Aristotle's Dissection Of The Soul Essay

1431 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aristotle's view on the human soul

Dissection of the Soul Aristotle’s taxonomy of the soul classifies things by state of being, potentiality and actuality, and level of the soul. His classifications distinguish matter and substance, matter with form. It also splits up souls into two separate types of potentiality and two separate types of actuality in order to determine what a substance does merely existing, what it is able to know, or what it does with the knowledge it is able to learn. Aristotle also split up the souls in a hierarchy by the level of function that each could perform. The hierarchy is split up into three rankings the nutritive, sensitive, and the rational, all of which are living organisms.
The beginning of Book II on the souls Aristotle distinguishes between matter and form. Form is the combination of matter and form is substance, and in this combination the potential of matter is actualized by the form creating living thing. “ Now matter is potentiality and form is actuality”(On the Soul 412a11). The form in this living substance is called the soul. So to keep the distinction clear, matter can exist by …show more content…

Nutritive organisms are the lowest in the hierarchy because the functions of their souls are the most basic of the three types of organisms; they merely grow, reproduce, and gain nutrition. All three classifications of the soul perform these functions. The second classification is the sensitive. It is in the middle because although they can perceive and move, they cannot think logically. The rational is the highest on the scale because they can think logically. For example, a human being would fit the criteria for all these distinctions. We are nutritive beings in the sense that we exist to grow and reproduce, and we fit into the sensitive beings because we have the five senses, and finally we are rational because we can intellectually make decisions and

Show More
Related

  • Aristotle's Theory Of The Soul

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Melissa is more likely to be attracted to Aristotle’s basic orientation and his view on the soul. Melissa’s mind set leans more towards the scientific thought process when it comes to life and death. Like Aristotle her beliefs are more of the here and now. Making due with the reality put in front of them. Even though Melissa’s thoughts and beliefs mostly come with facts she still has some belief that there is something beyond the body that makes Matthew who he is, Matthew. But with that belief she also thinks without brain function there is no Matthew to save. It is a body with no ability to think and live. So like Aristotle she does think that there is a soul that is a part of our bodies. But without the ability to think then you are not living.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Aristotle's Aristotle On The Soul

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    In De Anima, Aristotle discusses the nature of all living things. His first definition of the soul, and essentially his thesis, is that the soul is the “the first actuality of a natural body that is potentially alive” (412a 27-28). However that is definition that requires a lot of expansion to really mean something.

    Read More

  • Is Socrates view of the soul becomes purify similar to the Christian view of living in the world not of it?

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    The soul is a mysterious entity; unlike its counterpart the body, it cannot be concretely study as a physical object. Parts of philosophy and religion delve into the topic of the soul, trying to denude its nature. As philosophy and religion sometimes resemble each other’s views, assumptions of similarity are made between the two. However, despite appearing similar, upon deep review of the subjects, philosophy and religion may differ in views. This is seen in Socrates’ view of the soul versus the Christian idea of it. Socrates idea of how a soul becomes purify through living a philosophic life rather than a materialistic life is different to the Christian idea of living in the world and not of it. Each idea has similar points, yet there are strong dividing points between the two. I will first discuss Socrates view on the soul, according to his ideas presented in the text Phaedo. Then I will highlight the Christian view on the same topic looking at the Biblical books of James and John before giving the opposing idea based on the similarities of the

    Read More

  • Aristotle And Descartes Reflection Paper

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle felt that the soul is first being-fully-itself of a natural body that has life as its potency. His book had stated the different ways the define and describe what the soul is. The soul had four potencies, which were self- nourishment, locomotion, perception and thinking. Some of these potencies are connected to body or soul. The soul is part of the substantial being, which include material, form, or a composite of both. The soul is what we are as a person but Aristotle also speaks about plants and animals. Plants souls are divisible which includes self-nourishment, locomotive and perceptive potencies. Descartes written two meditation that deals with the doubt that he recently discovered. He learned that everything is false and how certain things can be doubted. He believes if there is a small amount of doubt in something then it could be completely doubted. He had discovered these things through three hypotheses that he had which were madness, dreaming and omnipotent. He stated the use of imagination would lead to unreal things to be seen as real things. He believed that God is the reason why we doubt things because he doesn’t occupy space. He believes that if things didn’t occupy space then it couldn’t be doubted. He also believed that we could not believe in the things that we

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Theory of the Soul in the De Anima

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    Aristotle's Theory of the Soul in the De Anima centres on the kinds of souls possessed by different kinds of living things, distinguished by their different operations. He holds that the soul is the form, or essence of any living thing; that it is not a distinct substance from the body that it is in; that it is the possession of soul (of a specific kind) that makes an organism an organism at all, and thus that the notion of a body without a soul, or of a soul in the wrong kind of body, is simply unintelligible. Aristotle uses his familiar matter/form distinction to answer the question “What is soul?” he says that there are three sorts of substance which are matter, form and the compound of the matter and form. Aristotle is interested in compounds that are alive. These - plants and animals - are the things that have souls. Their souls are what make them living things. Aristotle also argues that the mind is immaterial, able to exist without the body, and immortal by “Saying that something has a soul just means that it is alive”

