Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
importance of working in groups and teams
importance of working in groups and teams
managing cultural diversity in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: importance of working in groups and teams
LOVEREET SINGH ID NO-15015730B UNIT STANDARD-9691 (a) Appropriate situations for group work Example Explanation Situation 1 The size of the group If we have a less time for doing everything’s if we have a large group we can allocating work with each other’s we can completed our work in given time. Situation 2 The skills and knowledge of the group While working in group who have a different information and skill for instance some skilful in accounting some are in marketing so, we can collect knowledge and skill from others. That is a suitable work. (b) Inappropriate situations for group work Example Explanation Situation 1 Time consuming If we a large group for example when we have to give opinion from others sometime …show more content…
• We can increase our communication skill such as speaking listening and methods of group work task. Some of these skills will be very useful in your future and work places. • Students get the chance to work on large projects (larger in scope or complexity than individual tasks) • It provides a structured learning experience that can prepare students for the realities and diversity of the workplace, working with people with different skills, cultures, approaches and from different places. • Decision-making, problem solving, value: Students develop and practice skills in Explanation, communication, critical thinking, communication, conflict resolution, and Together. Disadvange of working in group • A problem is people going too fast, without waiting to see if everyone understands what is going on. • Some group member don’t get important of their personal work related to study in group so, the group motivation can be down if someone do not work well in group work. • Sometime can be fight in group when some members don’t work with each group according to the other group members its least to detrimental effect on their group …show more content…
Three examples are written below the first of all this paper work to enhance cultural diversity or to the working group detract, developed a theory about the conditions under which. Integration-and-learning perspective, access-and-legitimacy perspective, and discrimination-and-fairness perspective: in three culturally diverse organization to qualitative research, diversifying our workforce and identify three different perspectives. Diversification has expressed the view and had been traditionally underrepresented in the organization that respect and appreciate your spouse, and his racial identity at work is to interpret the meaning of diversity-related stress management a working group of affected. This, in turn, work group and its members to work for and with meaning. Diversity at all three perspectives to diversify their staff Josh manager was successful, but integration-and-learning needs to continue to benefit from the diversification standpoint logic and provided guidance. Work in the composition of the working group and its population identify conditions that interfere with our research and cultural diversity to the relationship between the results of the group work helps to explain the mixed
There are eight symptoms of groupthink. The first symptom is when all or most of the group view themselves as invincible which causes them to make decisions that may be risky. The group has an enormous amount of confidence and authority in their decisions as well as in themselves. They see themselves collectively better in all ways than any other group and they believe the event will go well not because of what it is, but because they are involved. The second symptom is the belief of the group that they are moral and upstanding, which leads the group to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of the decisions. The group engages in a total overestimation of its morality. There is never any question that the group is not doing the right thing, they just act. The disregarding of information or warnings that may lead to changes in past policy is the third symptom. Even if there is considerable evidence against their standpoint, they see no problems with their plan. Stereotyping of enemy leaders or others as weak or stupid is the fourth symptom. This symptom leads to close-mindedness to other individuals and their opinions. The fifth symptom is the self-censorship of an individual causing him to overlook his doubts. A group member basically keeps his mouth shut so the group can continue in harmony. Symptom number six refers to the illusion of unanimity; going along with the majority, and the assumption that silence signifies consent. Sometimes a group member who questions the rightness of the goals is pressured by others into concurring or agreeing, this is symptom number seven. The last symptom is the members that set themselves up as a buffer to protect the group from adverse information that may destroy their shared contentment regarding the group’s ...
Diversity is the key to growth in today’s aggressively competitive global marketplace. Leaders can no longer hide behind their lack of cultural intelligence, but embrace diversity. To enjoy its benefits. Cultural diversity refers to the varieties of human cultures and the cultural difference that exist in the organization, society or the world as a whole (Amadeo, K., 2014). The characteristics of diversity include race, language, ethnicity, religion, value system, education, nationality, social structure, beliefs, sex, and physical appearances. Cultural diversity is increasingly growing in the United State workforce. A report shows a projection of decline in white working age from 83 percent to 63 percent and an increase in the minority group from 18 percent to 37 percent by 2020 (NCPPHD, 2005). The cultural diversity has contributed substantially to the social and economic growth of the country. Leaders in an organization should not ignore the substantial benefits of cultural diversity in the workplace, but maintained and value it to increase the organization’s reputation and productivity.
