Life is essentially a constant victory over death. Although this feat seems ideal, there is a category of society that wishes to lose. Some of these people turn to assisted suicide in order to fulfill their ultimate desires. Oregon, Washington, and Vermont are currently the only states that allow this act to be carried out. Commonly assumed to be synonymous to euthanasia, the most palpable difference between to two is who performs the task. In euthanasia, a physician will administer a lethal dosage of medicine, while assisted suicide is characterized by the patient administering it to him or herself. As the issue of legalization gains more momentum, a general argument has formed for the most popular opinions. Supporters believe in “death with dignity,” while the opposing side views assisted suicide as the gateway to physicians killing their patients. Being the first state to legalize assisted suicide, what views did Oregon consider when making the decision?
The beginning of physician-assisted death is attributed to Dr. Jack Kevorkian. He practiced euthanasia, which eventually led to assisted suicide. The idea that terminally ill patients in pain could choose when to end their life was appealing to many, especially those whose friends or family suffered from debilitating illnesses. Over time, more countries and states have legalized assisted suicide and are continually refining the qualifications a person must meet for eligibility. The Death with Dignity Act in Oregon was passed by the slimmest of margins- 51% to 49%- in 1994; however, a measure that would have repealed the law was defeated by a vote of 60% to 40% in 1997 (Norman-Eady). The OLR Research Report outlines two sets of requirements patients must meet in order to reques...
... middle of paper ...
... Affairs and “Physicians’ Experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act” are more valid than How to Die in Oregon for two primary reasons. The authors are credible in the sense that the council and researchers are well educated and know the medical field. Also, the lack of emotional appeal indicates there is less bias in their reports. With How to Die in Oregon, Peter Richardson’s techniques were effective, but rely heavily on the audience having an emotional response to the film. In the future, more research on Washington and Vermont’s experience with assisted suicide will be available, so the effects of its legalization will be easier to detect. Vermont’s location to Oregon relative to Washington’s will also show any regional differences, should there be any. The procedure is carried out using barbiturates, but perhaps more effective methods could be looked i
In this essay, the author
- Explains that oregon, washington, and vermont are the only states that allow assisted suicide.
- Explains that dr. jack kevorkian practiced euthanasia, which eventually led to assisted suicide. the death with dignity act in oregon was passed by the slimmest of margins in 1994; a measure that would have repealed the law was defeated in 1997.
- Analyzes how the film how to die in oregon, directed by peter richardson, made its first appearance at the 27th sundance film festival.
- Analyzes how richardson's film reflects on his understanding of the impact death has upon people and how to evoke such emotions within a person.
- Analyzes how the council on ethical and judicial affairs views assisted suicide as an inappropriate extension of the right to refuse treatment.
- Argues that the council on ethical and judicial affairs is a nationally recognized group that should always appear experienced and qualified.
- Explains the article's tone parallels that of the ceja report, "physician-assisted suicide." although the death with dignity act was passed, oregonians have the power to repeal it should they feel the act is being abused.
- Opines that the articles "physician-assisted suicide" by the council on ethical and judicial affairs are more valid than how to die in oregon for two primary reasons.
Related
- analytical
- opinion
- explanatory
- Assisted Suicide: Murder or Mercy?analytical essayAssisted Suicide: Murder or Mercy? Physician assisted suicide is becoming a larger issue in our society. More people are learning about it, and that is creating more controversy. Oregon passed their Death with Dignity Act on November 8, 1994.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that 'regular' suicide is not illegal, but involves the person himself, so no one can punish them for it. dr. jack kevorkian was a strong proponent of assisted suicide.
- Argues that assisted suicide will lead to euthanasia, which is a common legal solution for those with mental illness, permanent disability, and old age.
- Explains that less than 4 percent of people who request assisted suicide go on to achieve it within the next five years. depression can impair judgment and decision-making skills.
- Explains that the nightingale alliance says that 95% of pain can be controlled, and the other 5%, reduced to a tolerable level.
