Argumentative Essay: The Pro Slavery Constitution

1075 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slavery in america by the late 1800s

The Pro Slavery Constitution
When the constitution was being written, the framers had a plan in mind. Some of the many delegates from the 13 states wanted slavery to end, but most people at the time, wanted slavery to continue. At the time of the constitutional convention, where the constitution was being written, the delegates had a huge task to solve. Do we keep slavery, even though we count them as ⅗ of “people”? After reviewing this question, and the actual constitution, I have decided that the constitution was pro slavery.
Many people had slaves at the time, and wealthy people had hundreds of slaves working at plantations. People in the late 1700’s didn't know how they could manage all their farming and the production of goods. They needed …show more content…

In the whole constitution, not a single word says that slavery is good, and is needed for society. Some argue that this point is made because the northern free state delegates wanted to ban slavery, but the southern slave states wanted slavery, or they were out. The idea was that the northern free states would hint that they didn't want slavery, because they still didn’t want slavery.
The southern slave states wanted to keep slavery, or they wouldn’t sign the document. That made a big problem going around, that needed to be solved. The Constitution needed to be agreed upon by 9 out of 13 of the states. If the southern states didn’t oblige to the Constitution, then it would not be ratified. The free states did have a way in mind to get the slave states to oblige to the Constitution. It was not easy, but the free states managed to barely pull it …show more content…

The basis of the section is to get the message across of the Fugitive Slave Clause, which was a law that made it so any slave that escaped his owner, and found in another state, would not be free, but returned to his/her “rightful” owner. A quote in the section states, “No Person held to service or labor in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence...be discharged from such Service or labor, But shall be delivered up on the Claim of the Party…” This quote is also easy to analyze. It just states what I said before. A slave that has escaped and is found somewhere else, will be returned to their owner. They won’t be disbanded from labor, but be but into worse jobs. It was a risk many slaves were willing to take, just to get to freedom. This is only a win for the slave states because nothing bad happens, only good. They have the chance to keep a slave for a very long

Show More
Related

  • The Differences between the North and South on the Eve of the Civil War

    650 Words  | 2 Pages

    The North always looked at the South with antipathy and kept trying to abolish slavery, but the South didn’t like the North interfering and wanted to continue the use of slavery. The Missouri compromise was another issue between the North and the South. Missouri was a territory state, and it opted to be in the Union in 1818. There was a proposal to ban Slavery in Missouri, even though there were more than 2000 slaves living there, in desperation, Missouri asked for help from the South. Maine was another territory that had petitioned to enter the union, so in 1820 a compromise was set and Missouri was allowed to stay a slave state, and Maine was declared a free state.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Summary: Pro Slavery Vs. Abolitionist?

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States will forever have a bad rep for what happened to those who were once enslaved in this country. The two sides of this controversy, being Pro Slavery and the Abolitionists, set one of the main splits in this country that was supposedly a place for anyone to have “freedom”. What started this affair was the overall reality that African Americans were represented as unusually different, there were many reasons for the white man to justify slavery, and what became the practice of being racial prejudice. The ideas behind what the Pro Slavery activists believed versus the Abolitionists, each to their own, have an attitude towards what they thought was right and wrong for the well being of their country, but

    Read More

  • Civil War Movies: Glory

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ious slaves the right to citizenship, meaning they were able to do anything that a normal citizen could do, for example hold seats of power. The Fifteenth amendment ensured that they were given the right to vote. However, the reason that their accomplishments were in vain was because they did not get rid of racism. Whatever advancement they made was taken back due to whites still believing in racism. After the Reconstruction era, the South feared an African American with power so they formed hate groups and technicalities to get around amendments. Even though the Fourteenth amendment ensured that slaves were given the right to citizenship, the whole ideal of “separate but equal” came into play. With the Fifteenth amendment, the South was able to justify the racist action of enforcing a literacy clause or a grandfather clause by writing it into their constitution.

    Read More

  • The Great Compromise

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Signers did not have much to say on the issue of slavery during this time. In fact, I don’t believe it is mentioned in the words of the Constitutions, rather clauses are in place that seem to touch on the issue of slavery. It may appear the Signers avoided the word altogether. As we know there were clauses included that held some important, rights for slaves and mainly what I can tell slave owners, on the issue of slavery. Although it would seem, at the time in history this was written, and normal way of life, to have offered some protection to slaves.

    Read More

  • Celia, A Slave...

    1459 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The American constitution recognized slavery as a local constitution within the legal rights of the individual states. But in the North slavery was not adaptable to the local economy, and to many, it contradicted the vision of the founding fathers for a nation in which all men are to be free. The South considered slavery as a necessary institution for the plantation economy. It was linked to the local culture and society. As the United states expanded, the North worried that the South would introduce slavery into the new territories. Slavery had become both a moral issue and a question of political power." (Kral p61)

    Read More

  • 3/5 Clause Of The Constitution

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    In fact, if the tolerance of slavery remains in this document and in the union, then it “will very speedily destroy this union” and it will actually be what tears the union apart (Garrison 2). If the union separates, it is in the better interests of the population because the liberation of slaves is certain. While Garrison believed that the founding fathers intentionally preserved the institution of slavery in the Constitution, Douglass believed that the framers intended that the Constitution was to be an evolving document that could in fact be used as a weapon against slavery, and he denies “that the Constitution guarantees the right to hold property in man” (Douglass 2). He asserts that in Article I of the Constitution, which refers to the twenty-year limit on the importation of African slaves, the framers intended the practice of slavery to end after that date.

