Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the war on drugs and its effects on society
the war on drugs in the usa
the war on drugs and its effects on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the war on drugs and its effects on society
Anomie can be brought about through external and internal thoughts, situations, etc. Anomie can be brought about by soaring aspirations. Blacks have aspirations, but the goals or means to these are blocked. These aspirations make people unhappy with the life they have. Blacks are unhappy with the life they have. They see around them violence, crime, and criminals. They also see those successful whites who have better lives and who are looking down at them. This conflict between the haves and have-nots (conflict theory) creates these aspirations. Everybody wants out of the ghetto, out of poverty, and to be free from discrimination. The road to get there is a lot harder when we dangle the prize in front of them, tell them they can get it if they …show more content…
This resembles whites and blacks with their conflict between rights and status. Whites have everything, blacks do not. Blacks experience inequality because the system was created that way to enforce inequality. When capitalism came around, African Americans could obtain work, although this didn’t last long. Eventually jobs were outsourced and machines took over many people’s jobs, especially those with a low skill level. Without jobs, many became unemployed and even homeless. Capitalism is seen in the profiting off the war on drugs. Agencies receive funding and even more if they prove they have used that money and arrest so many people for drugs. These agencies are taking assets from people just on the premise of being involved in a crime, even if the owner is innocent. Many people in the CJS are bribed to be snitches. By doing so they can receive a lesser sentence plus money. This money could be used for communities, but instead agencies are hoarding it for themselves. They even are allowed to use military equipment leading to the militarization of the police. They are offered machine guns, grenades, planes, etc. These are things that they really do not need. If anything is causes fear in the community and many police abuse these rewards and laws to get and do what they want. It was a way to take everything from the poor to keep them lower than dirt and …show more content…
The conflict is between the Whites vs the Blacks and the government vs the community. The media solidified to the public imagination who the target was in the War on Drugs. The image that was portrayed was the black drug criminal. Eventually the war became one of us (whites) against them (blacks), not even drug users or dealers. The media created a population which was capable of seeing a black perpetrator, even when one did not exist. Studies have even indicated that people become harsh when a black man kills a white man, but not vice versa. The media and politics constructed the idea that the war was targeted toward those who are black and brown, the enemy. The government jumped in to support and fully back the war and to back the whites into an area in which blacks could not attack back. They could try, but they would always fail. The government passed many laws and policies that stopped black from getting ahead at all costs and allowed more discretion for those in the criminal justice system to discriminate against those deemed as the enemy. Officials were literally getting away with everything because they could due to how the laws were written. The government said that jurors and prosecutors are shielded from scrutiny from any allegation. This meant that evidence of bias would almost always be unavailable. Those who did (the community) that wanted to prove racial bias and discrimination had to do so by offering in advance
Since the Reagan officials tried harder to stop the Drug Enforcement Administration from exposing the illegal activities that were taking place, the more violence was being caused in these inner city neighborhoods, which lead to more arrests for possession. Now, Michelle explains how the War on Drugs has the most impact on African Americans in these inner city neighborhoods. Within the past three decades, US incarceration increase has been due to drug convictions, mainly. She states that, “the US is unparalleled in the world in focusing enforcement of federal drug laws on racial and ethnic minorities.”(Alexander2016). The percentile of African American men with some sort of criminal record is about 80% in some of our major US cities(Paul Street, The Vicious Circle: Race, Prison, Jobs, and Community in Chicago, Illinois, and the Nation (Chicago Urban League, Department of Research and Planning, 2002). MIchelle referred to these becoming marginalized and calls them “ growing and permanent undercaste.” (Alexander2016, pp
This has unfortunately become a viscous cycle because the war on drugs are so strict its become a slavery or cast system that has taken so much of the black race and incarcerated them for drug crimes for as long as murder crimes. This system is dehumanizing and should be looked over and lifted. Every race uses and sells drugs, it is unjust to use drug laws just to control the black race under imprisonment for small crimes.
When it comes to the topic of war on drugs,most of us will readily agree that the war on drugs is not about the drugs But about the people. Many Politicians and law enforcement will argue that the war on drugs is about our nation's wealth and safety.however they don't see the destruction the war on drugs has caused; The war on drugs has recreated this new system of discrimination among the minority community, individuals and communities are being profiled,their rights as citizen are being seized ,individuals being stripped away from their families. They’re being locked up with no hope to live the American dream in their our country.
Conflict theory is an imperative hypothetical custom inside the field of human science. It attests that specific sections of society benefit lopsidedly from set up social and financial plans, which drives them to utilize the state 's coercive constrain in keeping up that disparity. Despite the fact that this origination of force and disservice was initially an absolutely financial viewpoint, racial and ethnic personalities have turned into a necessary piece of conflict theory speculations as they are characterized and examined today.
In what can be called a viscous cycle starting with the war on drugs, a war that from the beginning has unfairly targeted minorities. A war that has helped contribute to the breakdown of the black family, and add to the constant socioeconomic struggle that perpetuates crime in many communities. These communities experience constant and unfair policing that puts so many youths into the system, that discredits, imprisons, and ultimately breaks them. Filled with discriminatory practices that have been overlooked for years under the disguise of gaining a “Victory.” A victory that may never actually come to
When black americans are convicted as criminals, which is the central ideology that is ruling, they are often stripped of all those rights that make them american, but more importantly make them human. Policing the Planet’s Patrise Cullors discusses her take on why the current discourse is divorced from abolition that summarizes 13th and the broken windows policing, she says “We live in a police state, in which the police have become judge, juror, and executioner. They’ve become the social worker. They’ve become the mental health clinician. They’ve become anything and everything that has to do with the everyday life of mostly Black and Brown poor people…Many of us understand that [police’s] original task was to patrol slaves.”(37) Broken windows policing was the ideological and political project that allowed for the criminalization of black bodies, resulting in mass incarceration that allows the prison system to reach the level where it could be considered modern day
...ere taken in the initial discussions of getting tough on crime in the late 1960s and early 1970s: the conservative side which argued that “poverty was caused not by structural factors related to race and class but rather by culture – particularly black culture” and the liberal side which argued that “social reforms such as the War on Poverty and civil rights legislation would get at the root causes of criminal behavior and stressed the social conditions that predictably generate crime” (Alexander, 2012, p. 45). The liberals were definitely onto something. The process by which we address crime must account for the intersectionality of our country relative to crime. We must respond by shaping our legal framework around a system that is not racially biased, that takes care of the poor and that accounts for gender differences that largely separate males and females.
