Aristotle’s literary theory of recognition, reversal, and katharsis can be seen in the short story, “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut. According to Aristotle’s theory of katharsis, the feelings of pity and fear helps the reader to purge these emotions to feel better in the end. Recognition is a grand revelation that the main character or readers realize. Reversal is the unexpected change of direction that the story takes. Aristotle believes that the best tragedies include both recognition and reversal at the same time. In the story of “Harrison Bergeron”, Americans have become completely equal by the year 2081. Everyone is average and there are laws and equipment that makes sure that the population is identical in appearance, intelligence, …show more content…
Bergeron asks everyone at the television station to join him in rebelling because he realized that he can be who he wants to be and not what the government wants him to be. That was the moment that Harrison realized that he did not have to be the same as everyone else. Vonnegut shows the theory of recognition in the scene where “Harrison tore the straps of his handicap harness like wet tissue paper, tore the straps guaranteed to support five thousand pounds” (229). The theory of recognition is applied here as Bergeron breaks free of his physical and mental confinement and tries to help others do the same. It is in this scene where the main character gives himself and others hope that the government can be beaten as he sheds off his restraints. Vonnegut did not just randomly put in that scene of recognition into his story. As Aristotle says, “events must not seem to occur randomly or by coincidence, but should seem to proceed according to the laws of cause and effect” (Handout). Vonnegut purposely put in the recognition scene so that the tragedy would have a protagonist. Nothing that Vonnegut wrote into his story was on accident. His story about a grim, hopeless future needed a hero and the moment of recognition gave him the opportunity to introduce Harrison Bergeron as the main hero as he stands up for himself against the oppressive government. Without Aristotle’s theory of recognition applied …show more content…
The double dose of reversal occurred back-to-back as Bergeron realized that he and others should embrace their individuality andthe scene where the handicap general kills Bergeron for breaking the law. The first scene of reversal, where Bergeron strips off his handicap equipment, occurs at the same time as the scene of recognition. Not only does Bergeron realize that the government should not suppress people’s uniqueness but the scene also turns the story around and shows the reader that it is possible for a revolt to happen against the authoritarian government. Vonnegut gives Bergeron and his empress a taste of freedom as “they remained suspended in the air inches below the ceiling, and they kissed each other for a long, long time” (230). This moment of reversal is meant to give the reader and the people watching this happen on television that citizens do not have to be controlled anymore. The next moment of reversal happens right after Bergeron is enjoying his brief experience of freedom as the handicap general shoots Bergeron with a shotgun. The plot is turned around again as hope is taken away from the reader and the Americans as Bergeron’s death became an example of what would happen if any American defied the government. These moments of reversal are applied to the story in order to keep the reader engaged. Readers were captivated as Bergeron danced freely with his empress, but then the heartwarming scene
Toni Marrison’s “Recitatif” describes his main characters, Twyla’s characteristic appearance on how Twyla seems to be happier on praising her mother’s beauty even she was abandoned. While in “Harrison” Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut defines as his hero who desires to change an equal society in which everyone is equal to anyone including physical appearance, such as beauty. Thus, both authors argue differently on beauty. Making everything and everyone to appear gorgeous could help to build a better society.
“Harrison Bergeron” starts with explaining the society within the story. It begins, “The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way,” (Vonnegut 158). With this startlingly different introduction, Vonnegut explains that everyone is equal but does not include how during this time. As the story progresses, the reader begins to see exactly how the citizens are “equal.”
On the off chance that one modifies the arrangement of God and tries to change the world to be totally equivalent, then the world will go to pieces. Kurt Vonnegut composes this story to help us understand that equity is intended to improve no man or lady than another man or lady. The real subject in "Harrison Bergeron" is that balance is for rights and not for properties like magnificence, quality, and
It is very clear that Vonnegut believes that individuality is the only way to have a society that advances and improves itself. Without free thought there is no innovation or art. “Harrison Bergeron” is a heartbreaking and eye opening story showing the dangers of a completely equal society. Equality is important in the eyes of the law. However, being different than the rest is the key staple of human life. Without the ability to be one’s self, human beings are no longer human beings. Complete equality may seem like a good idea, however the ability to have attributes and skills different than other humans is a key component of human life. Without this ability, the world loses its
The story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut is120 years in the future, which allows us to more easily accept some of the bizarre events that happen in the story such as when the character Harrison Bergeron is dancing with a ballerina and there is no law of gravity and motion, so they can almost touch the studio ceiling which is thirty feet high. The author emphasizes in his work themes such as freedom, mind manipulation, the American dream, and media influence, also the opposition between strength and weakness and knowledge and ignorance. The story illustrates that being equal to one another is not always the best way to live because everyone is different for a reason. Also, this is what makes everyone special in your particular way.
Science fiction stories are a very effective way of conveying a strong point. In “Harrison Bergeron” the strength of this short story is its ability to make you think. Not just about the societal structure, but also the abuse of power, and repression. The intentional significance of this story is if people accept oppressive measures in the name of fairness. No one really benefits from these foolish attempts to enforce equality. The tyranny of the majority stifles any sort of freedoms, gifts, individualities, and strengths. If an action must ...
