Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

Euthanasia essentially is an easy and pain free death. The research paper and article, “Support for Voluntary and Nonvoluntary Euthanasia: What Roles Do Conditions of Suffering and the Identity of the Terminally Ill Play?” uses the opinion of the public of Thailand to highlight public policies that should be enacted in various national governments. Though the authors used over generalization of religious and cultural groups through stereotyping and scapegoating, they effectively use the three appeals to illustrate the controversy and complexity of euthanasia, while providing concrete data with a large sample size to have their results discussed generally outside of Thailand, and in the United States and Europe.
The article written by Dr. Ho and Dr. Chantagul emphasized the benefits of euthanization for humans, and discussed the opinions of 1,897 Thai adults ranging from 18 to

The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the Thai public followed the trend of increasing acceptancy of euthanasia. In countries such as New Zealand, 1,000 citizens were surveyed, resulting in support of active euthanasia of 73%. In their experiment, the definition of the phrase as was described as, “The term euthanasia is synonymous with the phrase mercy killing and involves either assisting in the commission of suicide or administering painless or merciful death to a patient who is hopelessly ill,” (Ho 252). This classification led to the question being investigated: how do people respond to voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia based off of pain, family burden, and debilitated body? Voluntary euthanasia was defined as patient requesting death through verbal response or wills, while nonvoluntary euthanasia was described as another person choosing the death of patient. The most basic example of nonvoluntary euthanasia is removing someone off of life support. From the surveys, the doctors concluded that attitudes differ between