Anti-Federalist And Federalism
analytical Essay
1162 words
The American Constitution was a product of the extensive and considerable debates on theoretical argumentation. Robert Yates, assumed to be the writer of pseudonym Brutus I, represents the Anti-Federalist view of governments and the way that constitution should assert their powers on society, while Federalist 10 gives us an glimpse of the Federalist view of society. Both these documents present us with the best examples of Anti-Federalist and Federalist thought. A major topic discussion between these two documents is the size of republics, as well as each view as to why their notions are the best for the new society.
Anti-federalists and Brutus asserted that the new U.S. Constitution would eventually lead to the termination of the state governments, the consolidation of the Union into “one great republic” under an unchecked national government, and as a result the loss of free, self-government. Brutus additionally thought that in such an extensive and diverse nation, nothing short of despotism “could bind so great a country under one government.” Brutus suggests that large governments give room for “absolute and uncontrollable power” which allows for a large diverse government, which would, in turn, threaten personal liberty. These large governments lead to ambitious enterprises, glory, empire building, and adventurism; all of which the Anti-Federalists agree should be prevented in a society. Brutus stresses homogeneity and virtue because these represent harmony and discordant principles. People are more likely to be civic spirited in a small republic, rather than a large one which the Federalists are supportive of.
In the letter from Samuel Adams to John Scollay, we see Adam’s Anti-Federalist view of government. Adams supports...
... middle of paper ...
... effects of factions, Madison argues that factions should be controlled and allowed to exist; factions are not only essential to a republic but also natural and therefore unavoidable.
While a variety of factions exist, Madison asserts that the strongest factions are those dealing with economics. As such, Madison advocates a large, commercial republic to control the effects of factions: large in that the more factions exist, the less likelihood any one faction will gain absolute power as the factions will frequently form and re-form short-term coalitions; commercial in that the individual must have freedom in the market in order to preserve the creation of economic factions. A republican form of government is essential to control factions since minorities are given some protection as the representative would be more interested in the public good than self-interest.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the american constitution was a product of the extensive and considerable debates on theoretical argumentation. robert yates represents the anti-federalist view of governments and the way that constitution should assert their powers on society.
- Analyzes how brutus and anti-federalists asserted that the new u.s. constitution would eventually lead to the termination of state governments, the consolidation of the union into "one great republic" and the loss of free, self-government.
- Analyzes brutus and adams' anti-federalist view of government in the letter from samuel adams to john scollay.
- Explains that the american constitution was a product of the extensive and considerable debates on theoretical argumentation. robert yates represents the anti-federalist view of governments and the way that constitution should assert their powers on society.
- Analyzes how brutus and anti-federalists asserted that the new u.s. constitution would eventually lead to the termination of state governments, the consolidation of the union into "one great republic" and the loss of free, self-government.
- Analyzes brutus and adams' anti-federalist view of government in the letter from samuel adams to john scollay.
- Analyzes how madison countered brutus' argument that a large republic would counter the "mortal disease" of popular governments.
- Argues that madison rejects the idea of homogeneity and virtue because men have a natural tendency to divide themselves into factions aggregating themselves from the rest of the society's interests.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist papers are important to understanding the framers' vision for the government and fears about the dangers of factions.
- Explains that factions are groups of people who gather to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. they often work against the public interests, and infringe upon the rights of others.
- Analyzes how madison wrote federalist #10 in response to brutus' attack on the proposed constitution on october 18, 1787.
- Analyzes how madison mentioned the importance of having a large republic and many factions, even when speaking on checks and balances and federalism, which is the basis on which federalist 51 is written.
- Analyzes how madison argues that factions should be controlled and allowed to exist.
- Explains that madison advocates a large, commercial republic to control the effects of factions.
Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!
Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
- analytical
- The Evolution of Federalism and Housing Policyanalytical essayWills, G. (Ed.). (1982). Introduction. The Federalist papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. (pp. vii – xxiv). New York: Bantam.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how james madison, alexander hamilton, and john jay drafted the federalist papers to persuade new york to ratify the united states constitution.