What gives the reader the false idea of utopia in Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is the deep social control in the form handicaps where individual’s abilities and competence and even appearance are neutralized and vilified as a form of inequality. The characteristics of equality chosen by Vonnegut; beauty, athleticism, and intelligence is important to the story’s message. The main focus of the story are the characteristics of equality that are subjective, the very same characteristics we are born with that makes us different and minimally states the objective ones, the ones that plague our society today. This not only satirizes the epitome of equality itself, but rather the people’s flawed ideals and belief of what total equality is supposed to be or should be.
That character is Harrison Bergeron himself. Some evidence showing his connection to the theme is when a character says, "Harrison Bergeron, age fourteen," she said in a grackle squawk, "has just escaped from jail, where he was held on suspicion of plotting to overthrow the government. He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous"(Vonnegut 3). These lines not only provide insight into Harrison’s character his individuality, it also already show the conflicts it creates. Harrison is very brilliant, and very strong. However, it is this strength of mind and body that allowed him to break out of prison, and defy the authorities and terrorize the public. His individuality is what leads him to create this conflict, as well as giving him the ability to do so. The last piece of supporting evidence is thus, "Even as I stand here" he bellowed, "crippled, hobbled, sickened - I am a greater ruler than any man who ever lived! Now watch me become what I can become!"(Vonnegut 5). In this scene, Harrison gives a display of his abilities, and as magnificent as they are, it winds up getting both him and another person killed, and terrorizing the people around, and almost got them killed in the process. His justification? His greatness, his individual talent, and the sole fact that he is able
He wears three-hundred pounds of buckshot around his neck, glasses that make him half blind, huge headset transmitter and caps on his teeth to make him look ugly. When he breaks free of his handicaps he is seen as a threat to society because of how superior he is. The fear instilled in the government is apparent when they burst into the news studio and shoot him dead, all on live television in front of his parents. However, no one will ever remember the spectacle Harrison put on because of the twenty second memory the population has. Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. uses irony, hyperbole and reversal to help readers understand that total equality cannot be achieved without dire consequences.
The point to be noted here, is that Harrison Bergeron could have - given his scholarly capacities stayed concealed and unfamiliar for the length of his life-even began an underground disobedience on the off chance that he had needed to-yet he decided to stroll into a TV studio unarmed, where he would have been effortlessly found by the Handicapper General and shot at sight.
One of the most memorable lines from “A Good Man Is Hard To Find” comes from the Misfit when he says, “She would have been a good woman if it had been someone there to shoot her for every minute of her life (O’Connor 309).” Flannery O’Connor’s depiction of Christian faith can be seen in almost all of her works. Inevitably, the plots in all of O’Connor’s stories end with a shocking conclusion, and this leaves the reader with freedom to interpret the central idea. From the endless list of themes that O’Connor embeds into her stories, “A Good Man Is Hard To Find” is largely influenced by divine grace, hypocrisy, bitter reality, and white supremacy.
...r, we may desist to maintain any individuality or creativity in the future. If we let ourselves be overrun by constraints and restrictions, we prevent ourselves from being the mighty and influential society we are now and fall into a time of dullness and depression. Vonnegut obviously worried about the future administration of the state and wrote this story to prevent upcoming ages from making things grow any worse. By depicting a society in which no original thought could live, Vonnegut makes us ponder before allowing further commands from a higher authority. By exposing an extreme contrast between Harrison and the remainder of the world, Vonnegut encourages scholars to be like Harrison and fight for them and for what they believe. Vonnegut wants our community to precede in a positive and independent course and not be restrained and defined by any higher authority.
Never would I thought that we have a dystopian-like society in our world. Don’t know what a dystopia is? It is a society set in the future, typically portrayed in movies and books in, which everything is unpleasant. The novel Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut is a dystopian story of a fourteen-year-old boy named Harrison who grows up in a society that limits people’s individuality. When he is taken away from his parents, because of his strong idiosyncrasy, his parents do not even recall his presence because of the “mental handicaps” that the government forces onto them. Harrison eventually escapes from his imprisonment and tries to show others that they can get rid of the handicaps and be free. Though the government official, or Handicapper
“A Good Man is Hard to Find” is an example of Southern Gothic literature because it has many disturbing and violent events taken place in the south. O 'Connor wrote this story in 1953 and uses this type of literature to convey the personalities of the unusual characters. O’Connor places two important characters in the story: the protagonist and antagonist. The Misfit, the antagonist, is represented as a philosopher with wise words to advise people about faith, and the grandmother, the protagonist, believes herself to be an idealized woman with her self obsession of her status of a “lady.” In “A Good Man is Hard to Find” O’Connor conveys how characterization can be the underlying concept of the story, and she makes the readers question the
Although the comparisons are well hidden, both today’s society and the story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ share similar qualities. They both deal with equality, which leads to problems and consequences. A second similarity is the struggle of competition and trying to prevent it from occurring, which also leads to problems. Lastly, both struggle with normality, and the fact that it’s hard to accept that different is okay now.