Anti Racism Vs Common Sense

Common-sense version:

To combat racism effectively it is necessary to understand its complex features and underlying themes. Recently, such understanding is lacking in many anti-racism strategies in Britain. Anti-racists’ understanding of racist thinking and arguing is unsophisticated. Anti-racism can be characterized as the disavowal of complexity for the sake of pursuing moral certainties. Anti-racism seems to lack in effectiveness because of its doctrinaire form and its lack of powerful arguments.

Criticisms:

Verkuyten, Jong, and Masson (1994) may have been subjected to a great deal of criticism and condemnation if they had presented their introduction, which contained many generalizations regarding racism, in the “common-sense” manner

The strategic incorporation of fellow researchers primarily constructed knowledge and grounded research, but in one instance even acted to dispute previously introduced data. For example, the adverb, “however” was introduced to dispute Petranka et al.’s and Rapheal’s findings. Moreover, throughout the passage there was a tendency to include indirect speech exclusively, as there was a single quotations noted. While incorporating citations, deMaynadier and Hunter consistently cited other researchers by name, rather than referring to other researchers anonymously. I also concluded that the writers’ trend of utilizing the verb “found” to report expressions was clear throughout the analysis, unlike the aforementioned passages where trends could not be identified. Additionally, other reported expressions were conveyed through the words “reported” and

Rather, Killingray’s state of knowledge regarding the history discussed appeared to be vast, however difficult to understand. Additionally, there was also a lack of secured generalizations, as compared to those found within other disciplines. In fact, there was merely two direct quotes, which were the only two additional sources noted within the entire passage, and both of which may be classified as agentless expressions as the speaker was absent from the text. As a reader who is unfamiliar with this style of writing, I found myself seeking citations to assist in attesting to the relevance and importance of the topics discussed. Moreover, the generalities that framed the direct quotes also varied from those explored in Giltrow et al., and direct quotes were integrated directly into the generalities, without their context fully provided. In addition to other variances, the construction of the citation also differed from what I have become accustomed to throughout my