- Explains that the american concept of federalism implies balance, a system of checks and balances created by division of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the national government.
- Explains how the personal responsibility and work opportunity reconciliation act of 1996 shifted responsibility for the administration of entitlements to states, and the emphasis on public housing changed.
- Analyzes how james madison, alexander hamilton, and john jay drafted the federalist papers to persuade new york to ratify the united states constitution.
- Explains that the american concept of federalism implies balance, a system of checks and balances created by division of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the national government.
- Explains how the personal responsibility and work opportunity reconciliation act of 1996 shifted responsibility for the administration of entitlements to states, and the emphasis on public housing changed.
- Explains that the framers of the constitution couldn't have foreseen the changing role the national government would have in the affairs of local and state domestic policy.
- Explains how the government became directly involved in domestic policy during the depression and new deal.
- Cites cimini, c. n., dehaven, t. and nivola, p. s.
1468 wordsRead More - Examples Of The Federalist Paper And Government Todayanalytical essayIn today 's government political parties are a large part of government operations and how decisions are made in the government. In Madison 's The Federalist, No.10 Madison talked about how factions can control and cause harm to the government. A solution to this control was the use of a republic in order to limit the power of factions and keep them from having complete control. In our government however, factions have become a major part of the government system with political parties having complete control over the different branches of government. The use of this two political party system creates many problems within our government as the two parties fight for control over legislature and control over the government. Despite using a republic system as Madison mentions in his paper, factions continue to control and affect our government today. Madison 's views on government branches also affects our government today. Our government being in branches does help our government from being affected by corruption by each branch being independent from each other. These independent branches help prevent corruption by each branch having independent leadership and control and not being affected by the views of each other. At the same time these branches having unique views and control can lead to problems as the branches of government may not be able to interact properly with
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist papers explains various aspects of government and how it must be organized to better represent the people. madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties.
- Analyzes how madison states that a well-constructed union must control and break apart factions that may manipulate or prevent the passing of proper legislature or government controls.
- Analyzes how madison states that latent causes of faction are sown in the nature of man, and that the government must be fit to handle them and keep them from gaining control over legislature.
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist papers explains various aspects of government and how it must be organized to better represent the people. madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties.
- Analyzes how madison states that a well-constructed union must control and break apart factions that may manipulate or prevent the passing of proper legislature or government controls.
- Analyzes how madison states that latent causes of faction are sown in the nature of man, and that the government must be fit to handle them and keep them from gaining control over legislature.
- Analyzes how madison explains the purpose of having multiple branches of government and how it protects the people.
- Analyzes how madison's federalists papers inspire and explain our government today and how it functions.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist papers have an influence on our government and how it functions today.
1034 wordsRead More - Pluralismanalytical essayIn Federalist No. 10, James Madison stresses that “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison philosophized that a large republic, composed of numerous factions capable of competing with each other and the majority must exist in order to avoid tyranny of majority rule.# When Federalist No. 10 was published, the concept of pluralism was not widely used. However, the political theory that is the foundation for United States government was the influential force behind pluralism and its doctrines.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many critics believe that faction representation is biased in favor of wealthy corporations and affluent individuals. schattschneider claims that the heavenly chorus sings with an upper-class accent.
- Analyzes how madison and the other founding fathers envisioned a country with political freedom and opportunity for every citizen. they hoped that america would avoid tyranny brought by an overwhelming majority.
- Analyzes how texas republican larry combest criticizes the bush administration for turning down the republican farm bill.
- Explains that many critics believe that faction representation is biased in favor of wealthy corporations and affluent individuals. schattschneider claims that the heavenly chorus sings with an upper-class accent.
- Analyzes how madison and the other founding fathers envisioned a country with political freedom and opportunity for every citizen. they hoped that america would avoid tyranny brought by an overwhelming majority.
- Analyzes how texas republican larry combest criticizes the bush administration for turning down the republican farm bill.
- Explains the concept of pluralism in federalist no. 10, which focuses on shared power among interest groups and competing factions.
