Many people argue that this system doesn't really work. According to Pema Levy of Newsweek, the system does block some people from getting guns, but it isn't 100% effective. The system is only as good as the information entered into it, and many local courts are lax about reporting convictions (Levy). Even if a potential criminal is stopped from buying a gun, they could still get one if they wanted to. According to Joe Lienhard, these regulations only apply to gun dealers.
The debate behind whether or not guns should be control is very broad due to the fact that no law is the same when it comes to guns. For example in most rural areas in North America such as the southern states that law abiding citizens who uses use for sports feels that it’s a god given right to bear arms and that no government can take or infringe upon that right because of the 2nd amendment. These are the idea of federalism in America. Many opponents to gun laws fear that eventually their right to even have a firearm will be taken
There have been no studies of the effectiveness of gun laws that have shown any positive effect, yet some studies have shown a negative effect of gun control laws. The obvious effect of gun bans is to deny the law-abiding citizens access to firearms for their defense. Many people argue that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens doesn’t prevent the possessions of guns by criminals, because if criminals really want to get guns, their going to get them. If guns were eliminated from the scene, more knives, clubs, axes, pieces of pipe, baseball bats, brass knuckles, or, for that matter even fists would be used to kill people. “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”.
To have gun control throughout the nation means violating a person’s constitutional rights. Although people feel like taking away guns will limit crime, this issue should not exist due to the fact that guns are needed and necessary for self -defense against crime. Enforcing gun control is violating a citizen’s second amendment right to bear arms. This goes to show that throughout history governments have seemed to have sided with their citizens, although in reality the governments have seemed to have sided with their authority to remove liberties. The people’s right to bear arms is our only defense against the onslaught of oppressive government tyranny.
Don’t change the laws, just enforce them better. Gun control is a very large and very controversial issue in our country today. Disarming civilians, though, is not the way to deal with armed criminals. The government should let us keep our rifles, shotguns, and handguns, because we have proven ourselves by means of a background check to be responsible citizens. If we ban guns, we lose our best chance at defending ourselves from criminals who get guns illegally.
Congressman Jack R. Kingston of Georgia cautions citizens to look at what occurred in Jamaica after the enactment of very strict gun control laws in 1974. “In Jamaica, the law included random house-to-house searches, secret trials, detention, and mandatory life sentences for possession of one bullet” (Alpers et. al., 2013). Within six months violent crime dropped significantly, however, within a year it went back to the level it was before the gun control law was enacted and it continues to increase (Bijlefeld, 1995). Interestingly, one-third of murders were committed by the police because citizens were not able to protect themselves from tyranny.
Guns are not the cause for all the violence and crimes that have happened over the years. They do not increase the death rates. Children are more likely to die in a car or swimming pool accident then gun related deaths (VerBruggen). The weapons are needed for protection and hunting, owning a gun is not unconstitutional Taking the Second Amendment away or changing it would be unconstitutional and Un American, It is like any other right. This right is one of the reasons why we are the land of the free and home of the brave.
However, despite the United States being the number one country in gun ownership, it is number nineteen in gun related homicides rates. (Wikipedia) Even at number nineteen, there are still nearly 12,000 gun related crimes/homicides per year. (FBI) In Australia, Finland, and the UK, there are less than 40 gun related crimes/homicides. The solution to less crime now seems to lean towards banning guns. However when looking at the overall violent crime rate in the United States, the numbers are 367.9 violent crimes per 100,000 people.
That answer to that question is a no. Though gun control may seem to be a good idea in theory, it is completely impractical. As an example, in the navy yard sho... ... middle of paper ... ...ust be said; when gun control activists say that if there were no guns there would be no gun crime, they are wrong. This is the entire though behind their crusade and is why so many political problems have arose. It would be impossible to accomplish such an act and so they are left with nothing more than a theory.
This can be explained by the fact that most lawmakers do not respond instantly to the absolute violent crime rate, but their field of concern is rather the level of attenti... ... middle of paper ... ...ns of the government. As the Militia was reformed into the National Guard that is subject to the federal government, the purpose of keeping and bearing arms under these conditions is lost, so the first clause does not make any sense. On the contrary, the gun rights advocates argue that the first clause can be ignored altogether, and the second clause is meant to give the rights to all people to protect themselves by means of firearms. The answers to these questions are not found yet. That is why there is such divergence in the minor gun control problems interpretations by separate states.