Arguments Against Environmental Racism

556 Words2 Pages

Using individual's race to determine where they live is a problem that has been going on for ages and unsurprisingly affects mainly low income minorities. Accompanied with the forced living locations is the presence of companies that emits abundant amounts of pollution. Certain companies’ actions are killing both the environment and populations. Recognizing the problem, a term to acknowledge it was created called environmental racism. Environmental racism is the placing of harmful industries in predominantly black, poor neighborhoods; which can be displayed by the fact that it causes high amounts of health problems, changes in the climate, and remedy the issue. To begin with, environmental racism is detrimental to health. For example, pollution sources like refineries have been found to produce emissions which include “ benzene, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants that have been linked to cancer, reproductive problems, and neurological effects “ (Kay & Katz, 2012). This conveys the idea that pollution sources like refineries are …show more content…

For example experts argued that the siting of landfills in Warren County made no scientific sense. This explains that the pollution sources are purposely placed in the vicinity of minorities despite the knowledge of the fact that it will the residents drinking water. Also, as shown in the article, “Environmental justice: Income, Race, and Health, “... Asthma prevalence in the U.S in significantly higher in minority and low-income populations than in the general population. Unequal exposure to environmental factors that triggers or exacerbate asthma may play a role.” This shows how the government places hazardous companies in minority dominant communities, which exposes them to toxic hazardous and unsafe conditions. This demonstrates how environmental racism is marked by contamination from different sources of

Open Document