- Analyzes how the bush administration felt that not enough money would be spent on the environment. pluralism is a large aspect of the united states' political system.
- Cites becker, elizabeth, evans, graham, hewnham, jeffrey, kernell, samuel, and gary c. jacobson, the logic of american politics.
1378 wordsRead More - The Progression From The Articles of Confederation to The Constitution As a Result of Anti-Federalist, and Federalist Debateanalytical essayLooking back in history (1781-1787) at the debate over ratification of the Constitution we can see that the making of the constitution was a long drawn out battle between the federalists and the Anti-Federalists. There were concerns as to the inherent weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, such as the lack of action during Shay’s Rebellion, the issue over taxation, as well as the problematic consensus required by all states to change any one of the Articles. There was a fear that if given too much power the executive leader would become like the king they had just fought a revolution to free themselves from. This fear of giving too much power to a centralized government was what made the Articles so weak. The purpose of this paper is to examine the two sides of the debate of constitutional ratification, The Federalists (and the Federalist papers) as well as the Anti-Federalists (and the Anti-Federalist Papers) and look at their influence on the Constitution. By comparing the essentials of The Constitution as well as The Articles of Confederation we will be able to see the differences between the two. These differences will show us not only the weaknesses of the Articles but the strength of the new constitution. A second objective, where possible make what “if” statements as to what would have happened if the Articles were not replaced, and the Constitution was not written.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the making of the constitution was a long drawn out battle between the federalists and the anti-federalists.
- Explains the political consensus to work together as a collection, rather than as individual states, was agreed on after the american revolution.
- Explains that the 13 issues addressed in the articles are of great value to understand before we look at the two sides.
- Explains that the making of the constitution was a long drawn out battle between the federalists and the anti-federalists.
- Explains the political consensus to work together as a collection, rather than as individual states, was agreed on after the american revolution.
- Explains that the 13 issues addressed in the articles are of great value to understand before we look at the two sides.
- Explains that the constitution was a combination of two plans, the connecticut compromise, and the new jersey plan.
- Explains the compromises that were admitted into the constitution and was necessary from the articles.
- Analyzes hamilton's argument that congress had no power to collect taxes, compared to the ottoman or turkish empire.
- Explains that the articles did not allow for a centralized government that could act in time of crisis. shay's rebellion was an example of this.
- Opines that the articles allowed congress to declare war and raise funds, but they could not conscript, draft, or in any way force individuals to fight in the army.
- Opines that the federalist side was the driving force that moved these events forwards, but the anti-federalists were the ones that won the debate.
- Explains that the anti-federalists were opposed to a stronger federal government because it took power away from states and local leaders and gave most of the power to federal governments.
- Explains that the federalists are the driving force for the ratification of the constitution. they based their ideas on federalism.
- Analyzes how the articles allowed each state more power than that of the congress assembled (sovereignty of article ii).
- Analyzes how the changes from the articles of confederation to the constitution have been for the better.
- Opines that it was crucial that the documents change during the history of the united states. the federalists made valid points about the threat of executive leadership.
- Analyzes hamilton, alexander, james madison, john jay, and clinton rossiter's the federalist papers.
3731 wordsRead More - Federalist #10analytical essayTo Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: one, to remove its causes and the second to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison's federalist paper argues that the constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions.
- Explains that both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions.
- Explains that factions are inevitable due to the unequal distribution of property. men of greater ability and talent possess more property than those of lesser ability.
- Explains that madison's federalist paper argues that the constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions.
- Explains that both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions.
- Explains that factions are inevitable due to the unequal distribution of property. men of greater ability and talent possess more property than those of lesser ability.
- Explains madison's view that there are only two ways to control a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests.
- Explains that direct democracies cannot control factious conflicts because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against an obnoxious individual or a strong majority.
- Argues that madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men the best of america. theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition.
- Opines that in large republics, factions will be numerous, but weaker than in small, direct democracies where it is easier to consolidate their strength.