- Argues that doctors, insurance companies, or even family members may try and push others into the decision. seeing a loved one suffer is difficult.
- Argues that doctor shopping is becoming a huge problem and that some of the safety laws that are in place are being bypassed.
- Argues that people deserve to die with dignity, which is why oregon's law is the death with dignity act.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is becoming a larger issue in our society, and that is creating more controversy.
- Argues that by not legalizing assisted suicide, we are being inhumane and causing people to die alone.
- Analyzes the controversy surrounding the legalization of assisted suicide.
2039 wordsRead More - Physician Assisted Suicideanalytical essayAssisted Suicide Physician assisted suicide, also known as right to die has become a hot button issue within the last twenty years. The reason behind the interest is because in the “land of the free” known as America, that promotes independence and personal rights; it seems quite regressive to many to deny a person their right to die. After the 1997 Supreme Court decision which declined to nationally recognize assisted suicide, Chief Justice William Rehquist stated this issue best when he said we are “engaged in an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality and practicality of physician assisted suicide as it should in a democratic society”(Karim Paragraph 10). Cut to 2014 and over ten years later this issue has gained more momentum than ever, specifically in California after the California Compassionate Choices Act following the passing and implementation of The Dignity Act in Oregon (Tucker 1611). The benefits of assisted suicide include an end in suffering for patients while saving their family from future debt and allowing their organs and the energy used to keep them alive to save others who can live a complete and healthy life.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that physician assisted suicide, also known as right to die, has become a hot button issue within the last twenty years.
- Argues that physician assisted suicide prevents pain and suffering surrounding the final months and days of a person's life by their choice alone.
- Explains that autonomy is synonymous with independence and is often brought up as a major pro for assisted suicide because terminally ill want to keep their autonomy and not depend on anyone in their final days.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is irrational and selfish to some, but benefits include preventing family from accruing future debt. california could prevent debt and misery surrounding dying people by adopting the death with dignity act.
- Opines that prolonging a life when the outcome is death is not the state's business. doctors' main goal is to save lives, but some patients may be able to donate viable organs and help others.
- Argues that physician assisted suicide is morally wrong and should not be further implemented in our country for that reason alone.
- Cites alstyne, william van, dahl, e., and n. levy. "the case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?"
- Analyzes karaim, reed, steinbock, b., tucker, kathryn, and tucker.
1112 wordsRead More - Pro Assisted Suicideanalytical essayDespite the changes in modern medicine, the attitudes toward assisted suicide in America’s courts and legislatures have not altered considerably. For instance, in June 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that people do not have a constitutional right to assisted suicide. Although a constitutional right was not established, the ruling did not preclude states from passing laws prohibiting or permitting assisted suicide. However, similar to its status 130 years ago, assisted suicide is not widely supported in America’s state legislatures. As of 1997, physician-assisted suicide was legal in only one state—Oregon. Moreover, that law faced challenges from right-to-life opponents and the Justice Department, which w...
In this essay, the author
- Argues that assisted suicide should be allowed everywhere because everyone should have the right to choose how to live and die.
- Explains that the attitudes toward assisted suicide in america's courts and legislatures have not changed significantly.
- Explains that oregon is the only state that has legalized assisted suicide. the statute states that two separate doctors must agree that the patient is mentally competent and the decision was voluntary.
- Explains the principle of self-determination to control the time, place, and nature of one's death and the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process.
- Explains that the ethics of physician assisted suicide (pas) continues to be debated, arguing that pas may be a rational choice for escaping unbearable suffering.
- Argues that even when choices are socially shaped, they should be respected as independent as long as there is appropriate evaluation of decisional capacity on the person who is deciding whether or not they want to live.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is generally recognized as illegal in association with the definition of homicide. supporters against active suicide feel that it is the duty of physicians to help and heal patients rather than aiding their exit from this world.
- Explains that euthanasia activists claim that laws against a person's death are government mandated suffering, whereas supporters believe that legislation against it violates fundamental concepts of liberty, freedom of choice, and self-determination.
