Argumentative Essay On Wild Animals

Animals deserve basic rights to avoid suffering and have possession of their own lives because it would eliminate conflicts with animal abuse, containment, and inhumane experimentation.

PETA released hidden video footage cumulated over months of the unbearable animal abuse occurring at MowMar farms in 2008. Recordings caught employees repeatedly beating female pigs with iron rods and herding canes. Torture included spraying dye into pigs nostrils “to get the animal high” and electrocuting pigs unable to stand on their own. The employees practiced “thumping” which is the act of holding pigs my their hind legs and slamming them down on the concrete to eliminate underweight piglets, however many piglets remained twitching and padding for hours
Exhibits artificial habitats are poor substitutes that do no realistically resemble the animals’ natural environment. The American Zoo and Aquarium Association accredit less than 10% of licensed exhibitors of wild animals. If wild animals are to be kept in captivity, their needs must be met.
This article reveals zoos deficient and pathetic contributions to “conservation”. It shows how zoos use the disguise of helping endangered species and providing public education programming to cover up the mere motive of financial profit. This source does not consider the beneficial public experience gained from being able to see animals that you would not be able to see in a specific geographical region. This article could be improved if it expanded on what zoos can do to improve and provided more examples on good zoo practices.
This source will supply factual evidence of zoos poor contribution to conservation and inadequate habitats that poorly resemble natural environments and do not meet animals
Humans do not have the right to use animals for their own needs including scientific experimentation. All animals have the right to be treated with respect. Animal right critics state that animals cannot have rights because they do not respect human rights. We do not suppose that young children must first respect our rights before we are responsible for respecting theirs. Animals are just as eligible for basic rights as humans because they have equal inherent value and are subjects or life.
This article provides many examples that revoke many critics’ validity against animal rights. This information could be used to explain why animals may be different but still deserve the basic rights that humans possess. Including more factual evidence and persuasion rather than discussing animal’s souls and human’s magnitude of evil could improve this source.
This article will be used to argue for animal’s right to avoid suffering and the possession of their own lives by proving that all subjects of life have equal value and