Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay

opinion Essay

953 words

Imagine you are diagnosed as a terminally ill patient. It is pre-determined that you are going to die in a matter of 6 months, whether dementia is dehumanizing you day by day, or you’re physically being detained from leaving your hospice bed. Whether you would even opt for assisted suicide or not, wouldn’t you want to at least have the choice to peacefully end your life that has already been confirmed to end in a matter of months? You would not only have the option of when you would want to end your life, but how, and surrounded by the people you love. As an American, we are all given the right to say, believe, and act as we want—without harming others—due to the 1st amendment of the constitution. If assisted suicide is illegal, doesn’t that take away our very right to live the life we want? If one is in so much pain, and has been diagnosed as a terminally ill patient, and they want to end their life in a dignified manner surrounded by their loved ones, isn’t it only fair to give them that option? Some may worry that the legalization of PAS may have a slippery slope. It would “trickle” down to clinically depressed people, or people who may survive but are sick of being in constant pain everyday. However, the laws where PAS is legal are not taken loosely. They take the requirements to follow through with PAS very seriously. One must be a legal adult of the age 18. The patient must be proven “capable” by a judge of making the decision to take their own life. The consulting physician must find the diagnosis and prognosis of their patient’s disease and state they are terminally ill. The patient must be a resident of Oregon. They must have two written requests with witnesses—one of which must not be a relative of blood, adoption, or ... ... middle of paper ... ...ve the life we want, so why can’t we die the way we want as well? A soldier can fight for our country and die a dignified man, knowing he died protecting something he loved, so why can’t one have the choice to die in a dignified manner, happy with the life they have lived, before the torturous process of their incurable disease overtakes them. Physician assisted suicide is a choice. A choice of how to beat an inevitable death. It is in no way a path for everyone. If one’s idea of dying proud is fighting to the end, and letting their ailment engulf them, then that is their choice. Or if leaving this earth at peace, and being able to say “I lived a great life, and I intend to leave feeling accomplished”, is another’s way of dying dignified then so be it. It’s not about which option is taken, it’s that either way, we should have a choice and it should be ours to make.

In this essay, the author

Opines that if assisted suicide is illegal, doesn't it take away our right to live the life we want?
Opines that the legalization of pas would "trickle" down to clinically depressed people, or people who may survive but are sick of being in constant pain everyday.
Explains that most people would not take their lives unless there was a legitimate reason. the elimination of physician aid to terminally ill patients was considered unconstitutional.

Opines that if assisted suicide is illegal, doesn't it take away our right to live the life we want?
Opines that the legalization of pas would "trickle" down to clinically depressed people, or people who may survive but are sick of being in constant pain everyday.
Explains that most people would not take their lives unless there was a legitimate reason. the elimination of physician aid to terminally ill patients was considered unconstitutional.
Describes physician assisted suicide as the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies.
Opines that the government is supposed to protect its citizens, but taking away their right to a short, peaceful death and leaving them with the day to day suffering does the opposite of protection.
Opines that physician assisted suicide is a choice of how to beat an inevitable death. if one's idea of dying proud is fighting to the end, then that is their choice.

Click here to unlock this and over one million essays

Continue Reading Check Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!

The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
opinion essay
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that doctors will violate their oath, and innocent people will be dying along with the pas patients.
- Opines that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would cause problems with the development of cures for new diseases or new strands of disease.
- Argues that the physician-assisted suicide movement has many flaws that could potentially create a downfall in our health system.
- Opines that doctors will violate their oath, and innocent people will be dying along with the pas patients.
- Opines that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would cause problems with the development of cures for new diseases or new strands of disease.
- Argues that the physician-assisted suicide movement has many flaws that could potentially create a downfall in our health system.
- Opines that pas should be banned everywhere, since it violates the hippocratic oath, letting innocent people die a preventable death, and the struggles with new diseases.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide (pas) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. it violates the hippocratic oath.
1385 words
Read More
Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
analytical essay
Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives as healthy people do. Although there are certainly several debates against this viewpoint on assisted suicide, it is not up to ethicists to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the ill and infirm. As it stands, there is a solid argument in favor of human euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. Patients have a right to make their own decisions to preserve free choice and human dignity. This right includes the right to choose assisted suicide. Having access to physician-assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and merciful manner.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the right to physician assisted suicide should be granted to all citizens suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives as healthy people.