- Explains that the constitution's immediate object is to bring the present thirteen states into a secure union. the states farthest from the center of the country will be most endangered by foreign countries.
- Analyzes how madison concludes that he presents thee previous arguments to convince those who will not listen to those 'prophets of gloom' who say that the proposed government is unworkable.
935 wordsRead More - The Threat of the Constitutionanalytical essayTo the opponents of the Constitution, many warning signs of potential despotism were visible in the proposed government -- the sole power of taxation, the lack of protection of freedoms, the formation of a large military force, the dissolving of states' powers, and above all, the concentration of powers in the hands of a few. It is this last issue that seemed to be of greatest concern to the anti-Federalists, and logically so, because all other powers and laws prescribed by the Constitution were to be interpreted and e...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the fundamental point of contention between the federalists and anti-federalists in their debates over ratification of the constitution surrounded the question of what powers were necessary for national security and economic prosperity.
- Analyzes how the anti-federalists feared an oppressive form of government, rather than a popular, democratic one, because of the centralization of power.
- Analyzes how the correlation between the potential abuse of power and the rich, intellectual and aristocratic class of americans led to the suspicious perception of government by the anti-federalists.
- Explains that the fundamental point of contention between the federalists and anti-federalists in their debates over ratification of the constitution surrounded the question of what powers were necessary for national security and economic prosperity.
- Analyzes how the anti-federalists feared an oppressive form of government, rather than a popular, democratic one, because of the centralization of power.
- Analyzes how the correlation between the potential abuse of power and the rich, intellectual and aristocratic class of americans led to the suspicious perception of government by the anti-federalists.
- Argues that the anti-federalists' concerns about the potential abuses of power were not unfounded, paranoid delusions; they were based in the reality of the constitution.
- Analyzes how article i created a bicameral congress that possessed "all legislative powers" and allowed congress to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution."
- Argues that the senate's power over the house of representatives is an easy counterargument to the anti-federalists' idea of an oppressive aristocracy.
- Analyzes how the lack of popular elections undermined the possibility of creating a truly representative government by taking the power of choice away from the people.
- Analyzes how the size of the new nation, in terms of proper representation, was of prime importance to the anti-federalists, who believed that extending the nation would make it impractical for the majority of citizens to assert their political power.
- Analyzes how the anti-federalist pen-named "brutus" shows how successful small republics are compared to large ones in matters of maintaining the freedom of its citizens.
- Opines that history furnishes no example of a free republic, anything like the extent of the united states.
- Analyzes how monesquieu's view is supported by brutus' argument for a democratic form of government in terms of representation and consent.
- Analyzes how madison's philosophy of how to secure and maintain power in a large republic adds support to the anti-federalists arguments and fears surrounding the undemocratic nature of the constitution.
- Analyzes how madison's rationalization undermined the political power of the people, but the fear of majority and political factions was not without practical justification on the part of framers.
- Explains that the anti-federalists believed that political representatives needed to act as a mirror of the american people, their values, and their desires.
- Analyzes how the anti-federalists were suspicious of the secrecy surrounding the constitutional convention and held serious doubts about the individual or collective interests involved in forming the government.
- Opines that a bill of rights was added to the constitution, but such fundamental protections were absent from the original document and reluctantly added later by madison.
- Analyzes how the anti-federalists saw parallels between the revolution and the potential for the abuse of power under the constitution.
- Explains that the colonists had experienced the power of democracy in their towns and states, and to take away this newly discovered power was seen as a mortal threat to their liberty.
2564 wordsRead More - Essay On The Difference Between Federalist And Federalistsanalytical essay... could gain more power than the other-because the powers was distributed equally among the three branches of government; Executive, Legislative and Judicial- to overthrow the government. Some commentators on American political thought argue that the American political tradition is an inter-play between the Federalist and Anti-federalist perspectives. This means that both federalists and antifederalists brought up critical points when they were revising the Articles of Confederation. All political perspectives are relating to either one of them. Sometimes, the Federalists’ ideas prevail over the antifederalists’, and vice versa. Therefore, we can say that almost all of the political view can trace its’ origin back to one of these two group and we can see that sometimes one groups idea may succeed over the other, we can also say that this maybe the origin of debates.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison rejects virtue and homogeneity as the basis for a republic, since the government in england had too much power from their internal regulation.