- Opines that assisted suicide should be allowed everywhere because everyone should have the right to choose how to live and die.
1418 wordsRead More - Downfalls of Assisted Suicideanalytical essayAlthough Dr. Jack Kevorkian was ultimately incarcerated for murder, his practices of euthanasia sparked interest in the idea of physician-assisted death. The general consensus of the public was his actions were malpractice due to the possibility of his patients not actually wanting to die. Assisted suicide arose from the remnant of Dr. Kevorkian’s infamy. In 1994, Oregon passed a law called Death with Dignity, which legalized assisted suicide. Although many people found the law to be a social breakthrough, the implications that have arisen exemplify how assisted suicide is too complex to be legalized.
In this essay, the author
- Explains dr. jack kevorkian's practice of euthanasia sparked interest in physician-assisted death. oregon passed a law called death with dignity, which legalized assisted suicide.
- Argues that death with dignity is a misnomer and should be discouraged in society. the main argument supporters use to justify assisted suicide is that patients are in an unbearable amount of pain.
- Explains that the hippocratic oath prohibits assisted suicide, but it is manipulated and rewritten to be more relevant. the basic role of physicians is to better the lives of their patients through extending their life and prolonging death.
- Analyzes how the death with dignity act is showing its flaws, even though it is relatively new. the prescription cannot be made more attainable due to how easily it can be abused.
- Opines that the legalization of assisted suicide has raised ethical issues. the shameless killing will create an inevitable slippery slope, in which other crimes will be legalized.
680 wordsRead More - Essay On Assisted Suicideanalytical essayCurrently, physician-assisted suicide or death is illegal in all states except Oregon, Vermont, Montana and Washington. Present law in other states express that suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that the moral right to life should encompass the right to voluntary death. Opponents of assisted suicide claim that society has a moral and civic duty to preserve the lives of innocent persons. There is a slippery slope involving the legalizing assisted suicide. Concern that assisted suicide allowed on the basis of mercy or compassion, can and will lead to the urging of the death for morally unjustifiable reasons is understandable. However, legalization can serve to prevent the already existent practice of underground physician-assisted suicide if strict laws to ensure that the interests of the patients are primary are installed and enforced. When a patient asks for assistance in dying, their wishes should be respected as long as the patient is free from coercion and competent enough to give informed consent. The intent of this work is to examine the legalization of assisted suicide in Oregon and the Netherlands and to argue that assisted suicide is morally and ethically acceptable in theory despite some unintended consequences of its implementation.
In this essay, the author
- Examines the legalization of physician-assisted suicide in oregon and the netherlands and argues that assisted suicide is morally and ethically acceptable in theory despite some unintended consequences.
- States that the oregon death with dignity act allows oregon residents the access to physician-assisted death with restrictions. the patient must be at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with a terminal illness, and be in the right psychological state to make informed, rational decisions.
- Opines that the oregon division of health must expand their infrastructure to accommodate the death with dignity act.
- Explains that the death with dignity act is a catalyst into improving end-of-life care in general among oregon medical practitioners.
- Compares the situation of assisted suicide in the netherlands with oregon's, stating that terminal illness is not a requirement.
- Argues that the dutch government's failure to enforce its own law causes the exploitation of patients by private organizations.
- Explains that four themes consistently appear in arguments against legalization: the belief in the sanctity of life dictates that death can only happen naturally; the third theme is concerned with the powers allocated to patients and physicians.
- Argues that the slippery slope theory portrays only a possible picture; it does not necessarily portray the likely picture.
- Explains that those against the legalization of assisted suicide fear that it would lead to a greater risk for potential mistakes and physician abuses of power.
- Analyzes how the new england journal of medicine studied the effects of legalization in oregon between 1997 and 1999 and found that the abuse claims made by opponents are not supported.
- Analyzes how the study disproves the sentiment that physicians abuse power by presenting assisted death as a primary option.
