Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference in Spartan and Athenian political systems
Athens vs rome
Athens vs sparta who is superior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference in Spartan and Athenian political systems
Ancient Greece had several cities, two of the most famous and influential being Athens and Sparta. Despite practicing the same language, these two cities certainly had a substantial number of differences between them. Several components of these cities were different from each other, such as their morals and lifestyles. I personally believe that Sparta was the superior city, due to their government, military, and womens rights.
The government/political structures of Sparta and Athens are quite different from each other. Sparta had a type of government called “oligarchy.” Basically, this means that there was a small group of people who had control of the region. In this case, Sparta was ruled by a small group of retired warriors, explaining
The governments of these two city-states were not alike in many ways. “It is true that our government is called a democracy, because its administration is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many,” (Document 3). Athens’ government was what we would consider today a direct democracy. This means that their government was run by the people, or in other words “the many”, rather than a couple government officials, or “the few”. Although Athens was running their city as a government by the people, Sparta had a different form of government. “it is made up of oligarchy, monarchy, and democracy,
Ancient Greece today is most known for the culture: the gods, the dramas, how people lived. What most people do not realize is that there were hundreds, maybe even thousands, of different civilizations spread throughout Greece that all had different forms of government. The three main ones were Athens, Sparta, and Miletus. Each was very different from the other. The most powerful out of all three was Sparta: a military based society. The Spartan government had a strong foundation that was all torn down by one bad leader.
Sparta, also called Lacedaemon, was a city in ancient Greece, and one of the most famous ancient Greek cities of the Peloponnesus. Found in the hills of Mount Taygetus many would consider was a brutal group of militaristic people. Although, this to some extent may be true most of the written information was derived from the ancient city-state of Athens, who were great enemies of the Spartan society.
Spartan culture is a great example of how a society’s infrastructure will directly affect both, its social structure and superstructure. It also serves as a warning that any society that becomes too rigid in its structure and too static in its values will not last long when confronted with more agile and adaptable cultures. This paper will explore why Sparta became the Hellenic army par excellence, how this worked to create a very specific social structure founded on martial values, and, finally, how that social structure would ultimately be the undoing of the culture.
Sparta was a key city state which was located on the Peloponnesian Peninsula in southern Greek, which today is referred to as Laconia. Sparta is historically known for their strong military training, warfare tactics, and numerous victories. This city state included full citizens known as the Spartans, the helots, and the Perioeci. The men of Sparta had a main obligation to become strong warriors, fight with their brothers, and protect against any invasions or attacks. The helots where owned by city state of Sparta. They came from Messenia and were forced into slavery after being invaded by the Spartans in c.735. The helot’s responsibilities included farming, being of help if needed during battles, used as nurses, and for any other task that need to be accomplished. Unlike many traditional slaves, the Messenia’s were given certain leeway. They had
Athens and Sparta were all very big, successful city-states in the ancient world that conquered many lands and won many battles. Ancient Athens and Ancient Sparta seem similar; they have very different functioning societies. Athens was known for its impressive art and culture while Sparta was a very war-like city-state and their society was completely based on having a great military. The thing they had in common was that social status and the jobs that each rank of society had was very important. The social status was crucial to Sparta and Athens because, without it, both Greek city-states would not be able to function.
This article is credible and reliable; it offers two sets of information for the reader. It is also suitable for any age group. This site is helpful for those wanting to compare Athens and Sparta or simply read about one or the other.
Sparta and Athens - Explain and Contrast Both Sparta and Athens were Greek city-states. Sparta was a strict military ruled city-state where the people established themselves as a military power early. However Athens was more of a political city-state that was more involved with their economical stature than their military forces. Still changes from the Persian wars would change the powers of the city-state and somewhat unite them.
In ancient Greece during the 7th and 8th centuries, different armies and cities were fighting for control of land and power. During this time period, it was very gruesome and many people died because different states wanted to expand their control over new territories so they could gain more power. With all the different armies and militaries fighting for control, there was one that stood out as the elite of all militaries, Sparta. Quickly Sparta became known throughout Greece as the most highly disciplined and coordinated militaries in the world.
Sparta contained a four branch government system that was considered among the most unique in all of Greece. Unlike the democracy of Athens, Sparta was based on an oligarchy structure. The diarchy, which consisted of two kings, was the first division of this government. These figures held little influence over the state and served more as a symbol of royal heritage (Kennell 83). The second branch was the Gerousia council which acted as an advising body and hel...
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
Athens was a much more superior polis compared to Sparta because the Athenians invented new ideas and creations that supported the people, such as democracy, the Athenians led the Delian League, and Sparta created the Peloponnesian League after the Athenians created their alliance, and the Athenians changed the ways of their government many times to suit the people, and the Spartans did not.
The Spartans and the Athenians both used clever strategies to try to win the war; the Spartans tried to defeat the Athenians by using a psychological strategy and an economic strategy while the Athenians used political and economic strategies. Sparta’s first strategy was to try and get Athens to fight them on land. Because the Spartans could battle on land very well, they tried to force the Athenians to attack them on land; they tried to do this by using a psychological strategy. The Spartans landed in Athens and burnt all of the fields, crops, and houses that were outside of the Long Walls. They hoped that this would be enough to cause Athens to fight, but it was not. While this strategy was unable to get a reaction out of Athens, it did cause
Living in Athens or Sparta were provided two very different experiences for their citizens and it has been a highly contested topic as to which place was the best to live in. However, it is undeniable that Athens was most certainly the better place to reside in. This is because Athens had a superior form of government, a strong focus on education and, finally, a wide range of careers that one could pursue. Athens was a better place to live in than Sparta because it had a superior form of government. Athens’ system of
Sparta was a warrior society in ancient Greece that reached the height of its power after defeating rival city-state Athens in the Peloponnesian War in 431-404 B.C. It was a city-state devoted to military training and was the greatest military power of Greece. Despite their military ability the Spartans dominance was short-lived in 371 B.C. they were defeated by Thebes at the Battle of Leuctra, and their empire went into a long period of decline. Sparta’s significance was their very well trained, impressive, and powerful army.