Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment

1903 Words4 Pages

Capital punishment remains one of the most polarizing and controversial issues of today. This is largely because of how much hangs in the balance of the decision a state makes on the legality and morality of the death penalty. What is at stake is not only the fate of an individual, but also the definition of morality in a state and society that condones the execution of one of its citizens, whether or not the execution is justified. There have been varying arguments on either side of the debate with different parameters like closure, justice, and religion being applied. I argue that while it must be applied with the utmost care, capital punishment still has a place in society today and can be justified. Capital punishment is a punishment only meted out in the rarest of the rare cases and only after exhaustive proof is provided to determine the guilt of the accused. However, mistakes do occur occasionally and this is one of the arguments forwarded by its detractors. In fact, the Quran argues that it would be better to imprison or even let 100 criminals go than to kill one innocent person. However, this argument detracts from any of man 's actions because human error is inescapable. So rather than to eliminate capital punishment, active efforts must be made in order to make sure …show more content…

This is a stance that I find to be very persuasive. He says that when an individual commits a crime, especially murder, it is a private act. On the other hand, when the state executes a man for his crimes, it is a manifestation of societal vengeance and society 's attempt to restore a just society. So while the end result of taking a life may be the same, the nature of the killing makes all the difference. To support the state in this, Meilaender provides proof that while the Bible does not require killings, it allows for it in cases that are deemed

Open Document