Today’s management in the workforce is composed of all types of people verses thirty years ago when white males held a majority of upper-management positions in companies. These positions are now held by a mixture of ethnic back grounds and women who hold just as many if not more management positions then men. Just by looking at the changes in management demographics shows how important it is for people to understand cultural competency in the workplace. Dr. Roosevelt Thomas Jr. (1999) stated, “Diversity is the collective mixture of whomever we have in our workforce characterized by their differences and similarities” (p.11). Managers and supervisors must understand the characteristics of a diversity mature individual; they also need to be able to articulate the differences between affirmative action, managing diversity, understanding and valuing diversity to build skills that transforms awareness into productive and supportive workplace behaviors.
When one person slacks off and does not do their part than another person has to do more than their fair share and that isn’t effective teamwork. Also conflicting personalities can be difficult to work with in group settings and the effectiveness of the group overall can suffer. One team member may bring negative energy to the group while another member took it upon himself or herself to play the role of the leader and boss everyone around. Prior to beginning the task it is important that every role is established and everyone is on the same
Group project also strengthens my capabilities in organising and managing time effectually, for example attending scheduled group meeting and complying my roles and responsibilities to finish my part of work within the deadline. While working within groups can be stressful, there are countless benefits and advantages if the task is well managed and organized.
•Working with others;being able to work on and off a team setting( meaning two or more people working together in this instance) and one must be well at being involved with
Feedback influences the amount of time the group members spend discussing the topic and could be used to dispute flows. The experiment was conducted and presented to a dozens of individuals in large electronic rooms with the "Lost in the Desert" survival scenario. Participant were given a list of fifteen objects where they must select five that would help them survive. After the picked their items were instructed to enter an assigned chat room and discus the possible choices, they had no obligation choose the same item as other groups. The discussing ensued with no one knowing whose group they are in. This created disconnect to all for a more analytical process. The results indicated that positive feedback results more in the production blocking and less effective decision-making. Negative feedback increases the amount of time spent on group discussion. Evidence suggests that groups whom receive negative feedback during decision-making process engage in more argumentation, likely an effort to support their own argument in the face of criticism. The use of devil 's advocacy by a group requires more discussion to reach agreement than is normally needed. In comparison, groups who receive positive feedback will likely require less time to reach consensus by virtue of not requiring the same amount of argumentation. (Marler & Marett, 2013).
living in a modern society, often times we are given with task that we must complete in given period, and sometimes we are given task that is too much for us to handle on our own. With that, we are required to form groups with other individuals and work together to complete such given task as working in groups will significantly reduce the time required as well as the workload to complete such task.
When forming a group it is important to include everyone right off the bat. Receiving good input from everyone is key to group development. Everyone in the group must respect and get along with the other members in order to provide substantial progress.
Our work methods must coincide with the work we are trying to produce. So by working in smaller teams to identify and solve every issue then it will provide faster service, which in tu...
In order to gain some purpose while working in a group, I know it can be challenging task to do because every group member is required to agree and cooperate. I am privileged to become a part of a group and completed our task successfully. Our group consists of 5 members and we experienced the stages of group development along with which different roles being considered. Our group formed with the common interest of competing and representing ourselves as competent and knowledgeable. The storming phase involved a trial being held to determine the capabilities of each other and positions were found to be disputed due to which we voted on leader of team. In the norming stage, roles of every group member have been stated and identified with the
Due to the fact that prior success and failure were positively correlated to group cohesion and self-efficacy, both forms related to collective satisfaction and commitment to the group. Lee notes, “Although there is a positive association between group efficacy and performance some studies failed to demonstrate the same positive relationship” (Lee). In other words, even though there is positive correlation between group cohesion and performance the study failed to show the same positive relationship every time. Debunking the theory that even though you have group cohesion you will not have a positive performance rate. When asked to grade themselves the students and employees ranked themselves higher than with the
Group projects can negativity affect individual members of a group because uncooperative members can bring down the whole group. These members leave the majority of the work to the other students. This is unfair because they get credit for the work they did not do. In addition, these unhelpful members can cause tension in the group as the rest of the group can become frustrated. The tension will distract students from the project. Furthermore, these students slow down the progress of the group, which can lead to them not completing the project in the given time. For example, while working on a group project, a group member put off doing their part off their part until the night before it was due. Their action had a harmful effect on our score which
Groups influence our everyday lives in ways that we don’t even realize. Most of what is learned from groups are societal norms that are being reinforced on a micro level in everyday life. Group influence on individuals is a clear tangible proof of societal norms by institutions. The groups we become a part of therefore can have a greater influence on our individual actions then we are aware of. As an individual we like to believe we have agency over our actions and what we decide but a lot of our own actions is more a part of a group mentality. Also, individual’s go along with a group’s influence so they feel better about themselves because then they won’t be ostracized. This paper will analyze different aspects of individual behavior and
engage different learning styles, provide hands-on opportunities for use of specialist tools or equipment, reinforcing learning, supporting and motivating individual learning, fostering independent learning through extended learning.