Autozone Case Study

897 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of Christian ethics in business

AutoZone AutoZone first opened its doors in 1979 under the name Auto Shack. Presently Auto Shack is AutoZone, a fortune 500 organization and one of the leading auto parts store in the nation with approximately $8.1 billion in annual sales. AutoZone currently has stores in 48 states including Mexico and Puerto Rico with more than 65,000 employees. (AutoZone Inc., 2016) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc. Summary On 09/10/2010, a judgement was filed against AutoZone Inc. for wrongful employment practices by discriminating against an employee because of his religious beliefs. The AutoZone in question is located in Everett, Massachusetts. Mr. Mahoney Burroughs had been an employee of AutoZone since 2007 as a Senior …show more content…

It is clear that Mr. Burroughs religious rights were violated and was discriminated against under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42U.S.C. 2000 e-5(f)(1) and (3), and pursuant to Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981 a. In turn, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Massachusetts AutoZone in violation of Federal laws thus, ruling in favor of the EEOC and ordered AutoZone to pay $75,000 plus attorney fees. In addition to monetary relief arising from the judgement, AutoZone is also require to put in place a policy against discrimination, would have to train its management, human resource department, and all its employees on the new policy. Furthermore, for the following three years from judgement, the organization has to report to the EEOC all handling of requests for reasonable accommodations relating to religious beliefs. Exclusions to Consider Yes, there are exclusions to consider in this case as permitted by the Civil rights Act and they are as …show more content…

Organizations can’t limit religious expression more heavily than other forms of expression as long as it has a similar impact on efficiency in the workplace. Employee’s expressions cannot create discomfort to others. (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2016) Avoiding Religious Discrimination in the Workplace An organization could avoid any risk of discrimination happening in their workplace by having in place clear and detailed anti-harassment policies to include continuous training on the policies as well as new-hire a training plan. Consequences for employees not following anti-discrimination guidelines set in place by the organization should be upheld accordingly and each case treated with the outmost fairness in order to be effective. Moreover, employees who feel they are receiving unwelcome religious conduct should let the individual and follow through with letting management become aware if it does not stop.

Show More
Related

  • Case Study Of The Case EEOC V. Target Corporation

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the issues in the case EEOC v. Target Corp. is that the EEOC alleged that Target violated the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by engaging in race discrimination against African-American applicants who were interested in management positions. It is argued that Target did not give the opportunity to schedule an interview to plaintiffs, Kalisha White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown-Easley, because of racial discrimination. On the other hand, it argues that Target is in violation of the Act because the company failed to retain and present records that would determine if there was reason to believe that an unlawful practice had been committed.

    Read More

  • Mary Myers V. New York Transit Authority Case Study

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    In accordance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, any hiring, terminating, and other terms and conditions of employment utilized as means of religious discrimination against an employees is prohibited. Unless, the workers religious request was causing their employer undue hardship. These acts are mandated that employers reasonably accommodate their full time employees’. Reasonable

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Mamma Jo's Pizza '

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mamma Jo’s Pizza should accommodate their employee, Ahmad, and his need due to the fact that he wears his beard specifically for religious reasons. For discrimination based on religion, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Mamma Jo’s Pizza has the duty to “reasonably accommodate” employee’s “sincerely held” religious practices unless doing so would cause undue hardship to Mamma Jo’s business. If wearing a beard is a sincerely held religious practice for Ahmad, then Mamma Jo’s should make reasonable adjustments to the work environment that will allow him to fully practice his religion as long as these adjustments are not more than mere inconvenience. An example of an accommodation that Mamma Jo’s could make is a job reassignment. Mamma Jo’s no beard policy can be argued to be a business necessity for employees dealing with the food, so Ahmad could possibly do other tasks away from the food such as working at the cash register, answering the phone, or other clerical work.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Abercrombie And Fitch Case

    1462 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Court held that failing to accommodate a potential employee or an employee was enough to bring up a disparate treatment claim. It held that in order to make a claim based on disparate impact the plaintiff needs only to prove that the need for accommodation was the motive behind the employer’s refusal to hire them, not whether the employer knew about this need. Therefore, the Court determined that rather than imposing a knowledge standard, like the 10th Circuit Court did, motive was enough to violate Title VII since Abercrombie knew or suspected that Elauf wore the headscarf for religious reasons and did not want to accommodate her. “An employer may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions” (EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc., 2015). Finally, the Court held because of the description that Title VII gives for religion, it places religion as a protected class and therefore asks that it be given favored treatment over other

    Read More

  • Racial Inequality in America

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s world, the American still has barriers to overcome in the matter of racial equality. Whether it is being passed over for a promotion at the job or being underpaid, some people have to deal with unfair practice that would prevent someone of color or the opposite sex from having equal opportunity at the job. In 2004, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporation was a civil rights class-action suite that ruled in favor of the women who worked and did not received promotions, pay and certain job assignments. This proves that some corporations ignore the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination based on sex, race, religion or national origin.