- Analyzes how yates wrote that a small republic would be comfortable to administer, whereas the enormous u.s. territory is excessively tough to be govern. by integrating thirteen states in one unique republic, it will guarantee the liberty and equal right of all us citizens.
- Analyzes how the letter sam adams wrote to john scollay in 1780 showed a worry about the inconsistency of the constitution to other treaties. he opposed the federalism along with slavery on african americans that he sought for liberty and equality.
- Analyzes how madison rejects virtue and homogeneity as the basis for a republic, since the government in england had too much power from their internal regulation.
- Analyzes how yates wrote that a small republic would be comfortable to administer, whereas the enormous u.s. territory is excessively tough to be govern. by integrating thirteen states in one unique republic, it will guarantee the liberty and equal right of all us citizens.
- Analyzes how the letter sam adams wrote to john scollay in 1780 showed a worry about the inconsistency of the constitution to other treaties. he opposed the federalism along with slavery on african americans that he sought for liberty and equality.
- Analyzes how brutus argues that individual states possess too much power, which can lead to tyranny. he advocated the separation of powers and the guarantee of a civilian's right.
- Concludes that the american political tradition is an inter-play between the federalist and anti-federalist perspectives.
- Explains the problems with the articles of confederation during the economic depression in 1786, which led to the creation of the federalist and anti-federalist perspectives.
- Analyzes madison's solution to the problem of factions by mentioning the representative. the idea of implementing representatives ensures that all people’s voice be heard by all states.
1268 wordsRead More - Federalist #10analytical essayIn “Federalist #10”, Madison describes the dangerous effects that factions can have on Republican government and on its people. Madison defines a faction as a group of citizens who unite under a shared cause, and work against other groups in order to achieve their means. Their means of achieving their goals may achieve adverse effects upon the rights of other citizens. Put in more modern terms, a faction could be reasonably compared to a special-interest group. The sort of faction that most endangers the liberty inherent in United States society are factions that contain a majority of the whole. The weakness of a popular government is its susceptibility to the effects of factions. However, a well-constructed Union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is its most important and vital to the success of the Union. Factions arise due to the nature of man to be moved by different opinions and passions. Men will be diverse in their opinions as well as their social and economic classes, and just by the mere presence of dividing classes will factions arise. By means of factions, legislative measures are often decided by an overbearing majority, with little or no regard for others who do not share their interests. Protecting against factions will protect those in the minority, and ensure that the public good is served.
In this essay, the author
- Explains madison's definition of a faction, which entails working against other groups to achieve their goals. a well-constructed union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is vital to the success of the union.
- Argues that madison is adamant about the dangers of pure democracy and the negatives it poses when faced by factions.
- Explains that a pure democracy is better-suited to be extended over the "greater sphere of country". madison holds that there are two options in curing the effects of factions.
- Explains madison's definition of a faction, which entails working against other groups to achieve their goals. a well-constructed union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is vital to the success of the union.
- Argues that madison is adamant about the dangers of pure democracy and the negatives it poses when faced by factions.
- Explains that a pure democracy is better-suited to be extended over the "greater sphere of country". madison holds that there are two options in curing the effects of factions.
- Explains that madison proposes that the effects of factions must be controlled, and the best way to do this is to create a large republic.
870 wordsRead More - Madison vs. Marshallanalytical essayIn Madison’s work of Federalist No. 10, he identifies factions were a problem. He views them as “a dangerous vice”, but at the same time saw factions as a necessary evil. He mentions that “The regulation of these various and interfering interest forms the principal task of modern legislation; and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.” Here Madison states that factions, opposed in spirit to democratic ideals, spreading “unsteadiness and injustice” which are actually necessary for the function of a representative government. Throughout his paper, Madison explains how pure democracy wouldn’t be able to work, because it had “no cure for the mischief of faction.” He believed that this type of government will give so much power to the majority that it was doomed to fail. He sounded very confident that the new constitution would work. He believed of having a representative and a republic system. He had no doubt in mind that new constitution would be the end of the states embarrassment to the world. Madison saw democracy not as an ideal but something that could be modified to be fitted.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison and marshall's points of view differed from one another, and that the political landscape was different.