- Opines that the most contentious debate about assisted suicide is when it is assisted by a physician as opposed to private citizen or family member. the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community and ethicists.
- Argues that the medical community should end pain and suffering by offering terminally ill patients an end to their life.
- Argues that the right to physician assisted suicide should be granted to all citizens suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives as healthy people.
- Opines that the most contentious debate about assisted suicide is when it is assisted by a physician as opposed to private citizen or family member. the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community and ethicists.
- Argues that the medical community should end pain and suffering by offering terminally ill patients an end to their life.
- Argues that assisted suicide is cruel and inhumane since doctors are designated with the role of healing people, but terminally ill patients are forced to live against their will in unmanageable pain.
- Opines that the financial implications of keeping a loved one alive against his or her will are valid concerns for terminally ill patients.
- Opines that a botched suicide could have devastating consequences for the patient, but it should be the right of every citizen to escape unnecessary pain and suffering
- Explains that assisted suicide proponents view the issue as a matter of personal freedom and private choice, but many on the other side of the debate think about it in terms of ethics and religion.
- Explains that the issue of physician-assisted suicide is complex because sentiment about the practice ranges from strong support for personal freedoms to religious backlash that insists it is murder and against the teachings of god.
- Explains that the debate is complex because the core values of each side are rooted in two entirely different areas. those who approve of physician-assisted suicide are more likely to support their ideas with comments about individual freedom.
1295 words
Read More
Physician Assisted Suicide: The Right To Choose
opinion essay
Physician-assisted suicide occurs when a physician facilitates a patient’s death by providing the necessary means and/or information to enable the patient to perform the life-ending act (AMA).Each and every human being knows that there will come a time when his or her life will come to an end. When, where, and how are some of the scariest things any of us have to think about. Everyday, people commit suicide because they are too scared to face the life they have ahead of them. Those who fail to actually end their lives are not punished, but are actually pitied and given a tremendous amount of help. What about those people who are too sick, or are in too much pain to actually carry out the act of suicide there selves? Should they be made to suffer for the rest of their lives, even though they might only have a couple of months, even weeks? Dr. Kevorkian, as well as other physicians, offer these kinds of people another option, a painless injection or a few short breaths of carbon monoxide to end all of their suffering. It isn’t fair for those of us who aren’t suffering, or those of us who have strong religious beliefs, to impose our feelings of what is morally or ethically wrong on the rest of society. Suicide is not an illegal act in this country, no one gets punished for attempting suicide, it’s only assisted suicide that is illegal. Ultimately, assisted suicide is a question of choice and empowering people to have control over their own bodies.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that jack kevorkian, the most recognized physician performing assisted suicide, was sentenced to ten to twenty-five years in prison for second degree murder and three to seven years for delivery of a controlled substance.
- Opines that assisted suicide is a question of choice and empowering people to have control over their own bodies.
- Explains that the earliest american statute to outlaw assisted suicide was enacted in new york, act of dec. 10, 1828.
- Explains that jack kevorkian, the most recognized physician performing assisted suicide, was sentenced to ten to twenty-five years in prison for second degree murder and three to seven years for delivery of a controlled substance.
- Opines that assisted suicide is a question of choice and empowering people to have control over their own bodies.
- Explains that the earliest american statute to outlaw assisted suicide was enacted in new york, act of dec. 10, 1828.
- Explains that a survey by baylor college of medicine in 1997 showed that 44.5 percent of ordinary doctors favor legalization of physician-assisted suicide, while 33.9 percent are opposed and the other 21.6 percent were unsure.
- Explains that the american medical association (ama) has taken a strong position on the issue of euthanasia.
- Explains that california and washington state are known for their aid-in-dying initiatives. oregon's efforts paid off when it became the first jurisdiction to legalize assisted suicide.
- Reports that the oregon state health division reviewed the first year of the law's implementation and found that it was working well and had not been subject to abuse.
- Describes dr. jack kevorkian as the most well-known physician to perform assisted suicide. he has admitted to assisting at least 45 terminally ill patients.
