Introduction
For a business to improve and meet the expected results it should be well organized. In order to totally outdo rivals in a business there is need to come up with solid competencies and competitive methods in a very superior and tactic fashion which the rival companies will find hard to break through (Gamble and Thompson, 2009). Taking Sony Electronics Company, there should be a good organization pattern in the company so as to achieve high production with encouraging outputs. The main objective of the Sony Company is to express freedom to the employees and assist them in achieving their potential through good work motivation. This is the idea that Sony Company has put in place in order to defeat its competitors like; Panasonic, Microsoft, Samsung and LG. The paper focuses on the methods that Sony Company has put in place for the purpose of getting a good business organization to achieve the expected goals.
Execution-related aspects of organizing the Sony Electronic Company
In the process of executing a good organization strategy, there is need to have some rules which should be analyzed so as to effectively come up with the expected plan. The first thing is to look behind and examine the previous organization program and identify the loop holes which should be filled with the current chart. The Sony Electronic Company is divided into various product groups namely: video equipment, audio equipment, television, among others. Since each of these groups also produces many other products which make it difficult for the whole enterprise to manage, each group is registered as a sole company with its own organization structure (Sharma, 1995).
Division of Labor
The company has created an eight-company structure wh...
... middle of paper ...
...t for the success of very business or organization, good management, proper division of labor, and a good working conditions are the key factors (Kapoor ,Pride, and Hughes). This has clearly been demonstrated through the success achieved out of the effective and efficient organization structure at Sony.
Reference List
Gamble & Thompson, (2009). Essentials of Strategic Management, Retrieved from:
http://www.seca.net/2010%20-%20Essentials%20of%20Strategic%20Management.pdf
Gupta, V. & Prashanth, K. (2005). Restructuring Sony, Case Teaching Notes © Pearson
Education Limited 2005.
Kapoor, J. R., Pride W.M. $ Hughes, R.J. (2009). Business, South Western Cengage Learning.
Sharma, S. (1995). Organizational Design, Faculty of Information Studies, University of
Toronto. Retrieved from:
http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/fis/courses/lis1230/lis1230sharma/od1.htm
The Organisation structure of a company addresses the fact that every organisation has specific units that are responsible for different roles and actions in the organisation and that no department within the organisation stands alone, they are intertwined. The organisational chart or structure should be designed to divide up the work load, responsibilities and roles to be done
Organizations are initially structured around tasks, and as the organization continues to grow, the structure within the organization takes on many characteristics. Not all structures are advantageous, especially if they are lacking in some areas. There is a relationship between structure and size of the organization that affect the centralization of the organization. At the highest levels, the personality of the chief executive may amend the organizations' structure. The structure within an organization helps define the roles and responsibilities among the members from each department and work group. The four general types of organization structure are functional, divisional, matrix, and project based. “Organizational structure is the skeleton of an organization” (Feigenbaum, 2013) and how these individuals relate to each another. Structure is a statement of the current affairs, not the ideas, intentions or improvement within an organization. When business leaders develop their initial plans for an organization, he or she looks at how to design a company and takes inventory of all the tasks, functions and goals of the business. The leader then develops groupings and ordering of job positions, departments, and human resources to effectively and efficiently perform these tasks. Technology, size, environment, strategy and goals affect an organizational structure and effects, whether they are categorized as mechanistic or organic.
...anging. They rely primarily on communication, rules and regulations, and equality/fairness. Without these three things an organization will be severely lacking due to the lack of employee morale and cohesion within the workplace.
The people in the company and the passion which the people have for what they were doing.
The Foodcorp is a big organization of more than twenty thousand employees. The structure should help the organization achieved established goals and objectives. Therefore, the appropriate structural design is very crucial. The performance and the efficiency of the organization can be enhanced through specialization and appropriate division of labor. Foodcorp used a matrix structure but the management style of Foodcorp seemed to be a one boss arrangement. Information and decisions directly comes from the top. As we can see from the chart, group members report and communicate primarily with president. In my opinion, this style will work best in a simple organization, but not for a big organization like Foodcorp. If it relies too much on the president, the employees might face with many problems such as delays and bad decisions. Finally, Foodcorp may suffer from its structure. In my ...
According to Hill, Wee and Udayasankar, the success of the company’s strategy can be measured by the value created for shareholders. To maximize the value, managers can increase the profitability by picking a position in the efficiency frontier with supportive internal operations and appropriate organization structure. In fact, Louis Vuitton had outstanding performance on that.
... organizational structure that needs to be maintained for its operations in Australia. As the suggestion has been of total ownership thus span of control is needed and these factors have been discussed in this report to illustrate how effective the organization can be in Australia.
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.
For a company to be successful it is important that it has very good organization. Organization can be defined in many different ways. Bateman and Snell define organizing as assembling and coordinating the human, financial, physical, informational,
Organizations can be configured in many different ways. Their overall classifications can be summarized by characteristics of complexity within the system, the level of formalization, and the centralization of decision-making power. The structure of each organization is influenced by many factors. Such factors include; the goods and services provided, the overall individuality of the staff providing the service and producing the products. The overall beliefs and values of the individuals performing the services that are being delivered, the technology that is utilized to help deliver the services and aid in product production, as well as the needs, desires, and generalized characteristics of the consumer population that requires or demand the product or service. (Yoder-Wise, 2007, p. 145) The organization will have different operating priorities based on its ownership. The main goal behind most business is to make money. The private owned institution strives to make its shareholders money, while a non-profit institution reinvests all of its revenue back into the orga...
In order for our business to be successful we had to do a number of
The world of business has undergone radical and dramatic changes in the last decade changes that present extraordinary challenges for the contemporary manager. A manager is an organizational member who is responsible for planning, organizing, leading, and controlling the activities of the organization so that the goals can be achieved. According to a widely referenced study by Henry Mintzberg, managers serve three primary roles: interpersonal, informational, and decision-making. Management is process of administrating and coordinating resources effectively and efficiently in an effort to achieve the goals of the organization.
Companies should have only enough workers to perform essential operational functions. Hire employees who are well trained and able to pro-vide results. Moreover, employees should be happy, keep them motivated. Remember that just being good at one thing doesn't mean it's enough for the business to be successful. The owner should be adept at several things such as hiring, accounting, marketing, public relations, etc. And, although initia...
Organizations are established in specific ways to obtain different objectives, and the structure of an organization can help or restrain its advance toward accomplishing these goals. Organizations of different sized and types can achieve higher sales and other profit adequately by identifying their requirements with the structure they use to operate.
This report will give us a clear perspective as to what the optimal organizational structure that suits Rendell Company plus some additional control system in attaining the company’s main objectives. We will be also tackling the roles, functions and responsibilities of a controller in an organization. This case takes us into Rendell Company which is currently having problems between the corporate controller and the divisional controller. We assessed the advantages and disadvantages of the organization structure of Martex whether it can be applied and be implemented to Rendell Company in order to resolve the problem. Through the frameworks and issues, we concluded that while current setup would cause some budgetary discrepancies because of the lack of loyalty between the divisional controllers to the corporate controller, changing the organization structure of Martex would cause a disparity between the division manager and the divisional controller thus resulting in an anxiety in their working environment which is too costly as compared to maintaining the current setup.