- Analyzes how madison identifies factions as a problem in federalist no. 10. he believes that pure democracy wouldn't work because it had no cure for the mischief of faction.
- Opines that marshall was erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration.
- Explains that madison and marshall's points of view differed from one another, and that the political landscape was different.
- Analyzes how madison identifies factions as a problem in federalist no. 10. he believes that pure democracy wouldn't work because it had no cure for the mischief of faction.
- Opines that marshall was erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration.
640 wordsRead More - Factions and the Constitutionanalytical essayIn Madison's Federalist 10, it is evident that he was not in favor of the formation of factions. He states, "…The public good is often disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties…" Madison made the point that the dangers of factions can only be limited by controlling its effects. He recognized that in order to abolish political parties from the government completely, liberty would have to be abolished or limited as well. For this reason, the government had to accept political parties, but it did not have to incorporate them into being a major part of the government. He says that the inclination to form factions is inherent, however the parties effectiveness can be regulated. If the party is not majority than it can be controlled by majority vote. Madison believed that in the government established by the Constitution, political parties were to be tolerated and checked by the government, however the parties were never to control the government. Madison was absolutely convinced that parties were unhealthy to the government, but his basic point was to control parties as to prevent them from being dangerous.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that while the constitution does not support factions, it cannot abolish them because it was designed to protect the liberties of the citizens.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist 10 argues that the dangers of factions can only be limited by controlling their effects.
- Analyzes how schattschneider disagreed with madison's view that political parties were destructive to government and should be abolished. the constitution is both pro- and anti-party at the same time.
- Explains that while the constitution does not support factions, it cannot abolish them because it was designed to protect the liberties of the citizens.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist 10 argues that the dangers of factions can only be limited by controlling their effects.
- Analyzes how schattschneider disagreed with madison's view that political parties were destructive to government and should be abolished. the constitution is both pro- and anti-party at the same time.
- Opines that the establishment of political parties has been a positive aspect of american political culture.
419 wordsRead More - Aristotle's Legacy In The Federalist Papersanalytical essayWhile the government of the United States owes its existence to the contents and careful thought behind the Constitution, some attention must be given to the contributions of a series of essays called the Federalist Papers towards this same institution. Espousing the virtues of equal representation, these documents also promote the ideals of competent representation for the populace and were instrumental in addressing opposition to the ratification of the Constitution during the fledgling years of the United States. With further reflection, the Federalists, as these essays are called, may in turn owe their existence, in terms of their intellectual underpinnings, to the writings of the philosopher and teacher, Aristotle.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes aristotle's views on the virtue of rule of a state by the many as opposed to the few or the one.
- Analyzes how hamilton and madison outlined the establishment of the legislative body upon which the united states government is based. what better example of aristotle's thoughts on the subject of democratic government than the existence of a society that embraces his teachings
- Analyzes how hamilton and madison explain the necessity for allowing the people to elect their representatives, accepting that not all men are capable of fulfilling the responsibilities inherent in public office.
- Analyzes aristotle's views on the virtue of rule of a state by the many as opposed to the few or the one.
- Analyzes how hamilton and madison outlined the establishment of the legislative body upon which the united states government is based. what better example of aristotle's thoughts on the subject of democratic government than the existence of a society that embraces his teachings
- Analyzes how hamilton and madison explain the necessity for allowing the people to elect their representatives, accepting that not all men are capable of fulfilling the responsibilities inherent in public office.
- Explains that aristotle maintains that the best ruler is one who has been ruled. the process of election, according to the federalist papers, states the office should be made available to any citizen, except on the basis of being twenty-five years of age or older.