    Read More

  • Southern Pro-Slavery Rhetoric

    1613 Words  | 4 Pages

    Southern Pro-Slavery Rhetoric By 1860, the slave states had approximately four million slaves making up approximately one-third of the South's population. However, opposition to slavery began as early as the 1700's by religious leaders and philosophers in North America and Europe who condemned the practice, arguing that slavery was contrary to God's teachings and violated basic human rights. During the Revolutionary War, many Americans came to feel that slavery in the United States was wrong because they believed that protection of human rights was one of the founding tenets of the United States, and slaves were not accorded rights. Slavery was likely opposed more rapidly in the North, in part because fewer people in the North owned slaves.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On The Abolition Of Slavery

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    The abolition of slavery started in 1777. In the North the abolition of slavery was the first to start. But, in the South it started during the 1800’s. The Northern states gave blacks some freedom, unlike the Southern states. The national population was 31,000,000 and four and one-half, were African American. Free african males had some limits with their freedom. There were many political, social, or economic restrictions placed on the freedom of free blacks in the North, but the three most important are, Political and Judicial Rights, Social Freedom, and Economic.

    Read More

  • Dbq Civil War

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    The difference between the free states and the slave states was the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. When victory in the Mexican War resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question was now whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery increased, creating a bigger gap between the states who wanted slaves and the states that did not have slavery. The new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, and accepted the problem of the expansion of slavery, which caused North Carolina and other states to secede, causing the whole problem, leading to the civil war.

    Read More

  • Conservatism In The South Essay

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though other areas in the country did contain slavery, the south was the only region that maintained plantation slavery. Since the south was so involved and reliant on slavery, it was an area of the country that found its identity on more than just the Constitution and American ideals. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, delegates, such as James Madison, noted that there was a clear division between the northern and southern states based on whom own slaves. Even in the early nineteenth century, the idea of the south existed in the minds of southerners and their identity was commonly founded in slavery. Since slavery was maintained for a great length of time and southern blood was shed to defend it, it was an identity that was passed down from generation to generation. This passing down of southern values would explain why distinct characteristics rooted in slavery continue to

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay About Slavery

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I freed a thousand slaves. I could have freed a thousand more, if only they had known they were slaves.” Harriet Tubman was a woman known for her important role during the time that led up to the Civil War. She was a woman of incredible strength, courage, and determination. And while Harriet Tubman is credited for giving the slaves an option as to what way they shall spend the rest of their life, the sad truth lies within the quote above. While many people like to believe that slavery was a horrendous act that happened only with small minded people from the south many years ago, that isn’t the case in all honesty. In fact, the idea of slavery was highly debated about and troubled more minds than many are led to believe. While there are

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Slavery

    1202 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Autobiography, “Narrative Life of Fredrick Douglas: An American Slave,” Fredrick Douglas writes to show what the life of a slave is like, because from personal experience, he knows. Fredrick Douglas not only shows how his life has been as a slave but shows what it is like to be on the bottom and be mistreated. Douglas shows that freedom isn’t free, and he took the initiative to become a free man. Not many African-Americans had the opportunity to make themselves free and were forced to live a life of disparity and torture. Through his experience Douglas shows us the psychological effects of slavery. Through Douglas’s memory we are able to relive the moments that continued to haunt his life. Douglas’s book showed the true

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Mudsill Theory

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    After reading the documents of pro-slavery, the pro-slavery supporter’s point of view was quite different. In their opinion, slavery wasn 't made based on white men putting themselves on a pedestal, yet they felt it was based on the will of God. According to the documents of slavery, it was God 's decision to appoint white men

    Read More

  • Justification For Slavery Essay

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    Slavery was one of the tragedies that have shaped not only American history, but global history as well. So what exactly is slavery? Slavery was the legal trade of human beings to be sold for a profit. These people who were taken from their motherland and brought to the United States, Brazil, and a few of the Caribbean islands were forced to do work in households and outside in the fields. Slavery continued throughout the 1500’s to the 1800’s. Between these 300 years, somewhere in between 10 to 12 million slaves were transported across sea’s to become someone else’s property. Many people use the Bible as the justification of slavery, although, the act in itself can not really be justified.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Fight For Civil Rights

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    "At some point in our lifetime, gay marriage/rights won't be an issue, and everyone who stood against this civil right will look as outdated as George Wallace standing on the school steps keeping James Hood from entering the University of Alabama because he was black.” -George Clooney. Over the years, homosexuality have been wrong, but it’s not. Love is love no matter who it is between. The big question is are gay rights Civil rights? Of course they are, Civil rights are positive legal privileges, the right to equal treatment before the law. These rights are shared by everyone no matter their race, gender or sexuality. There is no one in the United States who does not, or should not, share in these rights. There is no such thing as 'gay rights'

    Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: The Pro Slavery Constitution

Open Document