Critical Assessment
Innovations
The judgement of the Lawless case was the ECtHR’s first one. Since the Convention remains silent on many organisational aspects, the first hearings before the Court gave rise to many procedural questions. Ireland raised several objections regarding the procedure, which were rejected by the Court. Another aspect that was not yet regulated was the judgement style. The ECtHR adopted the French style, where the judgement is basically structured along one long sentence. This tradition has since then been replaced but still stays succinct when compared to the British tradition. Besides these rather formal innovations, there are other important aspects to consider. According to Bates, the judgement was considered to be bold at the time, even though from today’s perspective, it appears to be very technical. It was the first time that a citizen was able to take the government of a sovereign State before an international Court to defend his individual rights. This was applauded by most contemporary commentators and will be discussed in more detail below. The judgement set up the whole human rights machinery in Europe and showed that the Convention was indeed operable and more than dead letter. In addition to these assertions, the court shows his inclination to broad interpretations guided by the overall spirit of the Convention. This is illustrated by the Courts interpretation of Art. 5 ECHR where he notes that in this instance, the Irish interpretation “would lead to conclusions repugnant to the fundamental principles of the Convention.” Furthermore, the Court made it clear that it had ample powers independent of the States and the Commission, when it held that it could act on its own to assure th...
... middle of paper ...
...NG.pdf.
Lawson, Rick, and Henry Schermers. Leading Cases of the European Court of Human Rights. Nijmegen : Ars Aequi Libri, 1997.
“Locus Standi.” TheFreeDictionary.com. Accessed April 8, 2014. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/locus+standi.
Maguire, John. “Internment, the IRA and the Lawless Case in Ireland: 1957-61.” Journal of the Oxford University History Society, 2004, 1–20.
Mowbray, Alastair R. Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights. 3rd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012.
“Plea in Bar.” TheFreeDictionary.com. Accessed April 7, 2014. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plea+in+Bar.
Porter, Harold. “The Lawless Case: A Beachhead for Civil Rights.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49, no. 1 (January 1, 1963): 79–82.
“The Lawless Case.” Duke Law Journal 11, no. 2 (April 1, 1962): 249–58.
Schultz, David, and John R. Vile. The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties in America. 710-712. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Gale Virtual Reference Library, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. .
Schattuck, John. “Overview of Human Right Practices, 1995,” Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. March 1996: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 10 Oct 2013.
Parliamentary Sovereignty is one of the most significant factors of the Constitution of the United Kingdom, and makes the Parliament the most powerful legal force, who dominates themselves. It involves the legal relationship between the courts and the Parliament, and has remained a traditional value for many centuries, and its doctrine is what makes their system different from other widely held states. However, although the parliament has its strength, it also has some lack of power to control and amend those Acts of the European Union, who tend to override them; such as the European Communities Act 1972, and the Human Rights Act 1998. This paper is going to define and compare the impacts of both Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Communities Act 1972, by showing both similar and contrasting effects on the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty.
Before any legislation could be implemented, a definition of human rights had to be compiled and accepted. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was approved in 1948 by th...
Condé, H. Victor. A Handbook on International Human Rights Terminology Human Rights in International Perspective; V. 8 Lincoln University of Nebraska Press, 2004.
The largest growth in claims occurred in 2001, following the implantation of the human rights act in 2000, with the percentage of ECHR claims increasing to 63% of all judicial review cases being presented. This increase in ECHR cases being presented remained high in following years and highlights that awareness of human rights protections and a willingness to invoke the rights substantially increased following the implementation of the Human Rights Act, indicating that the ECHR has had a significant impact on the legal culture of Northern Ireland. However, despite this major increase, judges I Northern Ireland have found to be unwilling to act upon or enact any proceedings regarding the ECHR claims with only one declaration of incompatibility being issues since 2000. (Weiden,
Prof. Jeffrey A. Brauch, The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the rule of law, Vol.11, Columbia Journal of European Law (2004-2005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR), Art 5(1)(e)
R. Beitz, Charles. “Human Rights as a Common Concern”. The American Political Science Review, American Political Science Association, Vol. 95, No. 2 (Jun., 2001), pp. 269-282. Web
MICHAELSEN, C., THE RENAISSANCE OF NON-REFOULEMENT? THE OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. .
Milgate, Dally, Webster, Cornu, Kelly. 2010 Cambridge Legal Studies: Preliminary (Second Edition). Sydney. Cambridge University Press pp 311 - 314
Simmonds C., ‘Paramountcy and the ECHR: a conflict resolved? [2012] Cambridge Law Journal Vol. 71 Issue 3, 498-201
45 Oona Hathaway, ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal
Barria, L., & Roper, S. (2010). The Development of institutions of human rights: A comparative stud. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
McCann, Michael.” Law and social movements.” In The Blackwell companion to law and society, ed. Austin Sarat, Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. 2004.