- Argues that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide is unnecessary if proper palliative care is available. opponents of assisted death fail to consider that eradication of physical pain does not necessarily eliminate suffering.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide is an appropriate policy that allows for patient autonomy. propaganda portraying physicians as corrupt is misleading and simply erroneous.
- Argues that it is paternalistic to prevent legalization out of fear that individuals cannot make rational decisions. the oregon death with dignity act is reasonably successful in protecting both human life and autonomy.
2917 wordsRead More - Physician Aid-in-Dying (PAD): The Right to Chooseopinion essaySloss, David. "The Right to Choose How to Die: A Constitutional Analysis of State Laws Prohibiting Physician-Assisted Suicide." Stanford Law Review. 48.4 (1996): 937-973. Web. 2 March 2015.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the controversial act known as physician aid-in-dying challenges us to question our ethical, religious, and cultural values or beliefs.
- States that oregon passed the death with dignity act in 1994. the law requires the collection of data from patients and physicians and publishes it in an annual report.
- Opines that pad is a respectful solution for terminally ill patients who wish to choose their own timing and manner in which they die.
- Explains that pad is not the same as euthanasia, since it involves prescribed medicines used to purposely end a patient's life.
- Explains that assisted suicide is used every day by the patient creating a living will with particular instructions regarding their medical treatments.
- Compares dr. jack kevorkian's euthanasia procedures on terminally ill patients to what pad physicians are doing today.
- Explains that the medical and pharmaceutical systems are flawed and prescription medications are abused daily in the united states, but patients must follow the strict guidelines set forth by the state of oregon.
- Opines that pad is an opportunity to stimulate open discussions with our doctors about end-of-life care and what our potential options are.
- Summarizes braddock, clarence, and mark tonelli's "physician aid-in-dying: ethical topic in medicine."
- Explains campbell, courtney, "aid-in-dying and the taking of human life." journal of medical ethics.
- Analyzes sloss, david, "the right to choose how to die: a constitutional analysis of state laws prohibiting physician-assisted suicide." stanford law review.
1783 wordsRead More - Physician Assisted Suicide ( Pas )explanatory essayImagine, if you will, that you have just found out you have a terminal medical condition. Doesn’t matter which one, it’s terminal. Over the 6 months you have to live you experience unmeasurable amounts of pain, and when your free of your pain the medication you’re under renders you in an impaired sense of consciousness. Towards the 4th month, you begin to believe all this suffering is pointless, you are to die anyways, why not with a little dignity. You begin to consider Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS). In this essay I will explain the ethical decisions and dilemmas one may face when deciding to accept the idea of Physician-Assisted Suicide. I will also provide factual information pertaining to the subject of PAS and testimony from some that advocate for legalization of PAS. PAS is not to be taken lightly. It is the decision to end one’s life with the aid of a medical physician. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary states that PAS is “Suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient’s intent.” PAS is considered, by our textbook – Doing Ethics by Lewis Vaughn, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. There are other forms of euthanasia such as non-voluntary, involuntary, and passive. This essay is focusing on PAS, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. PAS is commonly known as “Dying/Death with Dignity.” The most recent publicized case of PAS is the case of Brittany Maynard. She was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer in California, where she lived. At the time California didn’t have Legislative right to allow Brittany the right to commit PAS so she was transported to Oregon where PAS is legal....
In this essay, the author
- Explains the ethical dilemmas one may face when deciding to accept the idea of physician-assisted suicide (pas).
- Explains brittany's decision to commit pas was for the greater good of her and her loved ones. the ethical theory is ethical egoism, which states that the right action is the one that advances one’s own interests.
- Explains that harold glucksberg is an assistant professor of medicine at the university of washington school of medicine and practices oncology at pacific medical center.
- Explains that in california, an individual seeking to obtain a prescription for an aid-in-dying drug, must submit two oral requests, 15 days apart, and written requests to his or her attending physician.
859 wordsRead More - The Right to Physician Assisted Suicideanalytical essayThe right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the united states.
- Opines that medical technology is science's greatest gift to mankind, but for the terminally ill, it is just a means of prolonging suffering.
