Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teacher shortage essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teacher shortage essay
Continuing, the topic of school funding is obviously an extremely controversial topic that is being debated right now. But, it is important to look at what the possible outcomes of these protests could potentially be. The way that it is looking now, it doesn’t seem that teachers are going to be backing down from their requests. This is surprising considering that even participating in a walkout could have gotten many educators fired from their jobs. However, because of the shortage of teachers, it is extremely unlikely teachers will get fired because there is no one to replace them. This is what Amy Johnson was talking about when she said, “We have nothing to lose.” But, it’s difficult to see where the money to fund all the pay raises and schools
In 1974, Rebecca Norsworthy went from Texas to Alaska. Her husband had finished law school, but had a commitment to the Air Force. They requested to go to Alaska, a place of adventure, planning to stay for four years. Then they never left.
Although cuts have to happen they don't necessarily need to happen at schools, schools should never be making budget cuts when there's so many other things we can cut. Military equipment for example can be cut we just launched fifty missiles into our “enemies” missiles averaging out to a cost of millions of dollars. There is no reason why schools should be cutting programs just so we have other things like military weapons being funded.
The issue of whether charter or public schools are more beneficial for students has been an ongoing debate. The question that arise is which type provides a better education. Having gone to a charter high school myself, I got to see and experience first-hand the benefits of going to a charter school as well as realizing the issues charter schools face here in Oklahoma. These problems need to address in order to guarantee that students are getting the best education that they can get. We are facing an epidemic today with our education system and charter schools could be the solution. There may be opponents to the idea of having charter schools, but they have been wildly successful lately and are quickly expanded throughout the states. This is due to the fact that charter schools can benefit people economically, educationally, and as well as socially.
The programs, classes and work days being cut in the k-12 school budget are greatly impacting our children's opportunities and educational potential in our children, having negative effects on their learning and growth potential. We as a nation see it everyday, your favorite teacher having to leave, your child crying because they can no longer take art because it is no longer offered at their school, or your child happy from not having class because of a furlough day (which they do not seem to realize is not a good thing).
Most school vouchers are highly beneficial for low-income students. The government puts a specific amount of funding on a school voucher for parents to cover the full tuition for a public school education. Some families are financially burdened, so they cannot always send their kids to go to the best school. The school vouchers creates the opportunity to change that and improve education for all children. It encourages students to enroll in school, which increases graduation rates and standardized test scores. According to the text, the proponents believe the school voucher programs will be a huge success because it provides students with high-value products and advanced technologies to use in class. However, there are negative aspects associated
Getting up to go to school really early in the morning is more upsetting than having to actually attend school. Almost all high school students would agree that high schools should start later in the morning. Even though high school students should be responsible
Why does college have to be the most expensive when we can’t afford even to pay half of our tuition just to stay in school right? In my Documented Argument, I attended to argue that the problem of rising tuition costs affects not only students, but also their families. Most average eighteen-year old’s planning on attending college don’t have enough money to pay for college, forcing them to rely on their parents for financial help and cause them to be in debt for their rest of their life’s. I want to be able to understand why the government rises the tuition and why they rely on the family’s income to see if they’ll get benefits or not. Raising tuition prices are starting to change people’s mind about what they really want to do with their life. My personal experience, why the government rises tuition and financial aid each year will gives us in insight about not giving the opportunity of an education to someone who has no money.
One question that may come to mind is, “What is liberal education?”. The answer is simple, liberal education is an approach to learn, that teaches people the ways of life. Liberal education has come to be a “necessity” in our world today. According to Huffington’s Post. “All successful careers require critical thinking, teamwork, sensitivity to cultural, demographic, economic and societal differences and political perspectives” (Ray). It is with our understanding that people who choose to obtain a liberal education already have this advantage over the people who choose not to obtain a liberal education. Although, in some cases this isn’t entirely true. Charles Murray’s states in his argument that only a small number of students have the ability or the interest to successfully pursue a liberal education. The issues of liberal education are debatable. This is the reason why Newman and Steffens would have different views on Murray’s statement.
How does the rising cost of college tuition affect us? Every year thousands of students attend a college or university, usually of their choice, with the goal of achieving a higher education and to better their future. The cost of attending college is too high and it needs to go down; there needs to be more scholarship and grant opportunities. The high cost of attending college is a major reason that students aren’t able to achieve higher education; others take this as a challenge and it is motivation for them to work harder to achieve their goal. One might ask why would someone want to spend money to receive more education and miss out on more years of work that they could’ve performed? For many, it is so they can receive more salary for the jobs that they will have later in life, also so that they can get training for their wanted career. The cost of attending college is high and continues to rise without indications of decreasing. The rising cost has many benefits such as earning more pay, but it also has its disadvantages such as the debt that is accumulated from student loans. Not everyone can afford to drop down thousands of dollars and attend school for a few more years. Students who wish to receive a post-secondary education must decide whether it is the right choice for them depending on their financial standpoint, meaning that they must decide if they have the resources to further their education.
The arts department needs funding for the students and the students need supplies. some schools actually have trouble keeping the art department funded and still thinks it's important to keep due to the football and sports outcry when the sports teams gets a little budget cuts.The art department needs more funding in schools because kids need outlets to express their emotions.School district without the arts leave many students without an outlet for the creative capabilities and without options for expression of their talents. schools districts struggle to avoid deficit spending districts superintendents are looking for ways to save money.
Proper school funding is one of the keys to having a successful school. Americans believe that funding is the biggest problem in public schools. School improvements revolve around funding. There needs to be funding not only in the successful schools but also the schools that aren’t doing as well. In documentary, Waiting for Superman, it talks about how smaller class sizes will help students. Funding is what will help the smaller class sizes. State funding mechanisms are subject to intense political and economic scrutiny (Leonard). Studies have shown that funding is inversely related to accreditation levels (Leonard). School funding needs to be increased, but there must be accountability as well.
“ Charter schools are held ideologically as a vehicle for resurrecting, at once, public education and the economic dominance of American business” ( Fabricant and Fine, 12). Charter schools were and are placed as innovative institutions responding to the apparent failing traditional school system. The charter school I observed did not seem to be practicing innovative ways of instruction, nor did it seem to be academically different than a public traditional school in Chicago. Although, researching their website, the partnerships this charter school system has are propelling and financially rewarding American businesses. It also provides the “image” of giving parents an additional “different” choice, specific to serving the Latino community.
Summer break is awesome, but after a couple months, it’s always time for school again. Walking into the class on the first day and hear, “Pop quiz! Let’s see what you know.” Then you realize that over the summer you have forgotten everything from the previous year. Why should we have to relearn material because of a long summer break? This is why we should have school year-round.
When parents think of their children going to school they think of how they are going to learn and advance. children on the other hand think of all the new things they are going to learn and what a fun experience it’ll be. Not anymore. Education today has deteriorated and is being portrayed as a common core standard education. Some say it will help students think, yet students think is difficult and irrational. Education shouldn't be a program built by the government, state or for that matter nor the president. Education should be changed in numerous ways that will help students excel in school and as well advance as citizens outside of school.
Will school choice significantly improve educational standards? This is the fundamental question in school choice policy debates. Are vouchers the solution or do they just compound the problem? Teachers unions believe school choice will destroy the public school system, a mainstay of government responsibility. Yet others argue that the failings of public education are the fundamental reason why certain groups are held back from advancing their place in society. Who is right? More importantly, whose interests will win out?