Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
FIVE Objectives of standard and guidelines IN AUDITING
Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
FIVE Objectives of standard and guidelines IN AUDITING
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Auditors are well trained, professional people with a clear financial incentive to regulate their affairs properly so they should be left alone to do this rather than be subject to external regulation".
An auditor conducts an unbiased examination and assessment of the financial statements of a business/organisation. This examination can either be done internally or externally. Auditors are closely monitored and firmly regulated, breaches of rules can result in serve costs. Through government legislation e.g. Companies Act 2004 and the Statutory 2006 the government decides who should oversee and regulate the work of auditors. Furthermore the Financial Reporting Council watches over the audit profession, and works closely with the ICAEW who also regulate the work of auditors. The finest explanation of auditor independence (lack of regulation) can be found in the Statement on Auditing Standards (Paragraph 2, Section 220). The Statement on Auditing Standards conditions the auditor “must be without bias with respect to the client under audit”, adding on it states that “independence does not imply the attitude of a prosecutor but rather a judicial impartiality”. As further high profile business scandals came to light over the past few years, the importance of auditor regulation has significantly grown. There has been an increase in discussion whether auditors should remain free from external regulation or not. Therefore this essay will conclude whether or not auditors should regulate their affairs without external regulation.
Auditor regulation ensures that the fundamental principle of accounting, objectivity and integrity is maintained. Auditors should remain objective when conducting the financial report, failure of being objectiv...
... middle of paper ...
...bility and reliability of the financial report is crucial as it also directly affects the users of the financial report, such as shareholders. Regulation can ensure that reliability and credibility maintained to high standards. Auditors can fulfil their required job whilst being unregulated, if they remain both professional and ethical. Adding on, external regulation has proved to be faulty at times, which is significant as a lot of time and money is gone into regulating auditors and clients. However it’s extremely difficult to operate without regulation as auditors may work in a bias environment and also may develop a relationship with the client. It’s crucial that auditors remain objective and unbiased, external regulation ensures that auditors are. Therefore auditors shouldn’t be left alone to regulate their own affairs but however be under externally regulation.
Consult PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3520. What is the auditor independence, and what is its significance to the audit profession? What is the difference between independence in appearance and independence in fact?
Individual Article Review Lily Cobian LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Ramon E. Ortiz-Velez Individual Article Review Introduction My article review is based on Sarbanes-Oxley and audit failure, a critical examination why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was established and why it is not a guarantee to prevent failure of audits. Sarbanes-Oxley Act talks about scandals of Enron which occurred in 2001 and even more appalling the company’s auditor, Arthur Anderson, found guilty of shredding company documents after finding out Enron Company was going to be audited. The exorbitant amounts of money auditors get paid to hide audit discrepancies was also beyond belief. The article went on to explain many companies hire relatives or friends to do their audits, resulting in fraud, money embezzlement, corruption and even the demise of companies. Resulting in the public losing faith in the accounting profession, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 by congress was designed to restrict what company owners and auditors can and cannot do. From what I gathered in the article, ever since the implementation of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act there has been somewhat of an improvement but questions are still being asked as to why there are still issues that are not being targeted in hopes of preventing more audit failures. The article also talked about four common causes of audit failure: unintentional auditor mistakes, fraud, fatigue and auditor client relationships. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct clearly states an independent auditor because it produces a credible audit, however, when there is conflict of interest, the relation of a former employer, or a relative or even the fear of getting fire...
The term “fraud” is commonly used to describe the use of deception to deprive, disadvantage or cause loss to another person or party. This can include theft, the misuse of funds or other resources, or more complicated crimes such as false accounting and the supply of false information. This case study of Mountain State Sporting Goods is an excellent example of individuals acting on the opportunity to financial benefit by committing what they thought was harmless adjustments, but in reality was fraud. In this case study there are is just so much wrong with this company and how it operates. We noticed multiple areas of concern before even seeing the financial statements and my concerns were confirmed upon further investigation.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, by authority of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is responsible for the creation of auditing and the associated professional practice standards for registered public accounting firms to abide by when preparing and issuing audit reports. The auditing standards relating to audit risk, audit evidence, and the relationship of auditing standards to quality control are outlined in Auditing Standards 1101, 1105, and 1110. This block of standards enumerates the general concepts relating to auditing standards.
With every business activity come opportunities for fraudulent behavior which leads to a greater demand for auditors with unscathed ethics. Nowadays, auditors are faced with a multitude of ethical issues, and it is even more problematic when the auditors fail to adhere to the standards of professional conducts as prescribed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The objective of this paper is to analyze the auditors’ compliance with the code of professional conduct in the way it relates to the effectiveness of their audits.
According to the article authored by Mark Rupert, what are the seven best practices in the roles and responsibilities of an internal audit function?