- Explains that even patients who didn't receive regular health care by dr. kevorkian sought him out to have a painless death.
- Explains that people are starting to grasp the concept of assisted suicide in a whole new way.
- Opines that assisted suicide is in the patient's best interest and the government should not oppose it.
- Argues that legalizing physician-assisted suicide would respect the patient’s freedom or choice while providing safeguards to protect their rights.
- Opines that legalizing assisted suicide would respect competent adults' right to choose death instead of prolonged misery.
- Opines that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would give people the assurance that if they are most likely going to have a painful death they can have options.
- Opines that separation of church and state is a very important part of our government and that it should be the right of terminally ill patients to decide if they want to seek out physician-assisted suicide
2608 words
Read More
Persuasive Essay Euthanasia
opinion essay
Derek Humphry’s intentions were to help terminally ill people die peacefully (“The Evolution of America’s Right-to-Die”). For other individuals who helped with assisted suicide they claim is is no different from taking a person off a ventilator or helped them stop dialysis, the decision is big, but it’s what is suppose to be done when a patient is suffering (“The Evolution of America’s Right-to-Die”). Derek Humphry had created an organization that Americans thought was crazy and unnecessary, “ And everybody said I was crazy- America was not ready for physician-assisted suicide. And I said, ‘oh, I think it is.’ And so I started out on a lonely path in 1980, campaigning for the right to choose to die when terminally ill” (“The Evolution of America’s Right-to-Die”). Most causes for legalizing euthanasia stem from unrelieved or undertreated pain of patients, with today’s modern technology, a lot of pain felt by patients can not be properly treated. However, most individuals seeking physician assisted suicide are usually well off and educated (“Stigma Around Physician-Assisted Dying Linger”). With patients having control about receiving or denying medical treatment, the decision to receive lethal injection or medication should also be within the rights of the patient. By giving a short or quick death a patient 's autonomy is still respected and shows
In this essay, the author
- Opines that euthanasia would end intolerable pain and give the patient the right and dignity to make a decision about their own lives.
- Describes compassion in dying as an organization that works with terminally ill patients to make them more aware of all their options for a peaceful death.
- Describes how the hemlock society was founded by derek humphry after helping his wife, who was dying of breast cancer, take her own life.
- Opines that euthanasia would end intolerable pain and give the patient the right and dignity to make a decision about their own lives.
- Describes compassion in dying as an organization that works with terminally ill patients to make them more aware of all their options for a peaceful death.
- Describes how the hemlock society was founded by derek humphry after helping his wife, who was dying of breast cancer, take her own life.
- Argues that euthanasia should be legal to help the terminally ill peacefully end their lives. violent and traumatizing deaths, like in the aids epidemic, are possible options for patients.
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia would allow terminally ill individuals to end their suffering; to relieve themselves from intolerable pain.
1204 words
Read More
Physician-Assisted Suicide is Illegal in 46 States
analytical essay
Envision someone lying in a hospital bed hooked up to several machines. There are doctors and nurses coming in constantly to check up on them while they are trying to get what little sleep they can through the pain, fatigue, and the slow wasting away of their body due to some sort of rare disease. On top of that they are suffering from side effects from countless drugs, constipation, delirium, and they can barely breathe. They have no appetite because they are constantly nauseated or throwing up. Their doctor has given them no chance of survival and they only have a few weeks left to live. They have said their goodbyes and they have come to terms with dying. They are prepared to meet their assumed maker. Now if someone had the chance to choose how their life ended would they take advantage of it? In March of 1998, a woman suffering with cancer did. She became the first person known to die under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of Oregon when she took a lethal dose of drugs. This law does not include people who are on a life support system and it also does not include those who have not voluntarily asked physicians to help them commit suicide. Many people worry that legalizing doctor assisted suicide appears irrational and violates the life-saving tradition of medicine and people argue that the reason why some terminally ill patients yearn to commit suicide is nothing more than depression. Physician-Assisted Suicide would lessen the human life or end the suffering and pain of those on the verge of dying; Physician-Assisted Suicide needs to be figured out for those in dire need of it or for those fighting against it. Physician-Assisted Suicide is currently illegal in 46 states; however it is legal in Vermont, Washi...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how a woman suffering from cancer died under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of oregon.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide should be a matter of free will and not just governmental assigned law.
