Authoritarian- Leadership is a very direct leadership style where the leader tells the team members what needs to be done. This leadership can work well and effective where the control is most imperative for example an unskilled jobs. The advantages is that quickly decisions are made which means quick reaction, good for unexperienced team. Also the team members won’t have to think which means they just get on with the job set to them. The disadvantage is that there’s low team moral, and the team members only get talked to, they have …show more content…
Also would be used in the ambulance service when they are in accident scene they will share their ideas on how would be best to treat casualties.
Transactional- Leadership is a direct style of leadership which uses rewards and punishments to motivate the team. By using the rewards and punishment system, it helps improve the team’s performance.
The benefits of this leadership is that the worker will be more motivated to finish the task at a high standard as they want the rewards. The member also have clear vision of what is expected. One other advantage is that reward could be getting days off and pay rise or even getting promoted.
The negatives of this leadership is that workers might not be encouraged, and if they make mistake they will be punished which could be working overtime and extra work or doing something you don’t like. Also poor performance results in punishment which could be losing
…show more content…
Also most of the PS will use this leadership this is because in a PS the leader needs to be organized and give out clear instructions.
Transformational- Leadership style is a type of leadership style that focuses on team effectiveness as a whole by encouraging team members by talking about what will happen when the task is completed. It is about moving onward as a team rather than individuals. They also use Inspirational
It is concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long-term goals. It motivates a form of intelligence that moves followers to accomplish more of what is expected of them. (Northouse, 2016, pg.161). Transformational leadership can be used to influence people on a one to one level or to influence whole organizations and cultures. There’s a difference between transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Transactional leadership focuses more on leaders that uses gimmicks or promotions to get their followers to do certain things that they want. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, focuses more on connecting leaders with followers or employees to motivate and help them reach their full
Many countries have decided against having a totalitarian government system, but there still are countries that continue with running their country with authoritarianism. The Middle East persists on having an authoritarianism style government over having a democracy. Theories that prove to be true to Middle Eastern people of how a totalitarian government is better relate to economics, religion, and international involvement. People living in the Middle East want to avoid having political liberation because that can lead to a consistent and stable democratic government. Another reason keeping them from changing is that since their countries aren’t struggling economically, the citizens don’t see it necessary to elect new leaders. The countries in the Middle East region decide to continue with authoritarianism because the fear and pain is greater than the feeling of freedom.
Transformational leadership focuses on increasing employee motivation and engagement and attempts to link employees' sense of self with organizational values. This leadership style emphasizes leading by example, so followers can identify with the leader's vision and values.
Transformational leadership is the optimal style for a leader in an organization to have due mainly to its prominent characteristics such as being influential, innovative, motivating, proactive, and having the ability to both responsibly and reasonably delegate tasks. These aspects specific to the style of transformational leadership are essential to positive organizational function, environment, and advancement because they are characteristics that all hold power and constructive properties individually. When combined they are significantly capable of producing progress, change, and a healthy organizational environment.
The behavioral approaches of leadership are consisted of four parts and they are: task-oriented, relational-oriented, change-oriented, and passive behaviors leadership (Derure, 2011). Task-oriented is divided into four part and they are: initiating structure, contingent reward, management by exception-active, boundary spanning, and directive (Derure, 2011). The initiating structure of task-oriented can be built of group members, coordinating group, and determining standard of task performance to ensure that the task is perform (Derure, 2011).The transactional leader can be referred to the contingent reward because it is made clear to leader what task to perform and the rewards for meeting those expectations (Derure,
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
The transactional theory is another form of leadership development approach. It states that effectiveness in leadership depends on the leader focusing on the exchange between them and the followers, such as rewards and punishments (Baker,
The authoritarian style of leadership for many may seem harsh and extremely cut and dry. However that is not the case. For some people the best way to function is to create a system that works best for their planning ideas and methods. The Authoritarian style of leadership is the best method in this scenario. It allows one to plan in great detail how a scenario should play out and what each person involved should to do to meet the end goal. Perhaps because of the word authoritarian it seems
One of the advantages is that tasks will get done, regardless if completed by staff or leader. However, the leader takes full responsibility and credit for it. A disadvantage, according to Tromp and Blomme (2010), is “this autocratic leadership behavior can cause strain amongst followers, resulting in negative spillover effects” (p. 90). The staff may feel demoralized and underappreciated under this rule.
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
In transformation style, leadership style best for working but not effective. The process of the leadership style inspires and motivates employees to complete the work.
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
Leadership benefits in improving the aims of organization, values and vision. The leadership behavior and expertise have consistent association with organization efficiency and performance. Leaders involve motivating employees to encourage them attain the organizational objectives. Furthermore, operational heads not only motivate subordinates, but also ensure that
Transformational leadership focuses on what the leader can accomplish instead of his personal characteristics and how his relationship with others. This leader “helps to bring about major, positive changes by moving group members beyond their self-interests and toward the good of the group, organization, or society (Dubrin, 2007, p. 84). The essence of this leader is to develop and transform people.
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).