Introduction
Auditors’ liability and fraud is becoming a top agenda item for corporate governance involving the board and its directors in handling the business affairs that are ethical, efficient and profitable for investors and other stakeholders.
The role of an auditor is to express or form an independent opinion on truth and fair views of the financial statements resulting from firms’ operations in confirming that financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework and the company Act 2006 (ICAEW, 2013).
ISA 240 the Auditors’ Responsibility to consider fraud in auditing of financial statements states, ‘fraud is an intentional act by one or more individuals or management involving the use of deception to obtain an unjust or illegal advantage’ ( ICAEW, 2013). UK statute has been explained by the Fraud Act 2006, which came into existence in 2007, that clearly defines the Act in three categories such as fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose and fraud by abuse of position( Gray and Manson ,2011). The auditors’ liability on the other hand sets up a standard on the audit work indicating that auditors are not meant to be seen and known as simply exercising duty of care and skills in carrying out their work. Auditors’ responsibilities impose liabilities if things go wrong. Auditors’ liability can be classified into two ways such as liability under legislation either civil or criminal or liability arising from negligence under common law or civil liability. The civil code of many countries makes auditors liable to the third parties suffering loss as a result of relying on a negligently prepared audit report (ACCA, 2006). This report will analyse and explore furt...
... middle of paper ...
...ansparent, open manner with a high level of corporate social responsibility, coupled with the auditors be held more accountable for not exposing fraud that came to light during their audit activities and for compromising their independence and professional standards.
Recommendation
Careful review has been assessed to suggest that auditors’ liabilities and fraud come under tight imposition and practice of good and strong corporate governance where the board and its directors are deemed to be more responsible to detect high level and organised fraud. The auditors will provide professional opinion, by thorough examination of financial statements. This report supports the view that the board, its directors and management must thoroughly detect corporate fraud and intentional errors that set up to mislead the investors, shareholders, creditors and other stakeholders.
When it comes to the audit objectives, the public and the auditing profession maintain varying expectations. The public expects the prevention of fraud to be the auditor’s responsibility. However, the auditors believe that they are responsible for fraud detection, but not obliged to find all of it. In addition, the public views the fraud by the characteristics displayed by management and employees. For example, WoolEx Mills’ management wanted to exude a prevailing financial position and to uphold reputations. By committing financial statement fraud, it made the company look successful even though Sales and cash flows were decreasing. The public would view these particular characteristics as pressures to why the company committed fraud. Greed, recognition, and influences also impacted the public’s view of Wool Ex Mills’ fraud scheme. The CEO used authority to influence employees to take part in the fraud scheme. The public would see that the CEO utilized power to manipulate shareholders, which impacted their trust with WoolEx Mills (Cohen, Ding, Lesage, & Stolowy 2015) (Krishnan & Shah
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
With every business activity come opportunities for fraudulent behavior which leads to a greater demand for auditors with unscathed ethics. Nowadays, auditors are faced with a multitude of ethical issues, and it is even more problematic when the auditors fail to adhere to the standards of professional conducts as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The objective of this paper is to analyze the auditors’ compliance with the code of professional conduct in the way it relates to the effectiveness of their audits.
In today’s business world, an accountant and business owners should work together in order to become aware of scandals that occur in corporate companies. Since 2008 a series of corporate scandals and collapses have highlighted the importance of effective board oversight. One of the largest scandals in the corporate world was known as the Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. I will discuss the details of how an accountant allowed Maddoff to continue with his involvement in the Ponzi scheme. Since then, the board of accountancy is mandating that all corporate companies have good internal controls and getting more involved managing risks within the organization. This is becoming an essential role in maintaining a good system of internal control.
But the stakeholders play a very important role in preventing and deterring fraud. Stakeholders includes customers, suppliers, employees, the community and the government. Each play an important role since they have an interest in the integrity of financial reports of the publicly-traded company. Employees have a vested interest in the company’s success and they have a responsibility to protect their interest. Their roles may start from the bottom but they are key players in the company. To help deter or prevent financial statement fraud, the employee must report financial reporting fraud if it is detected. This can be done by way of a vigorous whistleblower program of some other tip line provided by the company. The community and its members, including the news media, can play a regulator role by confirming that the company is a good citizen with fair business practices. Shareholders should make sure that any company in which they’d like to invest is in compliance with standards of oversight and ethics. Investors need to play and active role also. They should be actively involved by monitoring the companies in which they invest. They should attend shareholder’s meeting regularly to discuss concerns and check the books of the company. This will allow them to stay current with what is going on within the company. Shareholders should always remain vigilant and make
In my opinion, fraud vulnerability of the selected organization had been assessed in a systematic way which helped the auditors in giving constructive suggestions for fraud prevention and detection in this case. The overall approach and methodology is very educative and it could be replicated in other environments too.
Introduction Within the current crisis of confidence in the public accounting profession after the Enron debacle and series of high profile failures of financial services firms, the issue of ‘audit expectation gap’ has never been more important. Though it would take an enormous amount of effort to address these issues, I will argue that tremendous amounts could be done in order to close the gap. In this essay, I will discuss some of these issues and in particular the strategies to reduce the gap. Definitions Various definitions have been proposed for the audit expectation gap.
Throughout the years, the news covered stories of corporate scandals involving unethical accounting practices. These unethical corporate acts had a tremendous negative impact on these company’s stockholders, investors, employees and the whole U.S. economy. Most of these scandals would have been prevented, if the independent audits of these companies were conducted in an ethical manner. With this in mind, two corporate scandals will be the subjects of further review to understand that an auditor might encounter ethical dilemmas, if independence and objectivity are not part of the audit process. An auditor should keep objectivity at all times.
Accounting ethics has been difficult to control as accountants and auditors must keep in mind the interest of the public while that they remain employed by the company they are auditing. The accountants should take into account how to best apply accounting standards when company faces issues related financial loss. The role of accountant is crucial to society. They serve as financial reporters to owe their primary constraint to public interest. The information provided is critical in aiding managers, investors and others in making crucial economic decisions. An accountant is responsible for any fraudulent financial reporting. Some examples of fraudulent reporting are:
Kent has a misconception that auditors have no specific duties regarding fraud. Furthermore, Kent also mentions that auditor provides no assurances about fraud because that is management’s job. In fact, auditors do not have duty to detect fraud. However, it is an auditor responsibility to detect material misstatements in the financial statement. Auditors are required to identify and assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud and design procedures to detect such misstatement.
The principle territory we are planning to address is accounting fraud and how it could impact an organization by answering, the who, what, when and how. Its goal is to increase the awareness of accounting fraud and fraud counteraction. The intriguing thing about accounting fraud is that little disclosure as a rule usually leads to an enormous increase in fraud. A number of categories and sub-categories can be divided up for fraud.
This shows how a lack of transparency in reporting of financial statements leads to the destruction of a company. This all happened under the watchful eye of an auditor, Arthur Andersen. After this scandal, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was changed to keep into account the role of the auditors and how they can help in preventing such
...e financial reports and statements are correct. This auditing will be conducted by auditing department of the organization, even may be done by an independent auditor who is not part of the organization, and sometimes public officials are elected. In case of unmatched consequences the organization need to give explanation on the misrepresentation of wrong statements. Auditors purpose is then to ensure that the misrepresentations are corrected, then maintain accurate, reliable financial documents and statements.
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.