper ...
...e will ever know. Our future president, John Adams realized that even though he did not agree with the British occupation of Boston, he had to do what was right and defend the rights of these soldiers.
The Boston Massacre can teach a valuable lesson when looking at the history of the past. History must be observed from the perspective that those who may have recorded may have been bias in their own thoughts as they penned the events. As we look at what has been taught of the Boston Massacre we have for many years seen those that fell that day as the heroes of the revolution, However now we need to reexamine this event from the eyes of John Adams and ponder that these colonist that night were not fighting for their liberties or independence from Britain. The rioters were seeking to provoke a fight with eight British soldiers who had their backs against a wall.
The Boston Massacre was an event that could have never happened. The innocent lives could have been saved and the British troopers would have never been put on Trial. The aftermath of the lives been loss in Boston Massacre was a trial to punish the British Troopers and finally get them out America. The lawyer of the British troops was a man named John Adams, who was the cousin of Sam Adams. John’s role in the Boston Massacre trial was to represent his clients without negotiate his role as an American. Since John had to stand behind the British troops, he had to team up with different other lawyers to make sure the British troops be treated fair. John’s ethic perspective was deontological ethics because he may not believe the British troops
The Shoemaker and the Tea Party examines three main events, The American Revolution, The Boston Massacre, and the Boston Tea Party, and in which ways they are shaped as memories over time. Within the chapter labeled “Taming the Memory of the Revolution, 1783-1820,” Young goes on to discuss what it takes for an event to pass into a public memory. During the time of the American Revolution, so many negative events happened that many Americans did not want to past as memories, such as the Boston Massacre. Young makes a point that instead of remembering all of the negative events that happened, “exchange that Anniversary for Another,” (Young, 1999, 108). With that being said, The Boston Massacre happened on March 5, 1770, while the Declaration of Independence was adopted into Congress July 4, 1776 – the Fourth of July overshadowed March 5th,
...itish government. In Boston, the site of a bloody confrontation between British redcoats and Americans citizens less than 10 years before, emotions ran high. Boston was a center of agitation and finally on the night of December 16,1773, the course of world history was changed. A revolutionary event was on the horizon. As once patriot mournfully observed, “Our cause is righteous and I have no doubt of final success. But I see our generation, and perhaps out whole land, drown in blood.” (Liberty, 2) The rest is history.
The British army woke up the next morning and was amazed to see how much hard work took place that night by the American army. Since the British army was surrounded they had no other option but to surrender, and vacate the city.... ... middle of paper ... ... But he always learned from his mistakes.
For my whole life, I have lived in Boston. In 1773, me and some others went on to the British’s ship to protest. We threw 342 chests of tea into the Ocean. This had caused the Boston Tea Party. As I am serving in the war, young women at home are crushing on British soldiers, only for their handsomeness and red fancy coats. At one point Washington’s position was uncertain. Valley Forge was located about 18
Late in the war, 1778, was the point of Britain being close to defeat. Current commander of British forces was Lt. General Henry Clinton trying to stop this rebellion. He was thinking on how to do this with the North of America under Patriot control. Clinton then decided on turning to the South of the United States (www.theamericanrevolutiong.org). Fighting was becoming heavy between the militia and the United Kingdom’s forces (www.theamericanrevolution.org). However, General Clinton had once been to the South of the U.S. before, but failed in taking a key city (Charleston, South Carolina) by sea on June 28, 1776 (www.theamericanrevolution.org).
Most people have heard of The Boston tea party. When American patriots dressed as Mohawk Indians boarded the British ships in the Boston harbor and dumped all of the tea into the ocean. But what most people fail to realize is the great importance behind this protest. To fully understand a topic of history one must first acknowledge the actions behind it. The French and Indian war, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Revenue Act, as well as the Tea Act are all important catalysts of the legendary Boston tea party. Which is why we will discuss these topics before examining the events of the Boston tea party.
One night, on March 5, 1770, a street fight occurred between a group of American patriots and some British soldiers stationed in Boston. The Americans harassed the troops by yelling and shouting names at them and throwing snowballs and sticks. A crowd formed and in the noise and confusion, weapons were fired. In the end, ...
in the text it says (Boston gazette 4). One of the boys asked a group of British soldiers. "If they intended to murder people" the British had said “yes, by g-d, root and branch.” not so later one of had struck the young lad leaving a wound on him. The evidence helps prove that the British were trying to hurt the colonists. It proves this because when the boy asked they told him upfront and began to attack him when he was unarmed.
In a document on the Boston Massacre, it describes all the events in the Massacre. The document shows, “a group of young men began pelting some British soldiers with snowballs and curses.”. This quote shows how it was the colonists that started the fight. It caused the American Revolution because after the colonists attacked the British, they defended themselves and killed 5 colonists. The British killing the colonists was what started the American Revolution, so if the colonists did not attack the British thoughtlessly, than the Boston Massacre would not of happened in the first place. Also, in an eyewitness account of the Boston Tea party, it shows everything that the colonists did in the Boston Tea Party (Document 7). The document says “we had thus broken and thrown overboard every tea chest to be found in the ship, while those in the other ships were disposing of the tea in the same way.” There were many other ways the colonists could of told the British they would not pay the taxes, but they did a direct attack. The British’s punishment was placed because they knew it was the colonists during the attack. If they were a little bit more sneaky, than they could of have the same effect without having to face punishment. So, since they were “caught” the colonies had to face punishment, which kind of led to the American Revolution. The colonist’s actions were also a part of
The leader of the British, Captain Thomas Preston, gave an order to his soldiers not to fire, but his words were not clear and all the soldiers fired into the crowd. (The Coming of the American Revolution). There were five recorded deaths. One of the people that died was a man of black or Indian race named Crispus Attacks (History.com). The British troops arrived in Bosto...
...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
Captain Thomas Preston’s vision of the Boston massacre was an incident were a British soldier accidently fired his weapon and his men then followed after resulting in the death of five Bostonians including free black sailor Cripus Attucks. Starting the story Captain Thomas Preston admits that the arrival of the Majesty’s Troops were obnoxious to the inhabitants. Troops have done everything in their power to weaken the regiments by falsely propagating untruths about them. On Monday at 8 o’ clock two soldiers were beaten and townspeople then broke into two meetinghouses and rang the bells. But at 9 o’ clock some troops have informed Captain Thomas Preston that the bell was not ringing to give notice for a fire but to make the troops aware of the attack the towns people were going to bring upon them.
... to a miscommunication between the Captain and his soldiers. If the crowd had not been in such an uproar the Boston Massacre never would have happened. With all the testimony and the deposition from the Captain, the jury made the correct decision by determining Preston innocent.
The Boston Massacre was one the most controversial massacre in American history that teased the coming of the American Revolution. People were taunting a British soldier who was standing “in front of the Boston Custom House” who got very frustrated to the point where he hit somebody. The soldier got overwhelmed by people who came after he hit one of them, called help from his fellow soldiers. When Captain Preston and his soldiers arrived at the scene, people were coming from everywhere, some were trying to fight them and some were just there to watch. Then, one of the soldier shot at the people and his fellow soldiers started shooting after, which killed five people. This what ended it up being called the Boston Massacre. Some might say that the murderer were the soldiers who shot the people, but the real murderer is