    Read More

  • Reflection Of Aristotle's Pathe And Affections Of The Soul

    1390 Words  | 3 Pages

    An axe can chop because it has a certain organization. When we say that an axe chops because of its form or organization, however, we do not mean that this form or organization does anything over and above what the composite axe (form and matter) does. Rather, the axe can chop because it has a certain form or organization. The axe can chop because it is arranged this way. Likewise, if one was to read the claim that ‘if an axe had a soul, it would be its ability to chop’ in a certain way, he or she would be lead to think that the soul, like the axe’s ability to chop, does not explain the activities of the body by doing anything over and above what the body does. Akin to the axe organization, the soul/form of a living body is the way that this living body is organized. Moreover, just like all capacities that come from being organized in a certain way, the soul does not explain activities of organized whole by doing anything. Rather, the soul explains perception by explaining how a body, organized in a certain way, (a body that has a soul), can undergo changes that are perception. This is what someone who thinks that the soul is a functionally useful structure or arrangement would have to say about this

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Aristotle's Theory Of The Soul

    1415 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle uses his matter/form distinction to answer the question “What is soul?” and explains through his hylomorphic composition (matter, form, the compound of matter and form) to show that the body requires the soul and vice versa. He believes that compounds which are alive, are things that have souls and it is their souls that make them living things. In this essay, I will present Aristotle’s argument of the soul and whether he is successful in arguing for the mutual dependance of soul and body.

    Read More

  • Does Aristotle’s Function Argument Offer a Convincing Account of the Human Good?

    1843 Words  | 4 Pages

    The identification of the soul parts as the contributors and main elements for the function of the most important human activity (reasoning), marks the inevitable psychological asset of Aristotle’s thinking; specifically, the classification of human virtues derives from the analysis of the soul’s types, attributing to human beings the ability of reasoning which distinguishes human beings from the rest of ‘natural bodies.’ Indeed, reason exists in two parts of the soul, namely the rational and the appetitive (desires or passions), and so it expresses within two different virtues, the moral and intellectual ones. Moral virtues satisfy the impulses of the appetitive part and the intellectual virtues hav...

    Read More

  • The Greek Word Ousia

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is one thing which all existing things have in common. It is the something particular to each natural body which, imparts to it an independent existence, is cause of its existence, and it determines individuality. For example, when you talk of being healthy, there must be something which is the subject of health. Movement requires something which can be moved. Life is the function of something which is able to have life. Life, motion, or quality cannot exist apart from this something which, Aristotle calls this ousia, or primary being.

    Read More

  • What is Plato's notion of a soul?

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    The soul is the battery to the body; the soul allows the body to be a living thing. The soul is the spark that sets fire to the body. The body acquires life, emotion, senses and intelligence with the fusion of the soul. Plato believes that the soul is not composed of parts that can be decomposed or destroyed. When the body dies, the soul is separated from the body and travels to the invisible realm keeping all the knowledge acquired. For Plato, death is a good thing because it sets the soul free. The soul becomes it is truly self; pure, full of wisdom, good, and beautiful. However, when the soul introduces a new body the soul forgets its knowledge, but over time the soul recollects memories by learning. Plato proves this theory when, “In reference to an uneducated slave b...

    Read More

  • Aristotle Reflection Paper

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle uses his matter/form distinction to answer the question “What is soul?” and explains through his hylomorphic composition (matter, form, the compound of matter and form) to show that the body requires the soul and vice versa. He believes that compounds which are alive, are things that have souls and it is their souls that make them living things. In this essay, I will present Aristotle’s argument of the soul and whether he is successful in arguing for the mutual dependance of soul and body.

    Read More

  • Plato's Concepts Of Epistemology And Metaphysics

    1277 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plato's concept of the soul also takes on a multi-pronged approach. Plato divides the human soul into three Meros...

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Theory Of The Soul As The Concept Of The Self

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle’s Theory of The Soul as the Concept of The Self. One of the biggest questions throughout all of philosophy is, what is the self? There have been different definitions and meanings across history, one being that it is the distinguishing mark of living things, as something that is the subject of emotional states and that is responsible for planning and practical thinking, and also as the bearer of such virtues as courage and justice (Lorenz, lines 9-10). We as humans may never have a valid answer to this question until we ourselves reach the point where our own individual souls are faced with the end of its life.

    Read More

  • The Soul: The Body And The Soul

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    The topic of this paper is the soul. In this paper I will be discussing how the soul exists, what the purpose is and the difference between the body and the soul. Most people define the soul as the spiritual part of a human being or animal considered to be immortal. I do believe it differs from the actual body and that it continues to live on after the body is gone.

    Read More

  • The Human Soul: Appetite, Reason, And Soul

    1775 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thousands of years ago, men and women proceeded with their lives in Ancient Greece, sharing their own customs, rituals, and beliefs. When we fast-forward to present day, we’ll find that while many of their customs and rituals have been long forgotten, some of their beliefs they held such as the soul are still circling around the minds of today’s modern world. Over the years, the idea of the soul has been altered, stretched and twisted into something else entirely, but back then, the soul was believed to have been the very thing that differentiated life from the dead.

    Read More

More about Aristotle's Dissection Of The Soul Essay

Open Document