...tecting their sons from harsh police treatment. Blacks tend to forget that the War on Drugs has devastated other families in their communities and silences families due to the fear of humiliation. The War on Drugs and drug policies have been useful tactics that have to continued to disenfranchise black males and keep them isolated from society, allowing for upper class whites to continue to dominate society as they have for centuries.
“Until justice is blind to color, until education is unaware of race, until opportunity is unconcerned with the color of men's skins, emancipation will be a proclamation but not a fact.”(Lyndon Johnson). For generations in the United Stated, ethnic minorities have been discriminated against and denied fair opportunity and equal rights. In the beginning there was slavery, and thereafter came an era of racism which directly impacted millions of minorities lives. This period called Jim Crow was the name of the racial caste system up in till mid 1960s. Jim Crow was more than just a series of severe anti-Black laws, it became a way of life. Under Jim Crow, African Americans were positioned to the status of second class citizens. What Jim Crow did is represented the anti-Black racism. Further on, In 1970’s the term “War on Drugs” was coined by President Richard Nixon . Later President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war. In reality the war had little to do with drug crime and a lot to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a strategy of used by the government. The President identified drug abuse as national threat. Therefore, they called for a national anti-drug policy, the policy began pushing for the involvement of the police force and military in drug prohibition efforts. The government did believe that blacks or minorities were a cause of the drug problem. They concentrated on inner city poor neighborhoods, drug related violence, they wanted to publicize the drug war which lead Congress to devote millions of dollars in additional funding to it. The war on drugs targeted and criminalized disproportionably urban minorities. There for, “War on Drugs” results in the incarceration of one million Americans ...
This essay will be focusing on the incarceration and war on drug of black community and minority in the United State. The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander discuss who the war on drug effect minority in American. What will be discuss in this paper or the question I will be answering are How has the War in Drugs impacted low-income people and communities of color, particularly African Americans? How has the Drug War disenfranchised a large segment of the American population? How have race and class influenced the functioning of the criminal justice system, especially in relation to policing, the enforcement of drug laws, and sentencing? Do you agree or disagree with Alexander’s contention that the current criminal justice system has resulted in a “New Jim Crow”? Why or why not?
While the War on Drugs may have been portrayed as a colorblind movement, Nixon’s presidency and reasoning for its implementation solidifies that it was not. Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” in his 1971 anti-drug campaign speech, starting the beginning of an era. He voiced, “If there is one area where the word ‘war’ is appropriate, it is in the fights against crime” (DuVernay, 13th). This terminology solidified to the public that drug abusers were an enemy, and if the greatest publicized abusers were black, then black people were then enemy. This “war” started by Nixon claimed it would rid the nation of dealers, but in fact, 4/5 of arrests were for possession only (Alexander, 60). Nixon employed many tactics in order to advance the progress
Karl Marx was clear in his idea about capitalism, he described “capitalism as an exploitative system, meaning one in which workers are forced to work for capitalists without compensation” (Renzetti, Curran, & Carr, 2003, p. 184). The idea of having only a small percentage of the population who use and possibly abuse power is seen as unfair and corrupt. No one has to be an expert to notice that capitalist practices may just appear as a form of slavery. Indeed, in a capitalist society a perception of corruption may occur when there is a disproportionate distribution of wealth and resources that affect the majority of the population. Now, the question becomes: is there any way that government can fix this problem? The answer may be negative, maybe there is no answer in the near future. However, the criminal justice system can certainly take a few steps forward into addressing issues that affect the middle and lower class in the United
Messner and Rosenfeld suggested that the effects of some economic conditions for crime depended on the strength level of a noneconomic institution (Chamlin and Cochran. 1995). For instance, a weak controlled noneconomic social institution would promote higher levels of instrumental misconduct. Messner and Rosenfeld’s institutional anomie theory revealed indicators of some noneconomic institutions influenced economic deprivations (1995). The findings of Messner and Rosenfeld theory have been compared to many other theorists such as Merton, Gottfredson and Hirschi. For example, Gottfredson and Hirschi’s argued that an individual’s crime could manifest itself to engage in a variety of criminal and delinquency acts (Armstrong. 2005). They clarified
These stories were riddled with stereotypes and bias and because of these stories there has been a government lead war on drugs that is racially fueled towards Black Americans. In 1971 President Nixon declared War on Drugs in the United States of America. With the War on Drugs cam e hefty prison sentences and a racial bias towards the Black American public. Black Americans were coming off the tail end of the Civil Rights movements, only to be segregated again in the statistics that were coming out about drugs and the fallacy of highest population of
Social institutional arrangements cause inequality. In the New Jim Crow book, it is clear how the laws are so tough on crime and it causes Many unnecessary incarcerations which is no better because in these facilities there is gang violence that just puts these “criminals” back in a bad environment. “Race had become, yet again, a powerful wedge, breaking up what had been a solid