- Argues that the federalist papers owe their existence, in terms of their intellectual underpinnings, to the writings of aristotle.
- Analyzes how the federalist papers mirror aristotle's assessment that rule of the many eliminates or lessens the risk of corruption.
- Cites jay, john, hamilton, alexander, and james madison's "federalist papers: the house of representatives."
- Cites hamilton, alexander and james madison's "federalist papers: the structure of the government must furnish the proper checks and balances between the different departments."
2064 wordsRead More - Unequal Distribution Of Property And Factionsanalytical essayNext, Madison explains the reasons why unequal distribution of property leads to factions. Under the liberal society, people can freely practice their own faculties and experiment of life. Because people make decisions based on their reasoning and self-interest, they will focus on what is beneficial to them. When a group of people come together because they have the same interest, it becomes a faction. According to Madison’s writing “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or of interest… (Page 63)” He believes the unequal distribution of property will divide people into different group and eventually lead citizens to factions. Moreover, because faction is made by people who hold sim...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison explains the link between unequal distribution of property and factions. he states people are born with different talents, attitudes, and physical/mental powers.
- Analyzes how madison explains the reasons why unequal distribution of property leads to factions in a liberal society.
- Proposes how a government should be formed to control faction's harm to avoid mischief in government and promote public good.
- Analyzes how madison explains the link between unequal distribution of property and factions. he states people are born with different talents, attitudes, and physical/mental powers.
- Analyzes how madison explains the reasons why unequal distribution of property leads to factions in a liberal society.
- Proposes how a government should be formed to control faction's harm to avoid mischief in government and promote public good.
- Explains madison's reasons for using republic government to regulate the violence of faction. the first reason is that republic has more efficiency to prevent the tyrant of majority.
- Analyzes how a large number of representatives provide two benefits to society: more choices to choose from, and less agreement in factions.
- Explains madison's suggestion that the u.s. government should use the model of separation of powers to prevent one branch being more powerful than others.
- Explains that ambition is human nature and cannot be changed. madison suggests the government should convert ambition in a good way to prevent abuse of power.
- Explains that the constitution separates congress into the house and senate, which provides internal checks on legislative branch. professor al schendan explained these structures as necessary for liberty.
- Concludes that madison thinks the human nature is ambitious, and the fixed outcome of human ambitions is people create factions to promote their own interests.
1079 wordsRead More - The Dangers Of Factionalism In Canadaanalytical essayIn Federalist Paper Number 10, Madison sees Factions as being inevitable. Humans hold differing opinions and are all living under different circumstances, and are likely to group together with those most like themselves. Some groups of people will attempt to work together to benefit themselves even if it goes against public interests and even if it infringes upon the rights of others. In the Federalist Paper Number 10, Madison feared that Factions could be detrimental to the common good and in order to minimize the effects and control the effects of Factions, the best form of government would be a large republic. According to Madison, to minimize the negative consequences of Factions, they must either be controlled or the causes of Factions must be removed. Since he describes the causes of Factions being the different interests and living conditions between individuals, it can be argued that this solution is not very feasible. It would be impossible to make sure every single person makes the same amount of money, has the same goals, and even goes through similar life experiences. The greatest source of Factions, the deepest and biggest cause of Factions, according to Madison, is the unequal distribution of property. The acquisition of property or lack of property creates class divisions the foster differing interests. Since it is not possible to
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the founding fathers and canada's founders faced many obstacles and concerns when working towards creating the best possible form of government for their respectable nations.
- Analyzes how madison sees factions as inevitable. humans hold differing opinions and are likely to group together to benefit themselves even if it goes against public interests and infringes on others' rights.
- Opines that local governments should focus on local interests without interference from the central government. this gives the two levels their own jurisdiction to best cater to their interests. the difference between the founding fathers and the canadian founders concerns exists because of how power is divided.
- Explains that the founding fathers and canada's founders faced many obstacles and concerns when working towards creating the best possible form of government for their respectable nations.
