Why its time to reform the Electoral College Even though the Electoral college worked in the past it isn’t working for the present. The Electoral College was created to help elect a president. How that works is the 50 states are assigned so many voting representatives depending on population in that state. This worked in the past due to most states population was equal but in present times its not so some states have more of a say so in electing the president of The United States. Even though the Electoral College worked in the past, it needs to be change for the present and these reasons are; it gives bigger states more votes and is unfair to smaller states (Clayton) The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was dominated by political compromise.
This dilutes the representation of each citizen to the majority in its area, which is unjust and unfair for the minority, which should still be able to voice their opinion and let their voice be heard. The Electoral College was put in place because it was believed a popular vote gave too much power to high-populated areas. How is that different from creating representation in the Electoral College based on the representatives in Congress, since the House of Representatives is also based on population? Signifying that the population still has an effect on how the President is elected. Another view is that not every citizen, at the time white male, was knowledgeable enough to elect the Head of State without the Electoral system.
A true democracy is nearly impossible to attain since the ancient Athenians. However, many countries have tried very hard to get democratic governmental systems up and running. Operating a democratic government requires many different aspects of the nation to run efficiently. One of the many ingredients to a well-run democracy is a politically active and participant citizen population. Without a high count of political participation and a complete use of free speech and freedom of the press, no country can be deemed democratic.
Thus, this system discriminates people who live in states with high turnout. Rather than having statewide electoral vote distribution, vote distribution in congressional district could be little more effective in way to represent people’s will. Upon this defectiveness of Electoral system, current system is failure the way it mislead results and misrepresent population. This system is being used to choose our president for a long time and it is hard to find a replacement for it, but little effective change in the system is possible. If that is done, that change may bring huge breakthrough to the way we Americans see election.
It's also a point of view that might be the source of resentment for many Americans who are unhappy with our government right now. Why would that be? Because the U.S. is actually not a pure democracy, as I'm sure you already knew, but a republic. This means the government is set up in such a way that the people as a whole elect their leaders, those who they think would best represent them, and then those leaders handle the big issues, such as foreign policy, legislation, or legal interpretation. In principle this is a good system, since it would be virtually impossible for everyone in the U.S. to vote on every issue facing our nation.
People in smaller state has more voting power, which leaves the people in the large states voiceless. One of the reason the Framers incorporated this system was because they didn 't fully trust regular people to make the decision. People have influence and power to decide the president but not directly. Our direct influence is electing the House of Representatives so that they will represent you. Although people are foolish and ignorant and tend to make a biased decision, this electoral college isn 't fully representing the majority of the people and being contrary with the 6 principles of Constitution.
Many people feel that the “popular election of presidents would work a diminution of the political power of racial and other minority groups in the nation’s urban centers” (B... ... middle of paper ... ...can make all of the difference” (Bickel 50). Strangely enough, “the presidential nominees tend to come from big states and tend to run on platforms likely to appeal to interest groups that cluster there” (Polsby 46). The government’s deciding to continue to utilize the college is a drastic mistake. Ultimately, the establishment of popular vote as a means for electing the president offers a new hope for constituents in a political system which often leaves them disillusioned. Bibliography: 1.
The voters vote for parties rather than candidates. In th... ... middle of paper ... ... government can vary greatly from country to country. In this system, when the President and Premier are from different political parties, the government is cohabited. If the president's party win the elections, the system resembles the presidentialism, where Premier is "weak" and state policy is executed by President. In opposite, if the president's party loses elections, President just becomes a figurehead, delegates the comptences to the Premier.
No other place in the world has such a diverse population as America’s; there are over 311 languages and about 310 recognized religions in the US. It is this diversity that makes America what it is and, at the same time, creates the challenges it faces. With so much diversity and different interests, it is difficult for presidential candidates to appeal to everyone, therefore the process is selective. While some may argue that money and campaign finance is driving force in politics, the result from recent elections show that just having money isn’t enough to win the office. Because America has such a divided demography, it is crucial that aspiring candidates pay attention to public opinion as it is the single most important thing in identifying with voters.
However, neither one of them is necessarily superior to the other. During at elections one can notice a key difference between the two systems. In a parliamentary system the people of the nation elect a political party to represent their interests. Then the party that gains the majority of the votes elects, or may already have elected, someone to be their spokesperson who becomes the Prime Minister of said nation. In a presidential system, on the other hand, the people elect individual persons to become the President and members of the congress, in separate elections.