- Explains that medical technology has failed to save a loved-one, but the cost is sometimes too much for the terminally ill's family.
- Opines that terminally ill patients should be allowed to die with dignity. choosing the right to assisted suicide would be a final exercise of autonomy for the dying.
- Argues that the hippocratic oath cannot be used to deny the right to assisted suicide.
- Argues that the doctor-patient relationship would encourage distrust if assisted suicide was legalized.
- Explains that stephen reinhardt's ruling is the strongest defense for the right to assisted suicide.
- Opines that the right to assisted suicide must be freely bestowed upon terminally ill people. this would allow them to leave with dignity, save their families from financial ruin, and relieve them of insufferable pain.
- Explains cotton, paul, "medicine's position is both pivotal and precarious in assisted suicide debate." the journal of the american association.
- Analyzes smith, cheryl, "should active euthanasia be legalized: yes." american bar association journal april 1993.
1874 wordsRead More - The Right to Dieanalytical essay...otected by law. Opponents to legalization who preach on the “sanctity of life” make a fundamental mistake: it is not mere quantity of life that matters, but its quality; and since dying is a living act, the quality of experience at the end of life, or in conditions of incurable distress, is the overriding consideration. To believe that mere length of existence, however unbearable and painful, trumps the kindness of granting someone's request for help to end their suffering easily and quickly, is to have one's priorities utterly wrong. Others warn of the “slippery slope” of legalization and the possible abuse of physician-assisted suicide. However, abuse is possible in all walks of life, and a carefully drafted law would provide the necessary fail-safes, protections and checks while a allowing those in unbearable distress the sanctuary of an easeful end to suffering.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that assisted suicide is based on the belief that individuals should be allowed access to medical assistance to end their lives voluntarily, when and how they choose.
- Argues that legalization of physician-assisted suicide could reduce the instances of suicide by other means.
- Argues that legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia could result in serious consequences.
- States that four states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, including oregon, vermont, and washington.
- Explains that patients who take advantage of the death with dignity law use the drug pentobarbital, a barbiturate, that is dissolved in liquid or semi-liquid.
- Argues that assisted suicide should be legalized as an individual's right to choose the time and circumstances of his or her death.
1493 wordsRead More - Physician Assisted Suicideexplanatory essayThe practice of assisted suicide is not a modern phenomenon. In ancient Greece, the government gave hemlock to those who wanted it. William Shakespeare memorialized the Roman practice in Julius Caesar by depicting Brutus running into the sword held by Strato (Egendorf). While physician assisted suicide is not a new concept the moral debate surrounding euthanasia in America has certainly been brought to the forefront in the last thirty years with the advancements of modern medicine. The direct effects of such a rapid increase in medical science is the prolonging of a human's life span. However, some may wonder if living to be 80 or 90 years old is a blessing or a curse?
In this essay, the author
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is not a new concept, but the moral debate surrounding euthanasia in america has been brought to the forefront with the advancements of modern medicine.
- Explains that the longer people live the more likely they are to develop an incurable health condition, some of which are painful and/or could eventually lead to death.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide in the united states is legal only in montana, oregon, and washington state. passive euthanasia is the intentional withholding of life saving drugs, treatments or devices, resulting in death of the afflicted.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide contradicts the hippocratic oath, which states that a medical practitioner must not play at god.
- Opines that the supporters of medically supervised suicide, may feel it is a doctor's obligation to assist patients dying in monitored environments. others may believe that as an american citizen they have certain inalienable rights.
- Explains that the debate over legalizing physician assisted suicide is not only taking place in the united states.
- Describes dr. jack kevorkian, a michigan pathologist who assisted in the deaths of over 100 terminally ill patients.
- Cites egendorf, laura k., humphry, derek, and humry. "assisted suicide essays and articles at enotes."
- Cites kevorkian's famous quotes at brainyquote and morrow, rn, angela. physician assisted suicide - reasons for seeking physician
967 wordsRead More