Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

536 Words2 Pages

Animal Rights Essay Many people have different opinions on animal right. I believe that animal testing is a good thing and we should keep on doing it too ensure the safety of humans. Many people believe that animal testing is a bad thing and cruel to animals because they deserve the same rights as humans but animal testing has saved many human lives and has found many different cures. I believe animal testing is a good thing because animal testing has contributed to many cures and treatments, animals also benefit from animal testing, and even though I see why people might think that humans should consider stopping animal testing I believed that we shouldn’t. I think that animal testing should continue because animal testing has contributed too many cures and treatments. According to neuroscientist Elizabeth Burnett from the article “should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?” last updated on 29 January 2014, says that experiments on dogs in which had their pancreases removed help on the discovery of insulin which helps save lives of diabetics. Animal research has also helped on understanding and treating breast cancer and many other diseases. So I agree on animal testing because it has saved many human lives and it will continue on finding many treatments for the worst diseases. Chris Abee, the director of the …show more content…

Burnett also claims that if it wasn’t for vaccine many animals would have died from rabies, leukemia, hepatitis virus, and other diseases. She also says that animal testing has also helped saving endangered species from extinction. I agree with what she said because many animals have been saved because of animal testing by finding cures for them. Also many animals like the black-footed ferret, the California condor and other endangered species have been saved from extinction because of animal

Open Document