- Analyzes how madison sees factions as inevitable. humans hold differing opinions and are likely to group together to benefit themselves even if it goes against public interests and infringes on others' rights.
- Opines that local governments should focus on local interests without interference from the central government. this gives the two levels their own jurisdiction to best cater to their interests. the difference between the founding fathers and the canadian founders concerns exists because of how power is divided.
- Explains that the federal union expresses concern about the central government infringing on the rights of the local government, whereas the federalist papers talk abut the parties and local governments creating the division.
- Analyzes how macdonald explains that one of the causes of factionalism the united states had to worry about will not be present for canada.
- Analyzes how william henry does not think that factionalism is as big a threat as the founding fathers thought it to be. william ross fears that what was occurring with new zealand would occur in canada.
- Explains macdonald's concerns about the lack of a legislative union in canada. the founding fathers and canadian founders agree that it is best to protect as many local interests as possible.
- Explains that both the united states founding fathers and canadian founders have concerns about factionalism and how to move forward and away from confederation.
1298 wordsRead More - Anti-Federalist vs Federalistanalytical essayAccording to the Federalists in the early stages of the American republic, a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the Union. This necessity for a more organized central government was a result of the ineffectiveness of the Article of Confederation’s government that was without a unifying government body. One component of this philosophy was the creation of an executive and other federal branche...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that americans were faced with a new authoritative issue after winning the revolutionary war and sovereign control of their home country from the british.
- Explains that a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the union.
- Explains that anti-federalists were fearful of an authoritative, central government as well as the potential for this government to abuse their privileges of state control.
- Explains that americans were faced with a new authoritative issue after winning the revolutionary war and sovereign control of their home country from the british.
- Explains that a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the union.
- Explains that anti-federalists were fearful of an authoritative, central government as well as the potential for this government to abuse their privileges of state control.
- Analyzes how federalist manifestations within the american system imposed impartial political agendas onto the states in an attempt to solidify the union's identity.
- Analyzes how anti-federalist laws counteracted many federalist laws before them. they criticized the constitutionality of the alien & sedition acts as an attack on human rights.
- Argues that the anti-federalist view prevails over the federalist view in the constitution. the bill of rights provides american citizens with freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition grievances against the government.
- Analyzes how the eleventh amendment of the constituion addresses state sovereignty by preventing federal intervention between states and citizens. jefferson's victory over adams in the 1800 election demonstrates the contingency of factions within the nation.
- Argues that anti-federalism sets the stage for the human freedoms that america adopts as its signature characteristics.
- Analyzes bradburn's book, "a clamor in the public mind: the opposition to the alien and sedition acts."
- Explains taylor, alan, "from fathers to friends of the people: political personas in the early republic."
2017 wordsRead More - Democracy In The 19th Centuryanalytical essayDuring the construction of the new Constitution, many of the most prominent and experienced political members of America’s society provided a framework on the future of the new country; they had in mind, because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, a new kind of government where the national or Federal government would be the sovereign power, not the states. Because of the increased power of the national government over the individual states, many Americans feared it would hinder their ability to exercise their individual freedoms. Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused. The “lackluster leadership” of the critics of the new constitution claimed that a large land area such as America could not work for such a diverse nation.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that andrew jackson, the 7th president of the united states, was inaugurated in 1829 and was best known as the person who mainstreamed democracy.
- Explains that the new constitution was an expression of freedom, not its enemy. the new government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king in britain.
- Analyzes how george washington, the first president under the newly created united states, promoted the general welfare of the people to create a society based on individual freedom.
- Explains that andrew jackson, the 7th president of the united states, was inaugurated in 1829 and was best known as the person who mainstreamed democracy.
- Explains that the new constitution was an expression of freedom, not its enemy. the new government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king in britain.
- Analyzes how george washington, the first president under the newly created united states, promoted the general welfare of the people to create a society based on individual freedom.
- Analyzes how jackson's presidency deviated from the original documents set by preceding presidents and the constitution.
- Explains that thomas jefferson promoted the general welfare of the people and helped them prosper with the help of a new, more powerful government.
1358 wordsRead More