Babylonian Flood

“THE CURSE OF CANAAN”

AFRICANS AND THEIR CANAANITE BROTHERS

After the flood had subsided, Noah became a farmer and planted a vineyard, and when the grapes were mature, he drank wine from the fermented grapes, and became drunk, while he was intoxicated, under the influence of alcohol, he was then naked, and his youngest son Ham saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside (Genesis 9:20-22).

The bible did not explained the full story of what actually happened that day between Noah and his youngest son Ham. However, based on what the bible had told us, it appeared that Ham had mocked his father while he was under the influence of alcohol, and laying in his tent naked. He went outside his father’s tent and told his two brothers of their father’s situation in the tent, probably mocking

The Canaanites were enslaved and under tributes as bondmen to their Hamitic brothers long before they were enslaved by any other ethnicity which fulfilled the first part of Noah’s curse upon Canaan. The curse of Noah upon Canaan was used by the Europeans to justify the enslavement of the black people of Sub-Saharan Africa from the descendants of Phut. There was no curse pronounced on any of Ham’s other three son’s descendants or was it mentioned in the bible, neither did the curse of Noah turned the African offspring’s of Ham into blackness since the skin pigmentation of most of Ham‘s offspring were not different from some Caucasian Europeans. The curse of Canaan have nothing to do with the black people of