The three main stages of the audit process are the pre-audit, audit, and post-audit. During the pre-audit the most important things are planning and execution. The first part of the pre-audit is scheduling the audit. Every facility in the organization will need to be audited so creating a schedule will allow for preparation time. Production schedules, management schedules, vacation time, and time between audits are all important and this needs to be organized to have an efficient audit. Proper communications goes hand in hand with scheduling. The auditor needs to communicate all that will be expected prior the audit to ensure that employees or other considerations are in place. The next thing that needs planned for is the number of auditors.
When I hear the word ‘Forensic’ the idea and image of a homicide investigation in which evidence gathered is analyzed at a laboratory to determine ‘who done it’. Shows like CSI, Bones, Law and Order depicts the forensic aspect in their broadcast. Being a registered nurse, another thought comes to mind when hearing the term ‘forensic’. I like to watch Dr. G medical examiner on the Discovery channel. That is a reality show regarding investigative research on how a person died. This is done by performing an autopsy and analyzing the pathological reason for a death to determine if foul play was involved. However, I rarely placed the thought that accounting can have a forensic aspect, too. I was always under the impression that auditors were the forensic accountants. Internal Revenue Agents to audit income tax filings to make sure all income are reported, and deductions have receipts as supporting evidence. Certified Internal Auditors to look at business operations and financial statements within a corporation to make sure internal controls are in place, financial statements are properly recorded, and government regulations have been met. External auditors perform audits for SEC compliance and to attest that the company is in good standings to ensure protection of the public interest. These auditors, in essence, would be able to detect fraud in their job when reviewing audit trails and documentations. Needless to say, I my conception have been construed. There is a whole new field of accounting that is on the rise, which specifically deals with fraud detection. This is called Forensic Accounting. This area sparked my interest.
The main role in relation to fraud prevention is the operation of appropriate systems of internal controls, with proper segregation of duties and good corporate governance (this reflects the culture and practices of the organisation). The auditor has to assess and report on the adequacy of these systems of internal controls and segregation of duties. This gives confidence to the users of the financial statements of how the organisation operates on a daily basis. Auditors are in a way act as eyes and ears for users of financial statements into an organisation. They offer both an insight into an organisation and are supposed to act as protector of the law ensuring proper accounting standards
...e financial reports and statements are correct. This auditing will be conducted by auditing department of the organization, even may be done by an independent auditor who is not part of the organization, and sometimes public officials are elected. In case of unmatched consequences the organization need to give explanation on the misrepresentation of wrong statements. Auditors purpose is then to ensure that the misrepresentations are corrected, then maintain accurate, reliable financial documents and statements.
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.
The complete destruction of companies including Arthur Andersen, HealthSouth, and Enron, revealed a significant weakness in the United States audit system. The significant weakness is the failure to deliver true independence between the auditors and their clients. In each of these companies there was deviation from professional rules of conduct resulting from the pressures of clients placed upon their auditors (Goldman, and Barlev 857-859). Over the years, client and auditor relationships were intertwined tightly putting aside the unbiased function of auditors. Auditor careers depended on the success of their client (Kaplan 363-383). Auditors found themselves in situations that put their profession in a questionable time driving them to compromise their ethics, professionalism, objectivity, and their independence from the company. A vital trust relationship role for independent auditors has been woven in society and this role is essential for the effective functioning of the financial economic system (Guiral, Rogers, Ruiz, and Gonzalo 155-166). However, the financial world has lost confidence in the trustworthiness of auditor firms. There are three potential threats to auditor independence: executives hiring and firing auditors, auditors taking positions the client instead of the unbiased place, and auditors providing non audit services to clients (Moore, Tetlock, Tanlu, and Bazerman 10-29).
...pendence, whether pro forma or substantially, the quality of professional assurance service of professional accountants will be doubted by public and that will probably lead to serious results. The factors affecting independence of external auditors are multiple. Market competition among external auditors and the imperfection of laws regulated the external auditing industry are tow of most important factors. In order to maintain and guarantee the independence of external auditors and try to avoid the scandals like Arthur Andersen, some research on how to improve and maintain the independence of external auditors are necessary. It is possible for researchers to put emphasis on how to control the market competition among auditing organizations and enhance the ability of accounting regulators to supervise and manage the professional accounting industry in the future.
The major characters of the tradition audit are all information what is needed by auditors are on the paper and the manual calculators and without high communication technology. Auditors usually were limited by the place in the paper time. When a several people are working on the same auditing project for a client with offices in cities across the country, even worldwide, it takes a lots all time those auditors get the information which they need from the client, even there is risk paper information disappear for many reasons. on the another hand, mail paper information increase the auditing cost. The mistake caused by the manual calculators inevitably, no matter how fixed auditors concentrate on recalculate is, after all auditors are human. The global business become major in the modern business world, some example, several auditors who are in different locations are working a same auditing project, or auditors are in different city even country with the client, when there is issue among these auditors or between auditors and client, they only can communicate with each other by phone or be together and have meeting. Phone call can not make sure information been watched in the same time when the voice is talking about the issue, but having a meeting takes time and money make all people together, it increases auditing cost.