- Explains that physician-assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life.
- Analyzes how a woman suffering from cancer died under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of oregon.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide should be a matter of free will and not just governmental assigned law.
- Explains that physician-assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life.
- Explains that assisted suicide is sometimes mistaken for euthanasia, where assisted suicide is a deliberate action done with the intention to quicken or cause the death of an individual.
- Opines that patients should be able to die with the right qualifications. physician-assisted suicide helps the terminally ill exercise their fundamental freedoms.
- Explains that many people don't believe in the act of physician-assisted suicide. they believe that it might lead to involuntary euthanasia, which violates the doctor's hippocratic oath.
- Opines that physician-assisted suicide is a beneficial option for the terminally ill, since it relieves the suffering of dying patients.
- Argues that making physician-assisted suicide legal for those in terrible suffering can help the ill patients and the family and friends surrounding them in support.
- Explains that watching a family member deteriorate can cause many people to help out as much as they can. physician-assisted suicide becoming legalized would grant that “sword” to the terminally ill patient.
1990 words
Read More
Death with Dignity
analytical essay
Imagine being told you only had so long to live and that you wouldn’t be able to do anything for yourself due to the amount of pain you're in. Imagine all of your family remembering you as weak and sick instead of how you lived the rest of your life, now imagine you can do something about that. This is the choice so many people in Oregon are glad to have, the choice to end their life with doctor assisted suicide when faced with a terminal illness. Steve Mason received assisted suicide after being told he only had six months to live, he says he wanted control over his death as much as his life, he will choose when and where it happens he says "I lived my life with dignity, I want to go out the same way." Assisted suicide is when a doctor prescribes a lethal prescription knowing that the patient plans to use them to commit suicide, this does not include refusing a ventilator or other life saving measures. Everyone should have a right to control their own life, so with certain provisions i believe everyone should be given the right to doctor assisted suicide when they face a disease that will be terminal guaranteeing they have no pain, and can choose where and when they pass.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that everyone should be given the right to doctor assisted suicide when faced with a terminal illness.
- Explains that oregon's death with dignity act allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill patients with less than six months to live.
- Opines that other states should adopt laws like this one giving people the choice to end their life when faced with all the hardships that come with being terminally ill.
- Opines that everyone should be given the right to doctor assisted suicide when faced with a terminal illness.
- Explains that oregon's death with dignity act allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill patients with less than six months to live.
- Opines that other states should adopt laws like this one giving people the choice to end their life when faced with all the hardships that come with being terminally ill.
- Argues that the critics of the law are worried about provisions not being enough to keep this safe alternative to dying a painful death.
- Argues that there is no factual support for people being pushed to use doctor assisted suicide as an easy way out.
- Analyzes oregon right to life's article, "assisted suicide in oregon does not have adequate safeguards."
- Cites smith, michael, "there is no evidence of a slippery slope with right-to-die laws." the right to die. greenhaven press, 2006.
770 words
Read More
How to Die With Dignity
explanatory essay
Although it is a huge debate in the United States, many other countries around the world have made euthanasia legal. In figure 1, you can see some examples of this fact. But assisted suicide has been given a bad rap because people don’t understand it. Granted, some unions may have taken it a step too far. Take Belgium, for example. It is now legal for doctors to euthanize infants (Anderson). Some other places have made it too easy to take your own life. As one woman put it, patients were sharing the same elevator as the patients that had come for an earlier appointment (Anderson). But while some shout against the horrors of planned death, responsible adults are waiting out there for their chance to take control over their own life and how to end it. Assisted suicide is the action of taking a person’s life using a method that a certified physician has agreed to. Euthanasia is not wrong or unjust because it is every person’s own right to decide if they want the choice to pick the day when they die or not. When lawmakers made it okay to commit suicide, they used certain precautions so that no one is pushed into the wrong decision for them. These precautions include making sure that the patient requests suicide and fills out the necessary paperwork to act on their decision, only certified doctors are allowed to give out the prescriptions for the lethal drugs, and that the patient has to be given a diagnosis that will end in death (Prescription for Suicide).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that assisted suicide has been given a bad rap because people don't understand it. it is not wrong or unjust because it is every person's right to choose the day when they die or not.
