More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on equity in education
Arguments against standardized tests
Arguments against standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Standardized testing Abolishment
Imagine sitting in a hot classroom on a hot summer day filling in oval after oval after oval. Sounds boring, standardized testing should not be mandatory. Teachers wait from 1-2 months for results, Students take too many of them, and students have to halt for everyone to finish.
To begin with finals take up to two months to get results for. 10th graders will most likely be behind in eleventh grade. Trials take at least 25 hours for each subject. Others will say that the time period for result are normal, while that may be true that is the whole summer and teachers still have to tell where the students will be going next year.
Another reason is students take way too many, students get weight put on them after the first couple. Students enroll for two for every subject. Haters will say Students only pick up one for every subject, but I know for a fact that Students take two for every subject, so how many is too much?
…show more content…
Everyone has to wait for that last student, the slowest one that takes their time, and uses it to their advantage. Students deceit do, anything until everyone has executed the test. Others will say the extra time students get can be used for something else, but everything that anyone does now is noisy.
Standardized finals should either be shortened, or ended altogether. Students have to wait, they take too many, students have to halt for others to finish. President Obama has abolished standardized testing students are in the streets screaming about the new law, No Standardized testing
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
Since the release of the report by Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) in December of 2010 many in the government and community are searching for ways to reform the American education system to give American students the greatest opportunity to succeed. According to the report, American students are not testing as high as other nations in the world (Duncan, 2010). There are many contributing elements that have brought America to her knees in the education system, however, the obsession with standardized testing is found to be one of the most influential downfalls.
Argument Against Standardized Testing President Bush is promoting annual standardized testing for all students in grades three through eight. This bill is currently being considered in Congress, and has garnered much support. As of right now, 15 states test students in those grades, and more than 20 have high school exit exams, which look only at the test score of a student, not at his or her academic achievements. Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities to fairly score the increasing number of tests.
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
We all know nobody likes standardized testing. Also known as SOLs. Just long, unnecessary tests that everyone is required to take at the end of the year..
I believe standardized tests are the best thing the state of Texas ever did. This allows the kids that cannot do well on the test understand that maybe college is not for them. It allows for the states resources to be used for the kids that can do well on the test. I mean after all if it was not an accurate way for intelligence to be measured then why would the state force us to do it. Could it be away to hold back the kids that some people believe not worthy of time and money from the state. And these kids that are very smart but do not test well could it cause them undo mental stress. Of course it does. The standardized that are given though out the State of Texas should be abolished because the only thing that it is good for is stressing
Don’t you think students should take standardized tests? To start with standardized tests make sure schools are doing good. It also helps students prepare for later on in school such as elementary school, middle school, high school, and even collage. Even though it takes a while to get the test results back it only takes about 2 days to test. If students didn't take standardized tests how would you know how much they have progressed through the year.It will also give you preperation for next year.Sometimes the time depends on how long the students take to test. It not only tells you how good kids are doing but how well the teachers are teaching. It also shows and helps to know what subjects students are struggling in and what they're succeeding
You may not think about it but Standardized testing is quite expensive. According to Huffing Post and edweek.org Standardized testing cost 1.7 million dollars annually. That is a LOT of money with that we could be doing much more productive things. Also Standardized testing is very timely. According to wbur.org kids takes about 20-25 hours. With this time students are only reviewing things they ALREADY learned when they could be learning something new. Standardized Testing is also a bad situation that can be changed with a little bit of effort. If we stop standardized testing many good things will happen. For Example teachers will stop feeling pressured to teach to the Standardized test so they do not get fired. According to LAtimes.com Standardized tests do not help evaluate teachers. people are actually already trying to change this according to Radio,inc Republicain senate aids are drafting a bill to eliminate standardized testing. With the immense cost of standardized testing we could be putting money toward extra-curricular activities or better supplies. The possibilities are endless. That means that standardized test is something we could change and could make a better situation out
It is apparent that standardized testing is a method that is just not working. It is unfair to low income homes, it is pressuring students and teachers, as well as forgetting about the years of hard work students have put
Standardized testing is nothing more than stress-inducing, boring, and inadequate. One side believes that these tests should be banned, while the other side believes that they should stay. I think we can all agree that taking these tests is extremely tiring. As an 8th grader, I can tell you what I know. These tests are stressful, and in my opinion, a complete waste of time. Teachers, most of the time, only teach what will appear on these tests, anyway. Until these tests are over, teachers will only teach what they have to, and then proceed to cram everything into the end of the year. I believe that standardized testing should be abolished completely and that we should be graded on our in-class tests instead. To do this, we would have to convince teachers that
Standardized testing has been around for many years. It first started out in China, testing out their knowledge of Confucian philosophy and poetry, says TIME magazine. In 1905 French psychologist Alfred Binet developed the first standardized test of intelligence, which is now the modern day IQ test. Ever since World War I standardized testing was a standard practice. These test were used to determine the assignment of U.S. servicemen jobs during the war. There has been a debate recently, asking if standardized testing is showing the true ability of the students and are the students missing out on beneficial lessons because they are only being taught to pass a test.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
Pop-quizzes, weekly tests, final exams, and semester exams are just a few things that a high school student must worry about. A standardized test is a mandatory test that students take, usually through the state in formats such as Parcc or Air. They are supposed to be based on common knowledge plus material learned in the classroom. This controversial topic is debated year after year when the students are required to take them again. Standardized tests should not remain mandatory for graduation due to the fact that they increase stress levels, prohibit the use of creative thinking, and the test graders are not required to be trained.
Adding another requirement after the 21 ½ credits and testing that already came before would just be another thing on a plate high school seniors are juggling. College applications, housing, moving, jobs, and bills alongside making sure that they still can carry their coursework to the best of their ability will put a lot of stress on a person. On time graduation rates have been slowly increasing in the past 3 years, if a student fails the graduation test does that mean that they would have to take another year of school before moving on? This would discourage many students from coming back and taking it again. Which would lower the graduation rate by a drastic
Almost every school year students are expected to take standardized tests such as state tests, the SAT, and the ACT. A test qualifies as standardized if it is graded relative to others and relative to a score chosen as the standard for students. The tests can begin as early as third grade, where students scores may determine if they need to be held back, and through all years of high school where scores from tests like the SAT or ACT can determine if a student is accepted into a college. Controversy has formed around standardized testing, especially high stake testing. Some believe that standardized testing is helpful while others agree that the tests should be eliminated. Standardized testing should be abolished from the school curriculum