preview

Ap Us History Dbq Research Paper

Good Essays
In 1787, several states got together to revise the Articles of Confederation. By doing this they changed the course of our history. Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the constitution while Federalists were working towards it. Federalists were trying to convince everyone about the benefits of checks and balances. After the Bill of Rights was added to the constitution, citizens were more at ease about the ratification process. Anti-Federalists are those who are against the idea of the Constitution. They objected to the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and opposed final ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Patrick Henry, a strong-headed Anti-Federalist, brought up many points pertaining the flaws of the already existing Articles of Confederation. A few of which are that it disencourage the power to collect taxes, or enforce treaties, and diminished the idea of a national court system. The Anti-Federalists found this a problem because they feared that before long, Congress would pass oppressive taxes that would create an even bigger issue. They also disagreed with these terms because if they were unable to enforce treaties, they could not make peace with other nations, which could result in a catastrophe.…show more content…
Without this system, one branch of government might become more powerful than the others. It is necessary that we keep each branch equally powerful so that one matter doesn’t get more attention than the others. For example, the president could veto a law passed by Congress. Congress can override that veto under certain circumstances. Another example is that the Supreme Court may check Congress by making a law unconstitutional. The power is balanced by the fact that members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president. Those appointments have to be approved by
Get Access