- Explains that wim diestelman is a trained professional who assists dying patients and the loved ones they leave behind. the loss of mobility and independence is one of the most influential reasons why people decide to commit suicide.
- Explains that patients have to come up with the idea of euthanasia on their own, even though doctors administer the drugs to the patients; they do not and cannot legally suggest assisted suicide.
- Explains that assisted suicide has been given a bad rap because people don't understand it. it is not wrong or unjust because it is every person's right to choose the day when they die or not.
- Explains that wim diestelman is a trained professional who assists dying patients and the loved ones they leave behind. the loss of mobility and independence is one of the most influential reasons why people decide to commit suicide.
- Explains that patients have to come up with the idea of euthanasia on their own, even though doctors administer the drugs to the patients; they do not and cannot legally suggest assisted suicide.
- Explains that only trained professionals give out prescriptions for lethal drugs, and that a long-standing professional doctor-patient relationship must exist before the option of suicide is discussed.
- Explains that suicide is serious, and there's no going back. suicide hotlines are helpful for people who are depressed or grieving, but a person or counselor can take away the suffering that some people "decide" to bear.
- Opines that everyone has the right to decide if they want to die or not. one person may say that euthanasia is right for them, and that decision is only affecting themselves and their family and friends.
1073 words
Read More
Pros And Cons Of Physician-Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia
argumentative essay
In the past couple of years, the debate regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia has become a major ethical issue in medical practice as well as an issue that involves the law and public policy. By definition, physician-assisted suicide is when a physician provides the necessary means (equipment or medication), or informs the patient of the most efficacious use of already available means, for the purpose of assisting the patient in ending his or her life.1-2 Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, in a relatively painless method.3 It is important to note that with PAS, the physician does not directly administer the medication to end life, instead they provide the medication and the patient performs the act themselves while in euthanasia another individual administers the medication regardless of patient consent or awareness.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the debate regarding pas centers on the ethical dilemma between an individual’s right to autonomy and the physicians deontological role as a healer and their responsibility to honor the intrinsic value of life.
- Explains that pas negates the intrinsic value of human life and goes against the moral principle condemning the taking of another life except in self defense.
- Explains that the debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has become a major ethical issue in medical practice.
- Explains that the debate regarding pas centers on the ethical dilemma between an individual’s right to autonomy and the physicians deontological role as a healer and their responsibility to honor the intrinsic value of life.
- Explains that pas negates the intrinsic value of human life and goes against the moral principle condemning the taking of another life except in self defense.
- Explains that the debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has become a major ethical issue in medical practice.
- Explains the strengths of arguments opposing pas, including the responsibility of physicians to abide by ethical guidelines of nonmaleficence, the intrinsic value of life, and the dangers to public policy.
- Argues that the role of the physician is to promote life and to do no harm, but it is also their responsibility to be a healer and relieve suffering.
- Concludes that the issue of physician-assisted suicide involves a conflict between equally important moral and ethical imperatives.
1681 words
Read More
The Death With Dignity Act
explanatory essay
Oftentimes when one hears the term Physician Assisted Suicide (hereafter PAS) the words cruel and unethical come to mind. On October 27, 1997 Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act, this act would allow terminally ill Oregon residents to end their lives through a voluntary self-administered dose of lethal medications that are prescribed by a physician (Death with Dignity Act) . This has become a vital, medical and social movement. Having a choice should mean that a terminally ill patient is entitled to the choice to pursue PAS. If people have the right to refuse lifesaving treatments, such as chemo and palliative care, then the choice of ending life with PAS should be a choice that is allowed.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the patient must make two oral requests to their physician, separated within at least fifteen days.
- Explains that the patient must provide a written request to their physician, signed in the presence of two witnesses.
- Opines that if either physician believes the patient's judgment is impaired by a psychiatric or psychological disorder, he or she must be referred for psychological evaluation.
- Explains that the patient must make two oral requests to their physician, separated within at least fifteen days.
- Explains that the patient must provide a written request to their physician, signed in the presence of two witnesses.
- Opines that if either physician believes the patient's judgment is impaired by a psychiatric or psychological disorder, he or she must be referred for psychological evaluation.