    Read More

  • Sherbert V. Verner Case Analysis

    2001 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Sherbert v. Verner (1963), Ms. Adeil Sherbert challenged the South Carolina Employment Security Commission’s denial of her unemployment benefits. South Carolina refused to grant her assistance because she violated the Unemployment Compensation Act (UCA) by refusing to work on Saturday (the Sabbath Day of her faith). The Commission deemed this too weak a reason for her to avoid employment. In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled on First Amendment Free Exercise grounds in the appellant’s favor when reviewed. Critically, the Court writes, “[The] appellant’s conscientious objection to Saturday work constitutes no conduct prompted by religious principles of a kind within the reach of state legislation.” Moreover, Justice Brennan continues, “The

    Read More

  • Religious Accommodation Policy Change

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    In January 1986, S. Simcha Goldman filed a lawsuit and fought for freedom of religious expression for service members after receiving disciplinary action for failure to comply with uniform regulation while working as a medical officer in a military hospital (Military law review, 1986). This lawsuit eventually landed in the Supreme Court, and led to Chief Justice Warren E. Burger to question, “Where the logic of religious exemptions from the dress code would stop, in a nation with hundreds of denominations” ("High court pondering," 1986).

    Read More

  • No Excuse for Religious Discrimination

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    Religious Discrimination according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, involves treating a person (applicant or employee) unfavorably because of his or her religious beliefs. It can also involve treating someone differently because that person is married to or associated with an individual of a particular religion or because of his or her connection with a religious organization/group. Today, most twenty-first century managers are familiar with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that failing or refusing to accommodate an employee’s religious practices, or taking adverse employment action based on a person’s religion can result in charges of discrimination (EEOC). Therefore, managers should not use or inquire about an individual’s religious beliefs unless an accommodation is requested.

    Read More

  • Discrimination: Wiccans

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this article, the woman in question is Carole Smith, a security worker at a major airport who identifies as a Wiccan witch. She has had numerous incidents of workplace complaints from those she works with and she herself has filed complaints against her coworkers unrelated to her religion. However, all of these serious complains came in after her report of religious discrimination. These c...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    On August 8, the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. The court ruled that the Piscataway, N.J. Board of Education violated the Civil Rights Act when it fired Sharon Taxman, an "overrepresented" Jewish female school teacher, to make room for a black woman under the school system's affirmative action plan. The school district was ordered by the court to pay $144,000 in back pay. The judges' decision was based on their own investigation into the legislative history of Title VII ...

    Read More

  • Gender Inequality Essay

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ledbetter started working for Goodyear Tire Co. in 1979; she had been working there for about twenty years and there was no job she could not do. In 1998 she received an anonymous tip saying that she was being paid much less than the male worker. She was being paid $44,700 a year while the male workers were getting paid twenty-five percent more (Reah, 2008). Goodyear prohibited its employees from discussing their pay. Ledbetter took the situation to court. The discrimination was violating Title VII which prohibits discrimination in the workforce based on race and sex (NWLC, 2013). After she filed a complaint with the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), her case went to trial, and the jury awarded her backpay and approximately $3.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages for the extreme nature of the pay discrimination to which she had been subjected (NWLC, 2013). Goodyear claimed “Ledbetter had to had filed a pay discrimination claim within 180 days of first discriminatory paycheck even though she did not know about the discrimination” (Reah, 2008); the Supreme Court agreed with Goodyear’s claim and ruled against

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Editorial ' A Case Of Discrimination '

    1029 Words  | 3 Pages

    The editorial “A Case of Discrimination” published in the New York Times claims the Supreme Court should rule in favor of Hastings College of Law over the student group Christian Legal Society. The authors state the college has always had a non-discrimination policy that applied to all student groups and required them not to discriminate to receive official recognition from the college. They argue that Christian Legal Society had previously adhered to this policy and then in 2004 began to ask members to sign a statement of faith. Due to this, Hastings College of Law derecognized the student group and they sued claiming a denial of their First Amendment rights. Hastings College of Law wrote their policy to conform to California state law, which makes it illegal for state funded post-secondary educational institutions to discriminate based on religion or sexual orientation. Therefore, Hastings College of Law decided it was illegal for their student groups to discriminate as well. The Ninth Circuit decided in favor of Hastings College of Law declaring their rules viewpoint neutral and reasonable (1). Although the claim appears logical, actual evidence in support of their argument is difficult to find. Thus, their conclusion is probably false, because a decision in favor of Hastings College of Law denies their student groups their First Amendment rights and ignores years of legal precedent.

    Read More

  • Religious Discrimination

    2915 Words  | 6 Pages

    Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP. (2002, October). Religious discrimination – Accommodating differences in the workplace. Retrieved from: http://www.vssp.com/CM/Articles/articles871.asp

    Read More

  • Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    Harassment and discrimination can affect a business in many ways. Having a history of harassment and discrimination claims can damage a business’ reputation and affect its bottom line. It can cost the business current and future clients as well as investors and employees. Depending on the gravity of the claim(s), the process of settling the claim(s) can take anywhere from months to years. Meanwhile, the cost of the settlement and other fees continue to add up. A business might have to compensate the affected parties besides paying court fees and lawyers. The EEOC has seen a rise in monetary rewards from 7.5 million to 24.3 million (Glazer, 1996) However, all of these can be avoided by properly educating employers and employees about their rights and what harassment and discrimination entails.

    Read More

  • Religious Prejudice

    897 Words  | 2 Pages

    Discrimination based on or derived from religion has been a cause of significant suffering. Prejudice directed against people based on their religious beliefs, practice, identification or association has resulted in a wide range of discriminatory practices. Prejudice and discrimination based on religion continue to be problems even in countries that otherwise has achieved a high level of religious diversity. Prejudice based on religion has been used to justify discrimination against those with different religious beliefs, individuals of various ethnicities, those who are not exclus...

    Read More

More about Autozone Case Study

Open Document