With a woman in combat, it would keep our service larger. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009). Men take up 67%, with woman serving 22% of all of the military in the United States of America today. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009) Imagine if that percentage of woman got larger. It would push the men to be better than them, equally making our nations military larger. Therefore, if we have more military, we have more defense for this
Today, there is much heated debate abut women in the military with valid issues on both sides. Unfortunately, it is rare to hear both sides of the story. Because of this, many people form their judgments without knowing the full implications of those judgments. I have to admit that I was one of those people. I like to think of myself as an equal opportunities advocate. When I chose this topic to write my paper on, I originally planned on writing in support of full female participation in the military including combat positions. After I began the research on my project...
Women have played a tremendous role in many countries' armed forces from the past to the present. Women have thoroughly integrated into the armed forces; all positions in the armed forces should be fully accessible to women who can compete with men intellectually and physically.
Now women are allowed to be in armed forces as we know with the most recent news of the first women to graduate from ranger class, Capt. Kristen Griest and 1st Lt. Shaye Haver however, women are not allowed on front line duty and why is that? Many people say that women are not emotionally or physically capable. Few bigger reasons is that they believe that the male soldiers will do foolish things for our women, the other is that they will pamper with the mission's effectiveness. There has been a lot of conflict with if women are as effective as men and or as useful.
In the United States military combat units at battalion level and below have always been closed to women. However, change has been building up over the past decade on opening those closed positions and the Pentagon has decided to officially allow women on the front lines. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta lifted the Defense Department's ban on women in direct ground combat roles January 24, 2013 and on January 1, 2016 women will be able to apply to all military occupational specialties (Roulo). The lifting of this ban has led to a controversial debate with one side firmly against women in combat with the beliefs that women will hinder men emotionally and that women are physically inept to carry out tasks men do in these positions. The other side believes that women are completely capable of both the physical and emotional factors of front line positions because women have always been fighting alongside men. Although these arguments oppose each other they both can agree that women in combat units at battalion levels and below will change the dynamics of the military.
Throughout history women have proven themselves capable of serving in the military. Women have shown that they do play very important roles in each branch of the military. They’ve done many different types of the jobs, anywhere from nurses to snippers. They can be more useful than men in certain situations. In today’s world women should be given the same opportunities as men, including active combat roles.
Ruane, Michael E. “Women say they already serve in combat roles, despite Pentagon's announcement.” Proquest. Washington Post. 27 January 2013. Web. 10 March 2014.
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
This is because women have proved themselves to be of equal capability as men, and they have already been serving in combat positions alongside men, though not legally. Fortunately, the Pentagon was able to see this and on December 3, 2015 Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter announced that they would be officially allowing women to serve in all combat positions in the U.S. armed forces. This change in military policy will allow more representation for women in the armed forces but it also represents a major leap towards gender equality, further closing the gap between men and
Imagine a big war has suddenly broke out with America and another country. The military suddenly realizes that in order to better their army and be stronger, they need more people to join and fight along with them. The military decides their needs to be a draft. However, men are the only ones eligible to be apart of the draft. Should this be something that should be changed with the military? Should women also be apart of the draft?
As of 2016, this restriction has been lifted. The 2016 National Defense Authorization Act opens the remaining 10% of jobs to women among all branches. Former Secretary Ashton B. Carter specifically states “As long as they qualify and meet the standards, women will now be able to contribute to our mission in ways they could not before.” Female integration into combat roles falls under seven guidelines. Summarized: Implantation will be pursued forcefully and effectively; jobs are assigned based on ability alone; equal opportunity does not mean equal participation; physical differences between men and women is noted; noted perception that integration could affect combat effectiveness; the performance of the team is paramount; not all of America’s allies share the perspective of an integrated male-female military (Pellerin). The United States Military thrives on recognition and reward being based solely on an individual’s abilities and
Women have prevailed over their shortcomings as a result of their dedication for equality. Women and men have all paid their homage to this nation as members of the armed forces. On December 4, 2015, Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter ordered the Pentagon to open all combat positions to women (Rosenfeld). The integration of women in combat did not come without the adherence of female soldiers. In 1994, a ban was set to prevent women from participation in such positions (Skaine). For almost twenty years women have been fighting to prove themselves as equal in the eyes of the armed forces. Women have suffered criticism in all aspects of strength, ability, and biological differences. Gender roles have delayed the successful deployment of the integration
To start off, citizens believe that having women in our Armed Forces creates an even better force. Having women does not only give more help to the forces but it also gives better talent and an even stronger army. In the article, “Get Women Ready for Combat” by CNN it summarizes how women will make the forces stronger and essentially many women have applied as a total of 205,000 women are occupied in the army today. Even if people don’t women in harm’s way they are still pertaining or having a harm introduced to them either way in the military. Secretary Ash Carter has also already directed the military to open
Gender equality in the military has been an issue for years, it's like a problem that doesn't seem to be solved. Women do not hold the same opportunities as men do. Accomplishing a career in something you love is a big achievement. Women strive to achieve greatness in everything they do just like any other man, but unfortunately women are forced to settle down and respect the restrictions they are put up. This is a big use that has been spoken about by many. Jena McGregor, a graduate of the University of Georgia writes on her article "Military Women in Combat:Why Making It Official Matters”, published on May 25, 2012 the main factors that keep women from achieving equal opportunities as men do in the military. She supports her argument by giving a lot of facts on this current issue.