- Opines that the prescribing physician must inform the patient of feasible alternatives to assisted suicide, including comfort care, hospice care and pain control.
- Explains that catholics believe that the dignity of each human person must insist on "killing the pain. not the patient." the journal of the american medical association reported sixty-eight percent of patients receiving painkilling drugs lived longer than those who did not receive drugs.
- States that oregon was the first state to legalize physician assisted suicide for terminally ill, mentally able adults.
- Explains that many oppose the choice of pas because it is an ethical and moral dilemma that involves not only one person, but all of those who are in relation to the patient.
- Explains that many on the opposing side of comfort care believe that a patient who is on high dose narcotics will eventually build up tolerance to the drug and resistance to side effects.
1734 words
Read More
Ethical Issues With Physician Assisted Suicide
explanatory essay
The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are both emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death. If you take a moment and imagine how you would choose to live your last day, it is almost guaranteed that it wouldn’t be a day spent lying in a hospital bed, suffering in pain, continuously being pumped with medicine, and living in a strangers’ body. Today we live in a culture that denies the terminally ill the right to maintain control over when and how to end their lives. Physicians-assisted suicide “is the voluntary termination of one's own life by the administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Medical Definition of Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2017). Physician-assisted
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death.
- Explains that life-sustaining procedures such as ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments for infectious and terminal diseases have positively influenced modern medicine, but inadvertently cause terminal patients extensive pain and suffering.
- Explains that the discussion of physician-assisted suicide is often focused around the ethical implications. the patient has given consent to the physician to ethically aid in their death.
- Explains that the ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death.
- Explains that life-sustaining procedures such as ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments for infectious and terminal diseases have positively influenced modern medicine, but inadvertently cause terminal patients extensive pain and suffering.
- Explains that the discussion of physician-assisted suicide is often focused around the ethical implications. the patient has given consent to the physician to ethically aid in their death.
- Explains that euthanasia is divided into two separate classifications, namely passive and active. active and physician-assisted suicide share many of the same characteristics but differ in the role for committing the final act.
- Explains that physician-assisted suicide is legalized in six out of the fifty states in america, but there are additional states that have death with dignity laws.
824 words
Read More
Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
opinion essay
Everyone at some point in their life will have to deal with a tragic death. Either the death of a family member like a mother or father, or a best friend. It is easy say how you will feel once it happens, but what if you had to be the one to make the decision? Could you be the one held responsible to keep someone you love alive longer then they originally intended?. Many stories have turned into a media frenzy with the assisted suicide by Dr. Jack Kevorkian to help 54 yr. old Janet Adkins end her suffering from Alzheimer’s, to Terry Shiavo who suffered from extreme hypokalemia and her lifeless body was torn between her husband wanted to pull the plug to let her die a painless death to her family who wanted to keep her artificially kept alive.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide should be legal due to the fact that so many people suffer yearly from terminal illnesses.
- Explains dr. kevorkian's assisted suicides. he assisted terminally ill patients 130 times with his machine called "thanatron" or simply the death machine.
- Analyzes how the terri schiavo case graced the world with its lurid face. she had a heart attack from suffering from hypokalemia from personal dieting.
- Opines that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide should be legal due to the fact that so many people suffer yearly from terminal illnesses.
- Explains dr. kevorkian's assisted suicides. he assisted terminally ill patients 130 times with his machine called "thanatron" or simply the death machine.
- Analyzes how the terri schiavo case graced the world with its lurid face. she had a heart attack from suffering from hypokalemia from personal dieting.
- Explains that euthanasia was a last resort effort, and oregon became the first state to legalize assisted suicide in 1994.
- Opines that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide should be legal due to the fact that so many people suffer yearly from terminal illnesses and they should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death.
844 words
Read More
Persuasive Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide
analytical essay
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing competent patients with a prescription for medication to use with the primary intention of ending their own life.
- Explains that assisted suicide has been a debate for many years, and is still heavily going.
- Explains that aids is a severe loss of the body's cellular immunity, greatly lowering the resistance to infection and malignancy.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing competent patients with a prescription for medication to use with the primary intention of ending their own life.
- Explains that assisted suicide has been a debate for many years, and is still heavily going.
