Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

Euthanasia, as defined by the Encarta Encyclopedia, is the “practice of mercifully ending a person’s life in order to release the person from incurable disease, intolerable suffering, or undignified death” (Encarta, 2004). Euthanasia is a Greek word, which means “good death.” As humans, we understand death is something we cannot avoid but having some control over death is empowering and reassuring to us. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness, intolerable pain, or in a long-term coma, euthanasia is an acceptable option for someone to end his or her life. With the consent of their doctor(s) these people should be able to have the law on their side supporting their decisions.

What is euthanasia? The word euthanasia comes from Greek words. “eu” means good and “thanatos” means death. When these two words are put together, it means “good death”. However, in the dictionary, the meaning of euthanasia is “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of a hopelessly sick or injured individual in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”. Although this definition is meant to indicate euthanasia, it may give people a negative idea about euthanasia. Most people who choose to have euthanasia are patients with incurable or painful diseases such as cancer or Hepatitis B. These people go through a lot of pain every day; so don’t they have the right to choose death over going through a life of both physical and mental suffering? Euthanasia gives people with diseases like such, to have a good death without going through the suffering and pain. Yet, euthanasia is only legal in four countries and 3 out of 50 of the states in America. Many

Amelia Chromy Mr. Edmund English 4-Period 4 March 31, 2014 The Value of Life Euthanasia, the intentional and direct killing of a patient by a physician or another party, most commonly done by useful lethal injections. Originally done to compassionately end pain or suffering. Imagine society where people live in constant fear for their lives. They would never live life to the fullest, or know what was coming in their future.

Argumentative Essay on Euthanasia Throughout history, particularly in the medical field, there have been numerous cases where trained nurses or doctors have purposefully helped their terminally ill patients pass on into the afterlife. There are many people who believe that these actions are compassionate and graceful, most likely because the patients is awaiting their fate to come to pass or are in severe pain almost every day. But on the other hand, there is a huge opposition that thinks otherwise. This group of individuals believe that at the end of the day killing is killing, no matter what the motive is, or how much pain and suffering the patient was going through. When discussing how to deal with patients who cannot be cured, one of the biggest questions that arise is whether euthanasia should be legally allowed to end someone’s pain and suffering.

Euthanasia was an idea created in the mid 1800’s, when John Warren recommended the used of chloroform to hasten death and take away pain. By definition, it means good death. Even if a death was brought upon out of mercy from a physician, but nothing good didn’t came from it, it’s not consider to be euthanasia. The greater good and the lesser evil can be interpreted in different way, and what is the value in life and it’s relation to the definition of death can also vary. Consequently, countless debates and cases emerged, where the decision to whether or not kill the patient was situated. Who get to decide and is it morally permissible in the first place. This problem emerges from each individuals’ value on life and how they perceive death. People can perceived death as an ending to a suffering, and denying that choice is inhumane, or they can perceived it as an end to self, and you can’t just kill yourself because its convenience. There are a lot of grey areas that emerged from this debate, but a deep look inside the debate. We can see that how our personal belief on life and death dictate our opinion. The debates on euthanasia, an important issue that can govern the relationship between hospital and the community, are separated into two sections, one for and one against, both sided used their individual interpretation of life to argued their opinion on the debate and when taking a closer look, we can see how the view in death dictate their opinion on the issue and how that affect the laws implemented by their government.

Merriam-Webster defines euthanasia as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.” As a globally issues, euthanasia is always in controversial. Swanton,D argued that euthanasia protects the rights of individuals and the freedom of religious expression. Additionally, Sydeny,D outlines europe’s increasing acceptance of euthanasia which may mean that euthanasia is a preferable choice for people. Conversely, Fagerlin, A PhD from University of Michigan Medical School and Carl E. Schneider, JD from University of Michigan Law School suggest the great distortion of living wills if euthanasia is allowed. What is

In most countries, there is a shortage of health resources. So, if we allowed people to use euthanasia, it would open up valuable resources. Some patients who are ill and could be salvaged are not able to get quick access to the facilities they need for treatment. While at the same time, incurable people who would prefer not to keep living are using scarce health resources. Having the option of euthanasia to these people would open up health resources to people who actually wish to live (BBC “in favor”). We need to legalize euthanasia so both patient and economy can

We live an ever-changing society that should not view Euthanasia as an unethical action, but as a way of help for suffering patients. Everyday their are thousands of hard working individuals that are diagnosed with a terminal illness and are now faced with decisions that must both be in the best interest for them and their families. This is neither an easy choice nor one that should be made without serious thought, but it should not be denied or penalized by society or government. It is a choice that must be made only by the patient in question with the input and understanding of their families. Many members of our society have worked very hard throughout their lives and if it is their desire to elect Euthanasia to spare them of the pain and the financial burden that a fatal illness would leave behind, then so be it.

Euthanasia is not an acceptable medical practice for everybody. The countries and states that currently have laws about end of life methods strictly states that these methods are reserved for terminally ill or patients in a vegetative state. These patients have been told they will die. I agree that all people should be able to live a full, happy, pain free life and a life that guarantees them to be able to communicate their medical wishes to their family and doctors. I also agree that people should be able to die a peaceful death without pain and suffering.

Euthanasia: Humanity or Homicide? Is murder wrong? If the answer is “yes,” then one is indicating that euthanasia is also wrong. Euthanasia is “deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering” (“Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide”). It is frequently looked upon as “mercy killing” or “dying with dignity,” but can also have negative effects upon the people.