- Explains that aids is a severe loss of the body's cellular immunity, greatly lowering the resistance to infection and malignancy.
- Explains that assisted suicide can relieve the patient and stop them from suffering. if a patient is terminally ill and will not get better, it allows them to end all of it. the patient deserves to choose whether they want to keep fighting or if they cannot go further.
- Explains that 70% of the 676 physicians who responded to a survey agreed that terminally ill patients should be able to ask for active euthanasia and 45% said they would assist if it was legal.
- Explains that assisted suicide gives the patient peace of mind of being able to end their life when they are ready.
- Argues that assisted suicide is not humane, but it is the patient's choice to do it.
- Argues that assisted suicide is a grave violation of the law of god, since it's the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of human life.
- Argues that physician assisted suicide helps end suffering and gives peace of mind even though many argue it's not humane. dying is not a crime.
1888 words
Read More
Medical Ethics
analytical essay
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
776 words
Read More
Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
analytical essay
Patrick Mathew, 43, had Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS) where he could not move any part of his body. His son said that his dad struggled for seven months before he made the decision to end his life with lethal prescription which he did on march 10, 1999 (WRTL.ORG). Just like Patrick Mathew, more and more people are taking a lethal dose of prescription medication to end their lives (Barone,1). More than 750 people in Oregon ingested a lethal dose of prescription medication since the death with dignity act went into effect in 1997 (Barone,1). People who are taking the prescription are the ones who have no chance of survival, or are in severe pain decided they are not able to handle it anymore and decide to end their life (Barone,1). The Netherlands became the very first country to legalise euthanasia and assisted suicide (The guardian, 2). To be able to have an assisted suicide the Netherlands imposed a strict set of conditions before being able to have that option by stating that the patient must be
In this essay, the author
- Explains that patrick mathew, 43, had lou gehrig's disease (als) where he couldn't move any part of his body. more and more people are taking a lethal dose of prescription medication to end their lives.
- Explains that riggs, a former patient suffering from aggressive uterine cancer, agrees that patients should have the right to an assisted suicide.
- Analyzes how riggs' point of view is that she knows how people with incurable illnesses feel about assisted suicide and how it could be beneficial to someone like them.
- Explains that patrick mathew, 43, had lou gehrig's disease (als) where he couldn't move any part of his body. more and more people are taking a lethal dose of prescription medication to end their lives.
- Explains that riggs, a former patient suffering from aggressive uterine cancer, agrees that patients should have the right to an assisted suicide.
- Analyzes how riggs' point of view is that she knows how people with incurable illnesses feel about assisted suicide and how it could be beneficial to someone like them.
- Compares the views of belgium and germany on assisted suicide, noting they believe people have the right to end their lives when they are suffering or have incurable illness.
- Analyzes how bartunek's argument includes both sides of people’s perspectives. he shows how some people don't support terminally ill children having a choice to make the decision to have an assisted suicide.
- Explains that the article was dated back to 2009 so mexico might have changed their opinion on this topic. he was biased because he only showed the people that didn't support assisted suicide.
1885 words
Read More
Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
analytical essay
How would you feel if this was your mother or any loved one? Euthanasia or assisted suicide for terminally ill patients should be legal."Supporters of the right to die movement argue that the courts have found just as there is a constitutional right to refuse medical treatment, that there is a constitutional right to ask for medical assistance in dying"(text 2). People should have the choice of Euthanasia or assisted suicide if they are terminally ill. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legal in all fifty states because people deserve the right to die with dignity and free from pain and suffering.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that euthanasia or assisted suicide for terminally ill patients should be legal because people deserve the right to die with dignity and free from pain and suffering.
- Opines that terminally ill patients should have the right to decide if euthanasia or physician-aided suicide is what they want.
- Opines that the government shouldn't be able to take that right away from terminally ill patients.
- Argues that euthanasia or assisted suicide for terminally ill patients should be legal because people deserve the right to die with dignity and free from pain and suffering.
- Opines that terminally ill patients should have the right to decide if euthanasia or physician-aided suicide is what they want.
- Opines that the government shouldn't be able to take that right away from terminally ill patients.
- Analyzes how the article "the danger of suicide contagion and why assisted suicide makes it worse" argues that euthanasia will make non-assisted suicides more likely.
569 words
Read More